I want to use django-storages
to store my model files in Amazon S3 but I get Access Denied
error. I have granted the user almost all S3 permission PutObject, ListBucketMultipartUploads, ListMultipartUploadParts, AbortMultipartUpload permissions, etc. on all resources but this didn’t fix it.
settings.py
...
DEFAULT_FILE_STORAGE = 'storages.backends.s3boto3.S3Boto3Storage'
AWS_S3_REGION_NAME = 'eu-west-1'
AWS_S3_CUSTOM_DOMAIN = 'www.xyz.com'
AWS_DEFAULT_ACL = None
AWS_STORAGE_BUCKET_NAME = 'www.xyz.com'
...
Using the Django shell, I tried to use the storage system as shown below.
Python 3.6.6 (default, Sep 12 2018, 18:26:19)
[GCC 8.0.1 20180414 (experimental) [trunk revision 259383]] on linux
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
(InteractiveConsole)
>>> import os
>>> AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID = os.environ.get( 'AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID', 'anything' )
>>> AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY = os.environ.get( 'AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY', 'anything' )
>>> AWS_DEFAULT_ACL = 'public-read'
>>> from django.core.files.storage import default_storage
>>> file = default_storage.open('test', 'w')
...
>>> file.write('storage contents')
2018-09-27 16:41:42,596 botocore.hooks [DEBUG] Event before-parameter-build.s3.CreateMultipartUpload: calling handler <function validate_ascii_metadata at 0x7fdb5e848d08>
2018-09-27 16:41:42,596 botocore.hooks [DEBUG] Event before-parameter-build.s3.CreateMultipartUpload: calling handler <function sse_md5 at 0x7fdb5e848158>
2018-09-27 16:41:42,597 botocore.hooks [DEBUG] Event before-parameter-build.s3.CreateMultipartUpload: calling handler <function validate_bucket_name at 0x7fdb5e8480d0>
2018-09-27 16:41:42,597 botocore.hooks [DEBUG] Event before-parameter-build.s3.CreateMultipartUpload: calling handler <bound method S3RegionRedirector.redirect_from_cache of <botocore.utils.S3RegionRedirector object at 0x7fdb5c5d1128>>
2018-09-27 16:41:42,597 botocore.hooks [DEBUG] Event before-parameter-build.s3.CreateMultipartUpload: calling handler <function generate_idempotent_uuid at 0x7fdb5e846c80>
2018-09-27 16:41:42,598 botocore.hooks [DEBUG] Event before-call.s3.CreateMultipartUpload: calling handler <function add_expect_header at 0x7fdb5e848598>
2018-09-27 16:41:42,598 botocore.hooks [DEBUG] Event before-call.s3.CreateMultipartUpload: calling handler <bound method S3RegionRedirector.set_request_url of <botocore.utils.S3RegionRedirector object at 0x7fdb5c5d1128>>
2018-09-27 16:41:42,598 botocore.endpoint [DEBUG] Making request for OperationModel(name=CreateMultipartUpload) with params: {'url_path': '/www.xyz.com/test?uploads', 'query_string': {}, 'method': 'POST', 'headers': {'Content-Type': 'application/octet-stream', 'User-Agent': 'Boto3/1.7.80 Python/3.6.6 Linux/4.14.67-66.56.amzn1.x86_64 Botocore/1.11.1 Resource'}, 'body': b'', 'url': 'https://s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/www.xyz.com/test?uploads', 'context': {'client_region': 'eu-west-1', 'client_config': <botocore.config.Config object at 0x7fdb5c8e80b8>, 'has_streaming_input': False, 'auth_type': None, 'signing': {'bucket': 'www.xyz.com'}}}
2018-09-27 16:41:42,599 botocore.hooks [DEBUG] Event request-created.s3.CreateMultipartUpload: calling handler <bound method RequestSigner.handler of <botocore.signers.RequestSigner object at 0x7fdb5c8db780>>
2018-09-27 16:41:42,599 botocore.hooks [DEBUG] Event choose-signer.s3.CreateMultipartUpload: calling handler <bound method ClientCreator._default_s3_presign_to_sigv2 of <botocore.client.ClientCreator object at 0x7fdb5cabff98>>
2018-09-27 16:41:42,599 botocore.hooks [DEBUG] Event choose-signer.s3.CreateMultipartUpload: calling handler <function set_operation_specific_signer at 0x7fdb5e846b70>
2018-09-27 16:41:42,599 botocore.hooks [DEBUG] Event before-sign.s3.CreateMultipartUpload: calling handler <function fix_s3_host at 0x7fdb5e983048>
2018-09-27 16:41:42,600 botocore.utils [DEBUG] Checking for DNS compatible bucket for: https://s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/www.xyz.com/test?uploads
2018-09-27 16:41:42,600 botocore.utils [DEBUG] Not changing URI, bucket is not DNS compatible: www.xyz.com
2018-09-27 16:41:42,601 botocore.auth [DEBUG] Calculating signature using v4 auth.
