Aesmservice platform services initialization failed due to dal error
My current project is stymied because SGX is not initializing properly.
On the notebook in question (details below), it occurred exactly ONCE (out of 1,758 events) in the Event Viewer, SGX/Admin event log that a “Critical” error happened described as “AESMService: SGX is Disabled at AESM Service startup”. Since this only happened once, I don’t see it as highly significant.
However, there are frequent “Warning”s to the effect that “ AESMService: Platform Services initialization failed due to DAL error ”. Most log entries say, “AESMService: Platform Services initializing” OR “AESM Service started”. Unfortunately, it appears to be the case that the most recent entry in the event list is always an initialization failure warning … so SGX seems to be perpetually in a non-operative state, even though the service is listed as running,
Another rare error is this one: “AESMService: White List update failed due to network error”. I expect that could happened when I am offline; if it were a problem when I was connected, I would expect to see this error frequently.
Intel SGX is enabled in the BIOS and set to allocate 128 MB (I notice in the Task Manager that the Intel SGX Application Enclave Services Manager is using between 0.3 MB & 2.5 MB depending on when I look). [No running process has allocated to itself 128 MB of RAM (although arguably SGX RAM isn’t listed here).]
The Windows Device Manager, under “System devices” lists the ‘Intel Software Guard Extensions Device’ (driver 2.5.100.2 dated 9/19/2019) – there are no flags; the device is working properly.
Prior to an Intel driver update, the “Intel SGX Application Enclave Service (AESM)” was shown to be running.
Currently, the “Intel SGX AESM” service is listed as running.
According to the Event Viewer’s SGX/Diagnostic informational entries, the AESM Service PSW vs. is 2.5.101.3 (this is Intel’s latest release, dated 11/22/2019).
Troublesome machine is a Dell XPS 15 9570 (2018) notebook computer with a 59 Hz UHD IPS @ 3840 x 2160 monitor, BIOS 1.15.0 dated 25Dec2019, released 14Jan2020, 32GB DDR4.
The CPU is an 8th gen. Intel Core i7 8750H @ 2.20+ GHz, Coffee Lake chipset, Intel UHD Graphics 630 [driver vs. 25.20.100.7262].
The machine is also equipped with an Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q board, but Intel is the default GPU.
OS: Windows 10 10.0.18362.628 (18362.19h1_release.190318-1202)
[I gather that this = the May 2019 Update, “Version 1903”]
I approached Microsoft about this issue and they were worse than useless. I hope an Intel services expert can guide me towards a solution.
Источник
Aesmservice platform services initialization failed due to dal error
My current project is stymied because SGX is not initializing properly.
On the notebook in question (details below), it occurred exactly ONCE (out of 1,758 events) in the Event Viewer, SGX/Admin event log that a “Critical” error happened described as “AESMService: SGX is Disabled at AESM Service startup”. Since this only happened once, I don’t see it as highly significant.
However, there are frequent “Warning”s to the effect that “ AESMService: Platform Services initialization failed due to DAL error ”. Most log entries say, “AESMService: Platform Services initializing” OR “AESM Service started”. Unfortunately, it appears to be the case that the most recent entry in the event list is always an initialization failure warning … so SGX seems to be perpetually in a non-operative state, even though the service is listed as running,
Another rare error is this one: “AESMService: White List update failed due to network error”. I expect that could happened when I am offline; if it were a problem when I was connected, I would expect to see this error frequently.
Intel SGX is enabled in the BIOS and set to allocate 128 MB (I notice in the Task Manager that the Intel SGX Application Enclave Services Manager is using between 0.3 MB & 2.5 MB depending on when I look). [No running process has allocated to itself 128 MB of RAM (although arguably SGX RAM isn’t listed here).]
The Windows Device Manager, under “System devices” lists the ‘Intel Software Guard Extensions Device’ (driver 2.5.100.2 dated 9/19/2019) – there are no flags; the device is working properly.
Prior to an Intel driver update, the “Intel SGX Application Enclave Service (AESM)” was shown to be running.
Currently, the “Intel SGX AESM” service is listed as running.
According to the Event Viewer’s SGX/Diagnostic informational entries, the AESM Service PSW vs. is 2.5.101.3 (this is Intel’s latest release, dated 11/22/2019).
Troublesome machine is a Dell XPS 15 9570 (2018) notebook computer with a 59 Hz UHD IPS @ 3840 x 2160 monitor, BIOS 1.15.0 dated 25Dec2019, released 14Jan2020, 32GB DDR4.
The CPU is an 8th gen. Intel Core i7 8750H @ 2.20+ GHz, Coffee Lake chipset, Intel UHD Graphics 630 [driver vs. 25.20.100.7262].
The machine is also equipped with an Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q board, but Intel is the default GPU.
OS: Windows 10 10.0.18362.628 (18362.19h1_release.190318-1202)
[I gather that this = the May 2019 Update, “Version 1903”]
I approached Microsoft about this issue and they were worse than useless. I hope an Intel services expert can guide me towards a solution.
Источник
Aesmservice platform services initialization failed due to dal error
You asked two questions in a two-part sentence:
The first question was:
«Could you perhaps share an explanation as to how one would verify whether or not these stacks might be installed»
I answered this by guiding you to System Information, where you verified that the DAL, SGX AESM, and ME driver were indeed installed and running.
Your second question was:
«and also what ‘other’ Intel software the guide is referring to that typically would have pre-installed these stacks?»
I answered this by pointing to you to the full software package for the ME stack. The Intel SGX AESM gets installed by Windows Update.
I still don’t understand what you are trying to resolve. It seems that all of the components are installed and running. You received a critical event notification while the ME software was being updated, which is understandable. After the upgrade, everything was back up and running. Please explain what issue you are having with SGX.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
It isn’t clear whether you still have a problem. You wrote that these messages appeared after the initial error message:
AESM Service started. PSW Version: 2.7.100.2
SGX is Enabled at AESM Service startup
White List update requested
White list update request successful from Server, Version: 70.
These messages above make it seem like the problem has resolved itself.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
@JesusG_Intel
To date, there hasn’t been a new problem.
In your reply you said:
«These messages above make it seem like the problem has resolved itself».