2018-09-27 16:41:42,601 botocore.auth [DEBUG] CanonicalRequest:
POST
/www.xyz.com/test
uploads=
content-type:application/octet-stream
host:s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com
x-amz-content-sha256:e3b0c44298fc1c149afbf343ddd27ae41e4649b934ca495991b7852b855
x-amz-date:20180927T164142Z
content-type;host;x-amz-content-sha256;x-amz-date
e3b0c44298fc1c149afb65gdfg33441e4649b934ca495991b7852b855
2018-09-27 16:41:42,601 botocore.auth [DEBUG] StringToSign:
AWS4-HMAC-SHA256
20180927T164142Z
20180927/eu-west-1/s3/aws4_request
8649ef591fb64412e923359a4sfvvffdd6d00915b9756d1611b38e346ae
2018-09-27 16:41:42,602 botocore.auth [DEBUG] Signature:
61db9afe5f87730a75692af5a95ggffdssd6f4e8e712d85c414edb14f
2018-09-27 16:41:42,602 botocore.endpoint [DEBUG] Sending http request: <AWSPreparedRequest stream_output=False, method=POST, url=https://s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/www.xyz.com/test?uploads, headers={'Content-Type': b'application/octet-stream', 'User-Agent': b'Boto3/1.7.80 Python/3.6.6 Linux/4.14.67-66.56.amzn1.x86_64 Botocore/1.11.1 Resource', 'X-Amz-Date': b'20180927T164142Z', 'X-Amz-Content-SHA256': b'e3b0c44298fc1c149afbf4c8996fbdsdsffdss649b934ca495991b7852b855', 'Authorization': b'AWS4-HMAC-SHA256 Credential=X1234567890/20180927/eu-west-1/s3/aws4_request, SignedHeaders=content-type;host;x-amz-content-sha256;x-amz-date, Signature=61db9afe5f87730a7sdfsdfs20b7137cf5d6f4e8e712d85c414edb14f', 'Content-Length': '0'}>
2018-09-27 16:41:42,638 botocore.parsers [DEBUG] Response headers: {'x-amz-request-id': '9E879E78E4883471', 'x-amz-id-2': 'ZkCfOMwLoD08Yy4Nzfxsdfdsdfds3y9wLxzqFw+o3175I+QEdtdtAi8vIEH1vi9iq9VGUC98GqlE=', 'Content-Type': 'application/xml', 'Transfer-Encoding': 'chunked', 'Date': 'Thu, 27 Sep 2018 16:41:42 GMT', 'Server': 'AmazonS3'}
2018-09-27 16:41:42,639 botocore.parsers [DEBUG] Response body:
b'<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>n<Error><Code>AccessDenied</Code><Message>Access Denied</Message><RequestId>9E879E78E4883471</RequestId><HostId>ZkCfOMwLoD08Yy4Nzfxo8RpzsdfsdfsxzqFw+o3175I+QEdtdtAi8vIEH1vi9iq9VGUC98GqlE=</HostId></Error>'
2018-09-27 16:41:42,639 botocore.hooks [DEBUG] Event needs-retry.s3.CreateMultipartUpload: calling handler <botocore.retryhandler.RetryHandler object at 0x7fdb5c618ac8>
2018-09-27 16:41:42,640 botocore.retryhandler [DEBUG] No retry needed.