One point that I omitted in my OP was that the Intel ME driver was seen as an available Windows Update BEFORE I installed the driver from my OEM’s support site. This availability was what tipped me off about an urgent update.
Going forward in the future as new Intel ME drivers become available, what would help prevent this problem from occurring again ?
I did not notice anything about the ME chipset installation package when the ME installer was unbundled that distinguished itself as being a customized DELL driver. Also, the ‘Intel’ ME driver that was previously seen as available in Windows Update had never yet downloaded on my system, so that couldn’t have been a reason for the errors reported from a re-start after installing the driver from the OEM site.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
To use Intel® SGX platform service, you need to install a full set of Intel® Management Engine (Intel® ME) software components, which includes Intel® Dynamic Application Loader Host Interface Service (Intel® DAL Host Interface Service). If you install Intel® ME driver only, Intel® SGX platform service is not available.
Typically, the Intel DAL stack and Intel ME stack are pre-installed with other Intel software on a platform. However, if you receive an error that Intel SGX platform service is unavailable, install the appropriate Intel DAL stack and/or Intel ME stack.
Unfortunately, since this is a Dell platform and Dell’s drivers you must go to Dell for further diagnosis if the problem persists. I know that all the component names start with «Intel,» but there is nothing Intel can do. Dell controls the platform and the drivers.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
As for the Additional Dependencies that you cited from the Intel Software Guard Extensions (Intel SGX) SDK for Windows* OS Installation Guide, I opened a ticket with Dell’s internal software team. They’re investigating my inquiry on whether the Dell package for the Intel Management Engine Driver includes a full set of Intel® Management Engine (Intel® ME) software components, specifically, the Intel® Dynamic Application Loader Host Interface Service (Intel® DAL Host Interface Service).
To paraphrase from the installation guide, it stated that in order to “use” Intel SGX services, the full set of Intel ME software components (which include the DAL Stack, and the Intel ME stack) must be installed. It also says that typically they (the DAL stack and ME stack) are both pre-installed with “other” Intel software on a platform. Could you perhaps share an explanation as to how one would verify whether or not these stacks might be installed, and also what “other” Intel software the guide is referring to that typically would have pre-installed these stacks?
My platform performed the Online Installation. The BIOS was configured to “enabled” for SGX. It was previously factory set as «Software Controlled». This setting change to enable SGX last year in August had prompted Windows Update to install the SGX PSW and SGX base driver automatically.
This is basically why I changed the SGX setting in the BIOS to enabled. The Intel architecture aims to provide confidentiality to security sensitive computation and protecting against subverted or a malicious OS by leveraging Intel hardware and establishing a secure ‘container’ e.g., enclave.
The Intel Software Guard Extensions(Intel SGX) SDK for Windows* OS Release Notes provides system requirement and fixes but does not offer additional information to debug problems.
As for contacting my OEM, I will tell you and I’m speaking on behalf of many users who have personal computers with various Dell models. I contacted Dell’s technical support last year in 2019 when I enabled the setting in the BIOS. I had a paid account for technical support with their top resolution experts. Not a single person possessed enough knowledge about SGX where they were able to offer any support. They admittedly said that within Dell, training on Software Guard Extensions was non- existent. I spoke with three technicians over the phone who referred me to Intel. Before I hear back regarding the full set of software components for the ME package, I’m not exactly going to get my hopes up high.
Источник
Aesmservice platform services initialization failed due to dal error
You asked two questions in a two-part sentence:
The first question was:
«Could you perhaps share an explanation as to how one would verify whether or not these stacks might be installed»
I answered this by guiding you to System Information, where you verified that the DAL, SGX AESM, and ME driver were indeed installed and running.
Your second question was:
«and also what ‘other’ Intel software the guide is referring to that typically would have pre-installed these stacks?»
I answered this by pointing to you to the full software package for the ME stack. The Intel SGX AESM gets installed by Windows Update.
I still don’t understand what you are trying to resolve. It seems that all of the components are installed and running. You received a critical event notification while the ME software was being updated, which is understandable. After the upgrade, everything was back up and running. Please explain what issue you are having with SGX.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
It isn’t clear whether you still have a problem. You wrote that these messages appeared after the initial error message:
AESM Service started. PSW Version: 2.7.100.2
SGX is Enabled at AESM Service startup
White List update requested
White list update request successful from Server, Version: 70.
These messages above make it seem like the problem has resolved itself.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
@JesusG_Intel
To date, there hasn’t been a new problem.
In your reply you said:
«These messages above make it seem like the problem has resolved itself».
One point that I omitted in my OP was that the Intel ME driver was seen as an available Windows Update BEFORE I installed the driver from my OEM’s support site. This availability was what tipped me off about an urgent update.
Going forward in the future as new Intel ME drivers become available, what would help prevent this problem from occurring again ?
I did not notice anything about the ME chipset installation package when the ME installer was unbundled that distinguished itself as being a customized DELL driver. Also, the ‘Intel’ ME driver that was previously seen as available in Windows Update had never yet downloaded on my system, so that couldn’t have been a reason for the errors reported from a re-start after installing the driver from the OEM site.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
To use Intel® SGX platform service, you need to install a full set of Intel® Management Engine (Intel® ME) software components, which includes Intel® Dynamic Application Loader Host Interface Service (Intel® DAL Host Interface Service). If you install Intel® ME driver only, Intel® SGX platform service is not available.
Typically, the Intel DAL stack and Intel ME stack are pre-installed with other Intel software on a platform. However, if you receive an error that Intel SGX platform service is unavailable, install the appropriate Intel DAL stack and/or Intel ME stack.
Unfortunately, since this is a Dell platform and Dell’s drivers you must go to Dell for further diagnosis if the problem persists. I know that all the component names start with «Intel,» but there is nothing Intel can do. Dell controls the platform and the drivers.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
As for the Additional Dependencies that you cited from the Intel Software Guard Extensions (Intel SGX) SDK for Windows* OS Installation Guide, I opened a ticket with Dell’s internal software team. They’re investigating my inquiry on whether the Dell package for the Intel Management Engine Driver includes a full set of Intel® Management Engine (Intel® ME) software components, specifically, the Intel® Dynamic Application Loader Host Interface Service (Intel® DAL Host Interface Service).