2018-09-27 16:41:42,640 botocore.hooks [DEBUG] Event needs-retry.s3.CreateMultipartUpload: calling handler <bound method S3RegionRedirector.redirect_from_error of <botocore.utils.S3RegionRedirector object at 0x7fdb5c5d1128>>
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<console>", line 1, in <module>
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages/storages/backends/s3boto3.py", line 127, in write
self._multipart = self.obj.initiate_multipart_upload(**parameters)
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages/boto3/resources/factory.py", line 520, in do_action
response = action(self, *args, **kwargs)
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages/boto3/resources/action.py", line 83, in __call__
response = getattr(parent.meta.client, operation_name)(**params)
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages/botocore/client.py", line 314, in _api_call
return self._make_api_call(operation_name, kwargs)
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages/botocore/client.py", line 612, in _make_api_call
raise error_class(parsed_response, operation_name)
botocore.exceptions.ClientError: An error occurred (AccessDenied) when calling the CreateMultipartUpload operation: Access Denied
These are the versions I’m using.
boto3==1.7.80
botocore==1.11.1
Django==2.1
s3transfer==0.1.13
django-storages==1.7.1
Why is it raising an exception?
I’m doing multipart upload via aws cli console but getting this error;
A client error (AccessDenied) occurred when calling the CreateMultipartUpload operation: Access Denied
Below is my policy, am I missing something in there?
Thanks.
{
"Version": "2012-10-17",
"Statement": [
{
"Effect": "Allow",
"Action": [
"s3:ListAllMyBuckets"
],
"Resource": "arn:aws:s3:::*"
},
{
"Effect": "Allow",
"Action": [
"s3:ListBucket",
"s3:GetBucketLocation"
],
"Resource": "arn:aws:s3:::mybucket"
},
{
"Effect": "Allow",
"Action": [
"s3:PutObject",
"s3:GetObject",
"s3:DeleteObject",
"s3:CreateMultipartUpload",
"s3:AbortMultipartUpload",
"s3:ListMultipartUploadParts",
"s3:ListBucketMultipartUploads"
],
"Resource": "arn:aws:s3:::mybucket/*"
}
]
}
Содержание
- DVC tutorial — error pushing data to the cloud #1231
- Comments
- Why am I getting an Access Denied error message when I upload files to my Amazon S3 bucket that has AWS KMS default encryption?
- Resolution
- «An error occurred (AccessDenied) when calling the PutObject operation: Access Denied»
- «An error occurred (AccessDenied) when calling the CreateMultipartUpload operation: Access Denied»
- DVC tutorial — error pushing data to the cloud #1231
- Comments
- Отказано в доступе при вызове операции PutObject с разрешением на уровне корзины
DVC tutorial — error pushing data to the cloud #1231
In section 4.1, «Pushing data to the cloud», I am running into the following error:
dvc push
Warning: Using obsoleted config format. Consider updating.
Preparing to push data to s3://dvc-share/classify
[###### ] 20% Collecting informationError: Failed to push data to the cloud: ‘NoneType’ object has no attribute ‘session’
Setup info:
dvc —version
0.19.12
macOS Mojave v10.14, dvc installed using pip
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Could you please run dvc push -v (notice the -v flag, that increases log verbosity) and show us the output? Also, could you show us your .dvc/config?
cat .dvc/config
[core]
cloud = AWS
[AWS]
StoragePath = dvc-share/classify
Thank you! Looks like you don’t have boto3 installed, and it wasn’t detected by dvc beforehand for some reason(looking into it right now). Could you please try running pip install —upgrade dvc[s3] and try running dvc push again?
I was able to reproduce it. Running pip install —upgrade dvc[s3] or pip install boto3 does the trick and everything starts to work fine. The bug is in that dvc doesn’t detect that boto3 is missing and doesn’t report it ahead of time when using a legacy config format that is used in the tutorial. With newer config, dvc does indeed detect the absence of boto3 and gives hint about it:
Preparing a patch to for that right now.
Btw the most recent and up to date docs/tutorials are available at https://dvc.org/documentation , please feel free to try it out as well 🙂
Thank you so much for the feedback!
Thank you — that seems to have worked as far at the boto-3 error is concerned. Now it fails with an access denied error msg.
Error: Failed to upload — An error occurred (AccessDenied) when calling the CreateMultipartUpload operation: Access Denied
Is that because I’m using an out of date tutorial?
Источник
Why am I getting an Access Denied error message when I upload files to my Amazon S3 bucket that has AWS KMS default encryption?
My Amazon Simple Storage Service (Amazon S3) bucket has AWS Key Management Service (AWS KMS) default encryption. I’m trying to upload files to the bucket, but Amazon S3 returns an Access Denied error message. How can I fix this?
Resolution
- Your AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) user or role has s3:PutObject permission on the bucket.
- Your AWS KMS key doesn’t have an «aws/s3» alias. This alias can’t be used for default bucket encryption if cross-account IAM principals are uploading the objects. For more information about AWS KMS keys and policy management, see Protecting data using server-side encryption with AWS Key Management Service (SSE-KMS).
Then, update the AWS KMS permissions of your IAM user or role based on the error message that you receive.
Important:
- If the AWS KMS key and IAM role belong to different AWS accounts, then the IAM policy and KMS key policy must be updated. Make sure to add the KMS permissions to both the IAM policy and KMS key policy.
- To use an IAM policy to control access to a KMS key, the key policy for the KMS key must give the account permission to use IAM policies.
«An error occurred (AccessDenied) when calling the PutObject operation: Access Denied»
This error message indicates that your IAM user or role needs permission for the kms:GenerateDataKey action.
Follow these steps to add permission for kms:GenerateDataKey:
2. Choose the IAM user or role that you’re using to upload files to the Amazon S3 bucket.
3. In the Permissions tab, expand each policy to view its JSON policy document.
4. In the JSON policy documents, look for policies related to AWS KMS access. Review statements with «Effect»: «Allow» to check if the user or role has permissions for the kms:GenerateDataKey action on the bucket’s AWS KMS key.
5. If this permission is missing, then add the permission to the appropriate policy. For instructions, see Adding permissions to a user (console) or Modifying a role permissions policy (console).
6. In the JSON policy documents, look for statements with «Effect»: «Deny». Confirm that those statements don’t deny the s3:PutObject action on the bucket. The statements must not deny the IAM user or role access to the kms:GenerateDataKey action on the key used to encrypt the bucket. Also, the required KMS and S3 permissions must not be restricted when using VPC endpoint policies, service control policies, permissions boundaries, or session policies.
«An error occurred (AccessDenied) when calling the CreateMultipartUpload operation: Access Denied»
This error message indicates that your IAM user or role needs permission for the kms:GenerateDataKey and kms:Decrypt actions.
Follow these steps to add permissions for kms:GenerateDataKey and kms:Decrypt:
2. Choose the IAM user or role that you’re using to upload files to the Amazon S3 bucket.
3. In the Permissions tab, expand each policy to view its JSON policy document.
4. In the JSON policy documents, look for policies related to AWS KMS access. Review statements with «Effect»: «Allow» to check if the role has permissions for kms:GenerateDataKey and kms:Decrypt on the bucket’s AWS KMS key.
5. If these permissions are missing, then add the permissions to the appropriate policy. For instructions, see Adding permissions to a user (console) or Modifying a role permissions policy (console).
6. In the JSON policy documents, look for statements with «Effect»: «Deny». Then, confirm that those statements don’t deny the s3:PutObject action on the bucket. The statements must not deny the IAM user or role access to the kms:GenerateDataKey and kms:Decrypt actions on the key used to encrypt the bucket. Also, the required KMS and S3 permissions must not be restricted when using VPC endpoint policies, service control policies, permissions boundaries, or session policies.
Источник
DVC tutorial — error pushing data to the cloud #1231
In section 4.1, «Pushing data to the cloud», I am running into the following error:
dvc push
Warning: Using obsoleted config format. Consider updating.
Preparing to push data to s3://dvc-share/classify
[###### ] 20% Collecting informationError: Failed to push data to the cloud: ‘NoneType’ object has no attribute ‘session’
Setup info:
dvc —version
0.19.12
macOS Mojave v10.14, dvc installed using pip
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Could you please run dvc push -v (notice the -v flag, that increases log verbosity) and show us the output? Also, could you show us your .dvc/config?
cat .dvc/config
[core]
cloud = AWS
[AWS]
StoragePath = dvc-share/classify
Thank you! Looks like you don’t have boto3 installed, and it wasn’t detected by dvc beforehand for some reason(looking into it right now). Could you please try running pip install —upgrade dvc[s3] and try running dvc push again?