To paraphrase from the installation guide, it stated that in order to “use” Intel SGX services, the full set of Intel ME software components (which include the DAL Stack, and the Intel ME stack) must be installed. It also says that typically they (the DAL stack and ME stack) are both pre-installed with “other” Intel software on a platform. Could you perhaps share an explanation as to how one would verify whether or not these stacks might be installed, and also what “other” Intel software the guide is referring to that typically would have pre-installed these stacks?
My platform performed the Online Installation. The BIOS was configured to “enabled” for SGX. It was previously factory set as «Software Controlled». This setting change to enable SGX last year in August had prompted Windows Update to install the SGX PSW and SGX base driver automatically.
This is basically why I changed the SGX setting in the BIOS to enabled. The Intel architecture aims to provide confidentiality to security sensitive computation and protecting against subverted or a malicious OS by leveraging Intel hardware and establishing a secure ‘container’ e.g., enclave.
The Intel Software Guard Extensions(Intel SGX) SDK for Windows* OS Release Notes provides system requirement and fixes but does not offer additional information to debug problems.
As for contacting my OEM, I will tell you and I’m speaking on behalf of many users who have personal computers with various Dell models. I contacted Dell’s technical support last year in 2019 when I enabled the setting in the BIOS. I had a paid account for technical support with their top resolution experts. Not a single person possessed enough knowledge about SGX where they were able to offer any support. They admittedly said that within Dell, training on Software Guard Extensions was non- existent. I spoke with three technicians over the phone who referred me to Intel. Before I hear back regarding the full set of software components for the ME package, I’m not exactly going to get my hopes up high.
Источник
Windows 10: AESMService: Platform Services initialization failed due to DAL error
Discus and support AESMService: Platform Services initialization failed due to DAL error in Windows 10 BSOD Crashes and Debugging to solve the problem; AESMService: Platform Services initialization failed due to DAL error…
Discussion in ‘Windows 10 BSOD Crashes and Debugging’ started by Krishna GopalRoy, Dec 10, 2020.
-
AESMService: Platform Services initialization failed due to DAL error
AESMService: Platform Services initialization failed due to DAL error
-
Windows 10 – Intel SGX AESM Platform Services initialization fails due to DAL error on XPS 15 9570
May have worked when the notebook came out of the box; unfortunately I have never had occasion to inspect SGX activity or the Intel Management Engine before.
The file vs. of LMS.exe is 1928.12.0.1287, dated 8/5/2019. It is reasonable that this would be a recent version, as I recently installed Dell’s Intel Management Engine package vs. 1932.12.0.1298_A04.
I wish I could inspect some other Windows 10 machines to see if they have
“AESMService: Platform Services initialization failed due to DAL error”
events.Thanks for looking into this for me.
-
Windows 10 – Intel SGX AESM Platform Services initialization fails due to DAL error on XPS 15 9570
When I run the “CyberLink Ultra HD Blu-ray Advisor” vs. 2.0.3201.0 I receive error # 21205: “The required Intel SGX … wasn’t started.” This renders Ultra HD Blu-ray discs unplayable.
I have a Dell XPS 15 9570 (2018) notebook computer with a 59 Hz UHD IPS @ 3840 x 2160 monitor, BIOS 1.15.0 dated 25Dec2019, released 14Jan2020, 32GB DDR4.
The CPU is an 8th gen. Intel Core i7 8750H @ 2.20+ GHz, Coffee Lake chipset, Intel UHD Graphics 630 [driver vs. 25.20.100.7262].
The machine is also equipped with an Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q board, but Intel is the default GPU.
OS: Windows 10 10.0.18362.628 (18362.19h1_release.190318-1202)
[I gather that this = the May 2019 Update, “Version 1903”]
Intel SGX is enabled in the BIOS and set to allocate 128 MB
(I notice in the Task Manager that the Intel SGX Application Enclave Services Manager is using between 0.3 MB & 2.5 MB depending on when I look). [No running process has allocated to itself 128 MB of RAM (although arguably SGX RAM isn’t listed here).]
The Windows Device Manager, under “System devices” lists the ‘Intel Software Guard Extensions Device’ (driver 2.5.100.2 dated 9/19/2019) – there are no flags; the device is working properly.
Prior to an Intel driver update, the “Intel SGX Application Enclave Service (AESM)” was shown to be running.
Currently, the “Intel SGX AESM” service is listed as running.
According to the Event Viewer’s SGX/Diagnostic informational entries, the AESM Service PSW vs. is 2.5.101.3 (this is Intel’s latest release, dated 11/22/2019).
SERVICE STATUS – On this notebook, it occurred exactly ONCE (out of 1,758 events) in the Event Viewer, SGX/Admin event log that a “Critical” error happened described
as “AESMService: SGX is Disabled at AESM Service startup”. Since this only happened once, I don’t see it as highly significant.However, there are frequent “Warning”s to the effect that “AESMService: Platform Services initialization failed due to DAL
error”. {DAL = Dynamic Application Loader
(the DAL HIS is installed by the Intel Management Engine installer)}Most
log entries say, “AESMService: Platform Services initializing”
OR “AESM Service started”.
Unfortunately, it appears to be the case that the most recent entryin the event list is
typically an initialization failure warning …
so I seem to be perpetually in a non-operative state, even though the service is listed as running,ACTIONS – I went to the BIOS and disabled SGX, restarted, tested, went back to the BIOS, re-enabled SGX, retested, all to no avail.
I keep my system updated and nothing appears to be amiss with the Intel Management Engine. Nevertheless, I downloaded and did a repair installation of Dell’s package “Intel Management Engine Components Installer” vs. 1932.12.0.1298 (A04) dated 9Aug19.
The “CyberLink Ultra HD Blu-ray Advisor” still fails with error # 21205 and I still get
“AESMService: Platform Services initialization failed due to DAL error”
events.As this point, I am aware of no additional steps I can take. I would have expected that by 2018 issues with Intel SGX (and DAL HIS) would have been sorted.