I was able to reproduce it. Running pip install —upgrade dvc[s3] or pip install boto3 does the trick and everything starts to work fine. The bug is in that dvc doesn’t detect that boto3 is missing and doesn’t report it ahead of time when using a legacy config format that is used in the tutorial. With newer config, dvc does indeed detect the absence of boto3 and gives hint about it:
Preparing a patch to for that right now.
Btw the most recent and up to date docs/tutorials are available at https://dvc.org/documentation , please feel free to try it out as well 🙂
Thank you so much for the feedback!
Thank you — that seems to have worked as far at the boto-3 error is concerned. Now it fails with an access denied error msg.
Error: Failed to upload — An error occurred (AccessDenied) when calling the CreateMultipartUpload operation: Access Denied
Is that because I’m using an out of date tutorial?
Источник
Отказано в доступе при вызове операции PutObject с разрешением на уровне корзины
Затем я протестировал конфигурацию с помощью плагина W3 Total Cache WordPress. Тест не удался.
Я также попытался воспроизвести проблему, используя
и это не удалось с
Почему я не могу загрузить в корзину?
Чтобы ответить на мой собственный вопрос:
Политика примера предоставила доступ PutObject, но мне также пришлось предоставить доступ PutObjectAcl.
Мне пришлось изменить
Вам также необходимо убедиться, что ваша корзина настроена для того, чтобы клиенты устанавливали общедоступный ACL, сняв отметки с этих двух полей:
У меня была аналогичная проблема. Я не использовал ACL, поэтому мне это не понадобилось s3:PutObjectAcl .
В моем случае я делал (в Serverless Framework YML):
Что добавляет /* в конец корзины ARN.
Надеюсь это поможет.
Я просто бился головой о стену, просто пытаясь заставить загрузку S3 работать с большими файлами. Изначально моя ошибка была:
Затем я попытался скопировать файл меньшего размера и получил:
Я мог нормально перечислять объекты, но больше ничего не мог делать, хотя у меня были s3:* разрешения в моей политике ролей. В итоге я переработал политику так:
Теперь я могу загрузить любой файл. Замените my-bucket своим именем корзины. Я надеюсь, что это поможет кому-то еще, кто переживает это.
Если это поможет кому-то еще, в моем случае я использовал CMK (он отлично работал с ключом aws / s3 по умолчанию)
Мне пришлось войти в свое определение ключа шифрования в IAM и добавить программного пользователя, вошедшего в boto3, в список пользователей, которые «могут использовать этот ключ для шифрования и дешифрования данных из приложений и при использовании сервисов AWS, интегрированных с KMS».
У меня была аналогичная проблема с загрузкой в корзину S3, защищенную шифрованием KWS. У меня есть минимальная политика, которая позволяет добавлять объекты под определенным ключом s3.
Мне нужно было добавить следующие разрешения KMS в мою политику, чтобы позволить роли помещать объекты в корзину. (Может быть немного больше, чем требуется)
У меня было такое же сообщение об ошибке, которое я сделал: убедитесь, что вы используете правильный s3 uri, например: s3://my-bucket-name/
(Если my-bucket-name явно находится в корне вашего aws s3)
Я настаиваю на этом, потому что при копировании и вставке корзины s3 из вашего браузера вы получаете что-то вроде https://s3.console.aws.amazon.com/s3/buckets/my-bucket-name/?region=my-aws-regiontab=overview
Таким образом, я совершил ошибку, использовав s3://buckets/my-bucket-name какие рейзы:
An error occurred (AccessDenied) when calling the PutObject operation: Access Denied
Источник
When you deploy with SAM CLI utilizing sam deploy
, you would possibly get the following error:
Error: Unable to add artifact <YourComponent> referenced by ContentUri parameter of <YourComponent> useful resource.
An error occurred (AccessDenied) when calling the CreateMultipartUpload operation: Access Denied.
Try to unravel this error by doing the following test:
- Check your aws configuration by operating
aws configure listing
, if not, runaws configure
to switch it, be certain that your IAM consumer have all the vital permissions. - Build your app first by operating
sam construct --use-container
, after which runsam deploy --guided
if that is your first time to deploy.