I notice from the forum that when Windows 10 build 17083 was released, suddenly SGX was no longer operable for many users. Naturally, I wonder if my problem is a Windows issue as well.
I purchased this painfully top-dollar Microsoft-based Ultra HD notebook with every expectation that I would be able to play Ultra HD video on it, but I am stymied.
What should I do now?
-
AESMService: Platform Services initialization failed due to DAL error
Windows 10 – Intel SGX AESM Platform Services initialization fails due to DAL error on XPS 15 9570
I believe you could go ahead and install the Intel Software Guard Extensions Platform Software driver from Dell without uninstalling anything.
I don’t have a contact at Microsoft for this but I might suggest to post on the Intel SGX forum as the issue involves that platform:
https://software.intel.com/en-us/forums/intel-s…
As I mentioned before the issue could be something blocking, for instance a network issue as suggested by this warning in the Event Application Log:
AESMService — AESMService: White List update failed due to network error
This link mentions the network requirements:
https://software.intel.com/en-us/forums/intel-s…
In the following link from Cyberlink for Error 21205 states
«4. Ensure PowerDVD is not blocked/redirected by antivirus/firewall software protection, and allow PowerDVD to access Internet connection for Intel SGX online verification/activation.»
https://www.cyberlink.com/support/faq-content.d…
Consider temporarily uninstalling Avast (use Windows built-in security software) or check that Avast in not blocking SGX.
Note: The above are non-Microsoft websites. The pages appear to be providing accurate, safe information. Watch out for ads on the sites that may advertise products frequently classified as a PUP (Potentially Unwanted Products). Thoroughly research any product
advertised on the sites before you decide to download and install it.
AESMService: Platform Services initialization failed due to DAL error
-
AESMService: Platform Services initialization failed due to DAL error — Similar Threads — AESMService Platform Services
-
Failed to initialize $MFT file due to error in file system.
in Windows 10 Network and Sharing
Failed to initialize $MFT file due to error in file system.: I am trying to clone my partition on windows bootcamp using AOMEI Partition Assistant 9.13.1 however it keeps coming up with the error «Failed to initialize $MFT file due to error in file system.» I have already tried CHKDSK.EXE in CMD and reinstalling windows however this… -
Failed to initialize $MFT file due to error in file system.
in Windows 10 Gaming
Failed to initialize $MFT file due to error in file system.: I am trying to clone my partition on windows bootcamp using AOMEI Partition Assistant 9.13.1 however it keeps coming up with the error «Failed to initialize $MFT file due to error in file system.» I have already tried CHKDSK.EXE in CMD and reinstalling windows however this… -
Failed to initialize $MFT file due to error in file system.
in Windows 10 Software and Apps
Failed to initialize $MFT file due to error in file system.: I am trying to clone my partition on windows bootcamp using AOMEI Partition Assistant 9.13.1 however it keeps coming up with the error «Failed to initialize $MFT file due to error in file system.» I have already tried CHKDSK.EXE in CMD and reinstalling windows however this… -
The WSearch service failed to start due to the following error
in Windows 10 Software and Apps
The WSearch service failed to start due to the following error: There’s a strange man in my house searching through all of my stuff.Apparently this is Ok because he works for Microsoft!I killed him and Microsoft sent another guy, I killed him too …Microsoft keep sending new guys to search through my stuff.How do I make them STOP ?… -
The SSGDIO service failed to start due to the following error.
in Windows 10 Gaming
The SSGDIO service failed to start due to the following error.: My PC started to get a randomlly BSOD when I’m playing games. It occured while playing and when I closed the game and I don’t know why, When I check the event viewer I’ve got this error, it’s said.Event 7000The SSGDIO service failed to start due to the following error: A… -
The SSGDIO service failed to start due to the following error.
in Windows 10 Software and Apps
The SSGDIO service failed to start due to the following error.: My PC started to get a randomlly BSOD when I’m playing games. It occured while playing and when I closed the game and I don’t know why, When I check the event viewer I’ve got this error, it’s said.Event 7000The SSGDIO service failed to start due to the following error: A… -
the AMDRyzenMasterDriver service failed to start due to the following error
in Windows 10 Drivers and Hardware
the AMDRyzenMasterDriver service failed to start due to the following error: I found this event error log. Can you help me to fix it?The description is: «The AMDRyzenMasterDriver service failed to start due to the following error: The syntax of the file, directory or volume name is not correct.»… -
Windows 10 – Intel SGX AESM Platform Services initialization fails due to DAL error on XPS…
in Windows 10 BSOD Crashes and Debugging
Windows 10 – Intel SGX AESM Platform Services initialization fails due to DAL error on XPS…: When I run the “CyberLink Ultra HD Blu-ray Advisor” vs. 2.0.3201.0 I receive error # 21205: “The required Intel SGX … wasn’t started.” This renders Ultra HD Blu-ray discs unplayable.I have a Dell XPS 15 9570 2018 notebook computer with a 59 Hz UHD IPS @ 3840 x 2160…
-
AESMService: SGX is Disabled at AESM Service startup
in Windows 10 Drivers and Hardware
AESMService: SGX is Disabled at AESM Service startup: j aimerai avoir de laide avec çà svphttps://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/windows_10-hardware/aesmservice-sgx-is-disabled-at-aesm-service/c4b7cc9b-30de-4646-893e-60f0c80dc59d
|
1 / 1 / 1 Регистрация: 01.10.2017 Сообщений: 30 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
01.10.2017, 00:24. Показов 5577. Ответов 10
Недавно решил обновить комплектующие компьютера. Но к сожалению, критует систему и перезагружается компьютер.
Я так понимаю компьютер перезагружается из за крита Kernel Power 41 ? Долго гуглил , но к сожалению не нашел решение своей проблемы. Переставлял драйвера, выключал звуковой адаптер от Nvidia, тестировал память, процессор и видеокарту, ошибок не вывел. Кликните здесь для просмотра всего текста System — Provider [ Name] Microsoft-Windows-Kernel-Power EventID 41 Version 5 Level 1 Task 63 Opcode 0 Keywords 0x8000400000000002 — TimeCreated [ SystemTime] 2017-09-30T20:59:30.746920100Z EventRecordID 1454 Correlation — Execution [ ProcessID] 4 Channel System Computer DESKTOP-Q10C8BK — Security [ UserID] S-1-5-18 — EventData BugcheckCode 0
__________________
0 |
|
Programming Эксперт 94731 / 64177 / 26122 Регистрация: 12.04.2006 Сообщений: 116,782 |
01.10.2017, 00:24 |
|
Ответы с готовыми решениями:
Kernel-power 41 (63)
Ошибка kernel power 41 (63) 10 |
|
110 / 94 / 19 Регистрация: 09.01.2013 Сообщений: 371 |
|
|
01.10.2017, 11:28 |
2 |
|
С учётом того, что материнка из нижнего ценового класса и не претендует на рекорды производительности проверьте её здесь на совместимость с комплектующими (похоже ОЗУ с завышенными параметрами, нужна поскромнее).
0 |
|
1 / 1 / 1 Регистрация: 01.10.2017 Сообщений: 30 |
|
|
01.10.2017, 17:30 [ТС] |
3 |
|
Вот ближайшие ошибки которые возникают во время перезагрузки. Может поможет разобраться
0 |
|
Модератор
15149 / 7737 / 726 Регистрация: 03.01.2012 Сообщений: 31,804 |
|
|
01.10.2017, 17:43 |
4 |
|
А если отключить автоматическую перезагрузку при сбоях, синий экран появляется?
0 |
|
1 / 1 / 1 Регистрация: 01.10.2017 Сообщений: 30 |
|
|
01.10.2017, 17:44 [ТС] |
5 |
|
не пробовал, если отключу есть вероятность что что то сгорит?)
0 |
|
Модератор
15149 / 7737 / 726 Регистрация: 03.01.2012 Сообщений: 31,804 |
|
|
01.10.2017, 17:46 |
6 |
|
0 |
|
1 / 1 / 1 Регистрация: 01.10.2017 Сообщений: 30 |
|
|
01.10.2017, 23:19 [ТС] |
7 |
|
Сейчас подожду экран смерти и скину дамп Добавлено через 43 минуты Добавлено через 16 минут Добавлено через 2 минуты Добавлено через 3 часа 44 минуты Добавлено через 42 минуты
0 |
|
1 / 1 / 1 Регистрация: 01.10.2017 Сообщений: 30 |
|
|
01.10.2017, 23:24 [ТС] |
8 |
|
На этот раз в то же время вышла ошибка, я так понимаю связана с процессором, может она виновник перезагрузок?
0 |
|
1 / 1 / 1 Регистрация: 01.10.2017 Сообщений: 30 |
|
|
05.10.2017, 19:46 [ТС] |
9 |
|
Продвинулся немного дальше в этом вопросе.
0 |
|
0 / 0 / 0 Регистрация: 18.11.2017 Сообщений: 2 |
|
|
18.11.2017, 12:50 |
10 |
|
Недавно купил почти точно такую же сборку, разве что видеокарта 1050TI, а процессор G4560, и точно такая же проблема, просто так, с различной периодичностью перезагружается комп, без особых нагрузок. Уже голова кипит. Миниатюры
0 |
|
Модератор
15149 / 7737 / 726 Регистрация: 03.01.2012 Сообщений: 31,804 |
|
|
18.11.2017, 12:56 |
11 |
|
reg12, Вот тут подробная статья про исправление ошибок системных файлов
0 |
3 простых шага по исправлению ошибок AESM_SERVICE.EXE
В вашей системе запущено много процессов, которые потребляют ресурсы процессора и памяти. Некоторые из этих процессов, кажется, являются вредоносными файлами, атакующими ваш компьютер.
Чтобы исправить критические ошибки aesm_service.exe,скачайте программу Asmwsoft PC Optimizer и установите ее на своем компьютере
1- Очистите мусорные файлы, чтобы исправить aesm_service.exe, которое перестало работать из-за ошибки.
2- Очистите реестр, чтобы исправить aesm_service.exe, которое перестало работать из-за ошибки.
3- Настройка Windows для исправления критических ошибок aesm_service.exe:
Всего голосов ( 181 ), 115 говорят, что не будут удалять, а 66 говорят, что удалят его с компьютера.
Как вы поступите с файлом aesm_service.exe?
Некоторые сообщения об ошибках, которые вы можете получить в связи с aesm_service.exe файлом
(aesm_service.exe) столкнулся с проблемой и должен быть закрыт. Просим прощения за неудобство.
(aesm_service.exe) перестал работать.
aesm_service.exe. Эта программа не отвечает.
(aesm_service.exe) — Ошибка приложения: the instruction at 0xXXXXXX referenced memory error, the memory could not be read. Нажмитие OK, чтобы завершить программу.
(aesm_service.exe) не является ошибкой действительного windows-приложения.
(aesm_service.exe) отсутствует или не обнаружен.
AESM_SERVICE.EXE
Проверьте процессы, запущенные на вашем ПК, используя базу данных онлайн-безопасности. Можно использовать любой тип сканирования для проверки вашего ПК на вирусы, трояны, шпионские и другие вредоносные программы.
процессов:
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.
Источник
I have updated Windows for the latest version 1709 (17763.1). After the first run, I saw a critical error in the Event Viewer. In Services, AESMService is shown as running.
Please see attached screens.
My mainboard: MSI B250M MORTAR, CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-7700 CPU @ 3.60GHz, VGA: NVIDIA GeForce 1050 Ti.
I was trying to reinstall the drivers Intel Chipset Driver 10.1.1.45, Intel Management Engine Driver 1.9.100.41172, Intel Software Guard Extensions 1.9.100.41172, but the error still persists.
Can you please help me? Thank you.
Both your CPU and your motherboard support SGX (per the MSI web site), so it appears you have not enabled SGX in the BIOS yet. First, make sure you have the latest BIOS installed for your motherboard ( https://www.msi.com/Motherboard/support/B250M-MORTAR#down-bios) and then see the manual for how to enable SGX (https://www.msi.com/Motherboard/support/B250M-MORTAR#down-manual)
Here is what I understand is going on, can you please confirm:
1) When SGX is set in BIOS to «SW Controlled», then you get the two screenshots you attached in the first post.