Now for those who see the following error:
Error: Failed to create changeset for the stack: <YourStack>, ex: Waiter ChangeSetCreateComplete failed: Waiter encountered a terminal failure state: For expression "Status" we matched anticipated path: "FAILED" Status: FAILED. Reason: Requires capabilities : [CAPABILITY_NAMED_IAM]
Try to run sam deploy --capabilities CAPABILITY_NAMED_IAM
Read More:
Post Views: 0
My Amazon Simple Storage Service (Amazon S3) bucket has AWS Key Management Service (AWS KMS) default encryption. I’m trying to upload files to the bucket, but Amazon S3 returns an Access Denied error message. How can I fix this?
Resolution
First, confirm:
- Your AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) user or role has s3:PutObject permission on the bucket.
- Your AWS KMS key doesn’t have an «aws/s3» alias. This alias can’t be used for default bucket encryption if cross-account IAM principals are uploading the objects. For more information about AWS KMS keys and policy management, see Protecting data using server-side encryption with AWS Key Management Service (SSE-KMS).
Then, update the AWS KMS permissions of your IAM user or role based on the error message that you receive.
Important:
- If the AWS KMS key and IAM role belong to different AWS accounts, then the IAM policy and KMS key policy must be updated. Make sure to add the KMS permissions to both the IAM policy and KMS key policy.
- To use an IAM policy to control access to a KMS key, the key policy for the KMS key must give the account permission to use IAM policies.
«An error occurred (AccessDenied) when calling the PutObject operation: Access Denied»
This error message indicates that your IAM user or role needs permission for the kms:GenerateDataKey action.
Follow these steps to add permission for kms:GenerateDataKey:
1. Open the IAM console.
2. Choose the IAM user or role that you’re using to upload files to the Amazon S3 bucket.
3. In the Permissions tab, expand each policy to view its JSON policy document.
4. In the JSON policy documents, look for policies related to AWS KMS access. Review statements with «Effect»: «Allow» to check if the user or role has permissions for the kms:GenerateDataKey action on the bucket’s AWS KMS key.
5. If this permission is missing, then add the permission to the appropriate policy. For instructions, see Adding permissions to a user (console) or Modifying a role permissions policy (console).
6. In the JSON policy documents, look for statements with «Effect»: «Deny». Confirm that those statements don’t deny the s3:PutObject action on the bucket. The statements must not deny the IAM user or role access to the kms:GenerateDataKey action on the key used to encrypt the bucket. Also, the required KMS and S3 permissions must not be restricted when using VPC endpoint policies, service control policies, permissions boundaries, or session policies.
«An error occurred (AccessDenied) when calling the CreateMultipartUpload operation: Access Denied»
This error message indicates that your IAM user or role needs permission for the kms:GenerateDataKey and kms:Decrypt actions.
Follow these steps to add permissions for kms:GenerateDataKey and kms:Decrypt:
1. Open the IAM console.
2. Choose the IAM user or role that you’re using to upload files to the Amazon S3 bucket.
3. In the Permissions tab, expand each policy to view its JSON policy document.
4. In the JSON policy documents, look for policies related to AWS KMS access. Review statements with «Effect»: «Allow» to check if the role has permissions for kms:GenerateDataKey and kms:Decrypt on the bucket’s AWS KMS key.
5. If these permissions are missing, then add the permissions to the appropriate policy. For instructions, see Adding permissions to a user (console) or Modifying a role permissions policy (console).
6. In the JSON policy documents, look for statements with «Effect»: «Deny». Then, confirm that those statements don’t deny the s3:PutObject action on the bucket. The statements must not deny the IAM user or role access to the kms:GenerateDataKey and kms:Decrypt actions on the key used to encrypt the bucket. Also, the required KMS and S3 permissions must not be restricted when using VPC endpoint policies, service control policies, permissions boundaries, or session policies.
Related information
Setting default server-side encryption behavior for Amazon S3 buckets
UPDATE: everything works fine the next day!?! So I think the answer might be that you have to wait some period of time, either after creating a new IAM user, or after creating a new bucket, before uploads will work.