If so, this is expected. You will need to use an SGX App that requests the service to enable SGX, then reboot. When the systems reboots, BIOS will enable SGX.
Or, you can reboot into BIOS and set it to enabled.
2) If you choose to enable it yourself in BIOS, then Windows 1809 will bluescreen (please confirm as you said Oct 2018 1709, but it should be 1809, right?)
I have not seen reports of bluescreens for 1809, but it’s possible something changed in the OS that would cause this.
When you said you solved it with a clean installation of Windows, which version of Windows10 were you installing? 1803? 1709?
After you saw the bluescreen, were you able to save the crashdump?
Did you build your PC yourself or is it from an OEM?
Источник
Kernel Power 41 / AESMService 108
[ Name] Microsoft-Windows-Kernel-Power
[ Guid]
[ ProcessID] 4
[ ThreadID] 8
BugcheckCode 0
BugcheckParameter1 0x0
BugcheckParameter2 0x0
BugcheckParameter3 0x0
BugcheckParameter4 0x0
SleepInProgress 0
PowerButtonTimestamp 0
BootAppStatus 0
Checkpoint 0
ConnectedStandbyInProgress false
SystemSleepTransitionsToOn 0
CsEntryScenarioInstanceId 0
BugcheckInfoFromEFI true
Помощь в написании контрольных, курсовых и дипломных работ здесь.
Kernel-Power 41
Периодически, во время работы компьютера, происходят зависания с чёрным экраном, избавиться от.
Ошибка kernel power 41 (63)
Собрал компьютер ( на первом фото все компоненты).Спустя 2 недели он начал перезагружаться и.
Сейчас подожду экран смерти и скину дамп
Добавлено через 43 минуты
Сделал как указано в статье, выключил автоматическую перезагрузку, но все равно внезапно перезагрузилась система во время игры
Добавлено через 16 минут
Синего экрана нет
Добавлено через 3 часа 44 минуты
Кажется вылечилось, но не знаю из за чего точно.
1.Выключил разгон в биосе (сам я не разгонял, было по умолчанию)
2.В биосе вручную выставил частоту памяти.
3.Обновил драйвера на чипсет и сетевую карту
Добавлено через 42 минуты
Ошибочка, не решилось
Источник
What is aesm_service.exe?
aesm_service.exe is part of Intel® Software Guard Extensions and developed by Intel Corporation according to the aesm_service.exe version information.
aesm_service.exe’s description is «Intel® SGX Application Enclave Services Manager«
aesm_service.exe is digitally signed by Intel(R) Corporation.
aesm_service.exe is usually located in the ‘c:program filesintelintelsgxpswbinx64release’ folder.
If you have additional information about the file, please share it with the FreeFixer users by posting a comment at the bottom of this page.
Vendor and version information [?]
The following is the available information on aesm_service.exe:
| Property | Value |
|---|---|
| Product name | Intel® Software Guard Extensions |
| Company name | Intel Corporation |
| File description | Intel® SGX Application Enclave Services Manager |
| Internal name | AESM |
| Original filename | aesm_service.exe |
| Legal copyright | Copyright (C) 2015 Intel Corporation |
| Product version | 1, 0, 26920, 1392 |
| File version | 1, 0, 26920, 1392 |
Here’s a screenshot of the file properties when displayed by Windows Explorer:
| Product name | Intel® Software Guard Extensions |
| Company name | Intel Corporation |
| File description | Intel® SGX Application Enclave Serv.. |
| Internal name | AESM |
| Original filename | aesm_service.exe |
| Legal copyright | Copyright (C) 2015 Intel Corporation |
| Product version | 1, 0, 26920, 1392 |
| File version | 1, 0, 26920, 1392 |
Digital signatures [?]
aesm_service.exe has a valid digital signature.
| Property | Value |
|---|---|
| Signer name | Intel(R) Corporation |
| Certificate issuer name | Intel External Basic Issuing CA 3B |
| Certificate serial number | 330000b626fd4e9d165d3d97ca00020000b626 |
Hashes [?]
| Property | Value |
|---|---|
| MD5 | 1472d518e287637701623426f16dcec6 |
| SHA256 | 837d392e708b1c44bcf585d8a957f92d575a2c82dbad773202adbc3da1996aa9 |
Error Messages
These are some of the error messages that can appear related to aesm_service.exe:
aesm_service.exe has encountered a problem and needs to close. We are sorry for the inconvenience.
Intel® SGX Application Enclave Services Manager has stopped working.
aesm_service.exe is not a valid Win32 application.
What will you do with the file?
To help other users, please let us know what you will do with the file:
What did other users do?
The poll result listed below shows what users chose to do with the file. 89% have voted for removal. Based on votes from 73 users.
NOTE: Please do not use this poll as the only source of input to determine what you will do with the file.
Malware or legitimate?
If you feel that you need more information to determine if your should keep this file or remove it, please read this guide.
And now some shameless self promotion 😉
Hi, my name is Roger Karlsson. I’ve been running this website since 2006. I want to let you know about the FreeFixer program. FreeFixer is a freeware tool that analyzes your system and let you manually identify unwanted programs. Once you’ve identified some malware files, FreeFixer is pretty good at removing them. You can download FreeFixer here. It runs on Windows 2000/XP/2003/2008/2016/2019/Vista/7/8/8.1/10. Supports both 32- and 64-bit Windows.
If you have questions, feedback on FreeFixer or the freefixer.com website, need help analyzing FreeFixer’s scan result or just want to say hello, please contact me. You can find my email address at the contact page.
Comments
Please share with the other users what you think about this file. What does this file do? Is it legitimate or something that your computer is better without? Do you know how it was installed on your system? Did you install it yourself or did it come bundled with some other software? Is it running smoothly or do you get some error message? Any information that will help to document this file is welcome. Thank you for your contributions.
I’m reading all new comments so don’t hesitate to post a question about the file. If I don’t have the answer perhaps another user can help you.
Источник
@fqiu1 Happy New Year!
I am going to try some debug tool (like mitmproxy), but just for curiosity and just wondering if tcpdump will give some insights to the protocol when calling sgx_ra_get_msg1. From the packet capture below, it seems there’s no problem when we are communicating with the service: ps.sgx.trustedservices.intel.com. Also, there seems to be an Expect: 100-continue that did not continue further at the end of the packet capture. There seems to be a handshake towards the end where our server machine did not reply to. I hope this can give some insight to the issue.
Thanks a lot!
Kind Regards,
Rodel
Here’s the packet capture:
#####:~/Projects/ADV/attestation/ra_master$ sudo tcpdump -i eno1 port 80 -vv
tcpdump: listening on eno1, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 262144 bytes
15:39:58.883672 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 21455, offset 0, flags [DF], proto TCP (6), length 60)
#####.44872 > ec2-54-84-191-123.compute-1.amazonaws.com.http: Flags [S], cksum 0xb862 (incorrect -> 0x7227), seq 1470888107, win 29200, options [mss 1460,sackOK,TS val 4238180 ecr 0,nop,wscale 7], length 0
15:39:58.885539 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 58, id 0, offset 0, flags [DF], proto TCP (6), length 52)
ec2-54-84-191-123.compute-1.amazonaws.com.http > #####.44872: Flags [S.], cksum 0xbc31 (correct), seq 2289762334, ack 1470888108, win 29200, options [mss 1460,nop,nop,sackOK,nop,wscale 8], length 0
15:39:58.885590 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 21456, offset 0, flags [DF], proto TCP (6), length 40)
#####.44872 > ec2-54-84-191-123.compute-1.amazonaws.com.http: Flags [.], cksum 0xb84e (incorrect -> 0x6e30), seq 1, ack 1, win 229, length 0
15:39:58.885696 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 21457, offset 0, flags [DF], proto TCP (6), length 219)
#####.44872 > ec2-54-84-191-123.compute-1.amazonaws.com.http: Flags [P.], cksum 0xb901 (incorrect -> 0xca39), seq 1:180, ack 1, win 229, length 179: HTTP, length: 179
POST / HTTP/1.1
Host: ps.sgx.trustedservices.intel.com
Accept: /
Content-Length: 38
Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
0202754012066C4D54970000000006EQEAAgAI[!http]
15:39:58.887752 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 58, id 29475, offset 0, flags [DF], proto TCP (6), length 40)
ec2-54-84-191-123.compute-1.amazonaws.com.http > #####.44872: Flags [.], cksum 0x6deb (correct), seq 1, ack 180, win 119, length 0
15:39:59.439011 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 58, id 29476, offset 0, flags [DF], proto TCP (6), length 1496)
ec2-54-84-191-123.compute-1.amazonaws.com.http > #####.44872: Flags [P.], cksum 0x72cd (correct), seq 1:1457, ack 180, win 119, length 1456: HTTP, length: 1456
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2018 07:39:59 GMT
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Length: 1282
Connection: keep-alive
Request-ID: 99b0defc2604435bbb68ef52a9bd839b
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[!http]
15:39:59.439055 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 21458, offset 0, flags [DF], proto TCP (6), length 40)
#####.44872 > ec2-54-84-191-123.compute-1.amazonaws.com.http: Flags [.], cksum 0xb84e (incorrect -> 0x67b7), seq 180, ack 1457, win 251, length 0
15:39:59.439191 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 21459, offset 0, flags [DF], proto TCP (6), length 40)
#####.44872 > ec2-54-84-191-123.compute-1.amazonaws.com.http: Flags [F.], cksum 0xb84e (incorrect -> 0x67b6), seq 180, ack 1457, win 251, length 0
15:39:59.440484 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 58, id 29477, offset 0, flags [DF], proto TCP (6), length 40)
ec2-54-84-191-123.compute-1.amazonaws.com.http > #####.44872: Flags [F.], cksum 0x6839 (correct), seq 1457, ack 181, win 119, length 0
15:39:59.440513 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 21460, offset 0, flags [DF], proto TCP (6), length 40)
#####.44872 > ec2-54-84-191-123.compute-1.amazonaws.com.http: Flags [.], cksum 0xb84e (incorrect -> 0x67b5), seq 181, ack 1458, win 251, length 0
15:40:00.981032 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 63927, offset 0, flags [DF], proto TCP (6), length 60)
#####.44874 > ec2-54-84-191-123.compute-1.amazonaws.com.http: Flags [S], cksum 0xb862 (incorrect -> 0xbc92), seq 2937476295, win 29200, options [mss 1460,sackOK,TS val 4238704 ecr 0,nop,wscale 7], length 0
15:40:00.982231 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 58, id 0, offset 0, flags [DF], proto TCP (6), length 52)
ec2-54-84-191-123.compute-1.amazonaws.com.http > #####.44874: Flags [S.], cksum 0xcda3 (correct), seq 1793349818, ack 2937476296, win 29200, options [mss 1460,nop,nop,sackOK,nop,wscale 8], length 0
15:40:00.982284 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 63928, offset 0, flags [DF], proto TCP (6), length 40)
#####.44874 > ec2-54-84-191-123.compute-1.amazonaws.com.http: Flags [.], cksum 0xb84e (incorrect -> 0x7fa2), seq 1, ack 1, win 229, length 0
15:40:00.982409 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 63929, offset 0, flags [DF], proto TCP (6), length 205)
#####.44874 > ec2-54-84-191-123.compute-1.amazonaws.com.http: Flags [P.], cksum 0xb8f3 (incorrect -> 0x761a), seq 1:166, ack 1, win 229, length 165: HTTP, length: 165
POST / HTTP/1.1
Host: ps.sgx.trustedservices.intel.com
Accept: /
Content-Length: 1158
Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
Expect: 100-continue
15:40:00.983783 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 58, id 51945, offset 0, flags [DF], proto TCP (6), length 40)
ec2-54-84-191-123.compute-1.amazonaws.com.http > #####.44874: Flags [.], cksum 0x7f6b (correct), seq 1, ack 166, win 119, length 0
15:40:01.982767 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 63930, offset 0, flags [DF], proto TCP (6), length 1198)
#####.44874 > ec2-54-84-191-123.compute-1.amazonaws.com.http: Flags [P.], cksum 0xbcd4 (incorrect -> 0x3479), seq 166:1324, ack 1, win 229, length 1158: HTTP
15:40:01.984043 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 58, id 51946, offset 0, flags [DF], proto TCP (6), length 40)
ec2-54-84-191-123.compute-1.amazonaws.com.http > #####.44874: Flags [.], cksum 0x7adc (correct), seq 1, ack 1324, win 128, length 0
15:40:02.218786 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 58, id 51947, offset 0, flags [DF], proto TCP (6), length 65)
ec2-54-84-191-123.compute-1.amazonaws.com.http > #####.44874: Flags [P.], cksum 0x44a8 (correct), seq 1:26, ack 1324, win 128, length 25: HTTP, length: 25
HTTP/1.1 100 Continue
15:40:02.218827 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 63931, offset 0, flags [DF], proto TCP (6), length 40)
#####.44874 > ec2-54-84-191-123.compute-1.amazonaws.com.http: Flags [.], cksum 0xb84e (incorrect -> 0x7a5e), seq 1324, ack 26, win 229, length 0
15:40:32.220680 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 58, id 51948, offset 0, flags [DF], proto TCP (6), length 40)
ec2-54-84-191-123.compute-1.amazonaws.com.http > #####.44874: Flags [F.], cksum 0x7ac2 (correct), seq 26, ack 1324, win 128, length 0
15:40:32.220836 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 63932, offset 0, flags [DF], proto TCP (6), length 40)
#####.44874 > ec2-54-84-191-123.compute-1.amazonaws.com.http: Flags [F.], cksum 0xb84e (incorrect -> 0x7a5c), seq 1324, ack 27, win 229, length 0
15:40:32.221881 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 58, id 51949, offset 0, flags [DF], proto TCP (6), length 40)
ec2-54-84-191-123.compute-1.amazonaws.com.http > #####.44874: Flags [.], cksum 0x7ac1 (correct), seq 27, ack 1325, win 128, length 0
РЕКОМЕНДУЕМ: Нажмите здесь, чтобы исправить ошибки Windows и оптимизировать производительность системы
Процесс, известный как Intel® SGX Application Enclave Services Manager, относится к программному обеспечению Intel Software Guard Extensions или Intel® Software Guard Extensions Platform от Intel (www.intel.com).
Описание: Aesm_service.exe не является необходимым для ОС Windows и вызывает относительно немного проблем. Файл aesm_service.exe находится в подпапках C: Windows System32 (в основном C: Windows System32 DriverStore FileRepository sgx_psw.inf_amd64_9008c589d5116a6b или C: Windows System32 DriverStore FileRepository sgx_66_764_764) .98_764_6464 ). Известные размеры файлов в Windows 10/8/7 / XP составляют 3 367 272 байта (33% всех вхождений), 3 364 640 байтов, 720 104 байтов или 3235 112 байтов. Это сервис, и имя сервиса AESMService. Агент управления системными службами для приложений с поддержкой Intel Software Guard Extensions.
Файл aesm_service.exe является файлом, подписанным Microsoft. Программа не имеет видимого окна. Файл имеет цифровую подпись. Файл не является основным файлом Windows. Aesm_service.exe способен мониторить приложения и манипулировать другими программами. Поэтому технический рейтинг надежности 3% опасности .
Если aesm_service.exe находится в подпапках «C: Program Files», тогда рейтинг надежности 14% опасности . Размер файла составляет 3 744 904 байта (66% всех вхождений) или 3 089 680 байтов. Вы можете удалить эту программу в панели управления. Программа не имеет видимого окна. Файл aesm_service.exe сертифицирован надежной компанией. Это не системный файл Windows. Это файл aesm_service.exe. Aesm_service.exe способен мониторить приложения и манипулировать другими программами.
Деинсталляция этого варианта: Если у вас по-прежнему возникают проблемы с aesm_service.exe, вы также можете полностью удалить платформу расширений Intel® Software Guard (Панель управления ⇒ Удалить программу).
Важно: некоторые вредоносные программы маскируют себя как aesm_service.exe, особенно если они находятся в папке C: Windows или C: Windows System32. Поэтому вы должны проверить процесс aesm_service.exe на вашем компьютере, чтобы увидеть, если это угроза. Мы рекомендуем Security Task Manager для проверки безопасности вашего компьютера. Это был один из лучших вариантов загрузки The Washington Post и PC World .
Аккуратный и опрятный компьютер — это главное требование для избежания проблем с aesm_service. Это означает запуск сканирования на наличие вредоносных программ, очистку жесткого диска с использованием 1 cleanmgr и 2 sfc / scannow, 3 удаления ненужных программ, проверку наличия программ автозапуска (с использованием 4 msconfig) и включение автоматического обновления Windows 5. Всегда не забывайте выполнять периодическое резервное копирование или, по крайней мере, устанавливать точки восстановления.
Если вы столкнулись с реальной проблемой, попробуйте вспомнить последнее, что вы сделали, или последнее, что вы установили до того, как проблема появилась впервые. Используйте команду 6 resmon, чтобы определить процессы, которые вызывают вашу проблему. Даже для серьезных проблем, вместо переустановки Windows, лучше восстановить вашу установку или, для Windows 8 и более поздних версий, выполнить команду 7 DISM.exe / Online / Cleanup-image / Restorehealth. Это позволяет восстанавливать операционную систему без потери данных.
Security Task Manager показывает все запущенные сервисы Windows, включая внедренные скрытые приложения (например, мониторинг клавиатуры или браузера, авто вход). Уникальный рейтинг риска безопасности указывает на вероятность того, что процесс является потенциальным шпионским ПО, вредоносным ПО или трояном. B Malwarebytes Anti-Malware обнаруживает и удаляет спящие шпионские, рекламные программы, трояны, клавиатурные шпионы, вредоносные программы и трекеры с вашего жесткого диска.
Связанный файл:
phonecompanionpusher.exe javaupdatescheduler.exe bjpsmain.exe aesm_service.exe wahelper.exe chromodo.exe isesrv.exe vsb.sys hsdservice.exe sysrun.bat ideatouch.