I created a dedicated IAM user, then did aws configure
, and gave the key, and specified the «eu-west-1» region. I can see the correct information in ~/.aws/config.
I tried aws s3 mb s3://backup
but got told it already existed. aws s3 ls
confirmed it did not. However aws s3 mb s3://backup-specialtest
did work.
But when I try aws s3 cp test.tgz s3://backup-specialtest
I get:
A client error (AccessDenied) occurred when calling the CreateMultipartUpload operation: Anonymous users cannot initiate multipart uploads. Please authenticate.
It is not just big files that are the problem. I made a 6-byte text file, and tried to upload with aws s3 cp test.txt s3://backup-specialtest/
but get:
upload failed: ./test.txt to s3://backup-specialtest/test.txt A client error (AccessDenied) occurred when calling the PutObject operation: Access Denied
Trying aws s3 ls s3://backup-specialtest
gives me:
A client error (AccessDenied) occurred when calling the ListObjects operation: Access Denied
Trying aws s3api get-bucket-acl --bucket backup-specialtest
gives me:
A client error (AccessDenied) occurred when calling the GetBucketAcl operation: Access Denied
I had already attached the «AmazonS3FullAccess» policy to my user, in the AWS web console. When I click show policy I get:
{
"Version": "2012-10-17",
"Statement": [
{
"Effect": "Allow",
"Action": "s3:*",
"Resource": "*"
}
]
}
That looks good: he can do all S3 actions, on all resources.
While writing this I thought I’d double-check I could still create a new bucket, and hadn’t broken anything along the way. So I tried aws s3 mb s3://another-test
and got:
make_bucket failed: s3://another-test/ A client error (BucketAlreadyExists) occurred when calling the CreateBucket operation: The requested bucket name is not available. The bucket namespace is shared by all users of the system. Please select a different name and try again.
But when I try: aws s3 mb s3://another-test-2
I get success:
make_bucket: s3://another-test-2/
And it is there: aws s3 ls
2015-11-13 11:07:10 another-test-2
2015-11-13 10:18:53 backup-specialtest
2014-08-05 21:00:33 something-older
(That last bucket appears to have been created by the root user, last year, and is empty.)
Miguel 2488
Guest
-
#1
Miguel 2488 Asks: An error occurred (AccessDenied) when calling the CreateMultipartUpload operation: Access Denied
I’m having the error mentioned in the title when trying to upload a large file (15gb) to my s3 bucket from a Sagemaker notebook instance.
I know that there are some similar questions here that i have already visited. I have gone through this, this, and this question, but after following the steps mentioned, and applying the policies described in these questions i still have the same error.
I have also come to this documentation page eventually. The problem is that when i go into my users page in the IAM section, i see no users. I can see some roles but no users and i don’t know which role should i edit following the steps mentioned in the documentation page. Also, my bucket DON’T have encryption enabled so i’m not really sure that the steps in the documentation page will fix the error for me.
This is the policy in currently using for my bucket:
Code:
{
"Version": "2012-10-17",
"Id": "Policy1",
"Statement": [
{
"Sid": "Statement1",
"Effect": "Allow",
"Principal": {
"AWS": "arn:aws:iam::XXXX:root"
},
"Action": "s3:*",
"Resource": [
"arn:aws:s3:::bauer-bucket",
"arn:aws:s3:::bauer-bucket/*"
]
}
]
}
I’m totally lost with this, i need to upload that file to my bucket. Please help.
Thanks in advance.
SolveForum.com may not be responsible for the answers or solutions given to any question asked by the users. All Answers or responses are user generated answers and we do not have proof of its validity or correctness. Please vote for the answer that helped you in order to help others find out which is the most helpful answer. Questions labeled as solved may be solved or may not be solved depending on the type of question and the date posted for some posts may be scheduled to be deleted periodically. Do not hesitate to share your response here to help other visitors like you. Thank you, solveforum.
- Anshu
- 10 minutes ago
- Computer Science
- Replies: 0
Anshu Asks: detectron2 torch.onnx.export gives device error for all oprtions [cpu, cuda:0 , 0]
I am trying to export an object detection model trained with detectron2 framework. I am using latest 0.6 version. With the export_model script provided in detectron2, i am unable to export onnx model because of device error.
I have tried all 4 options for MODEL.DEVICE parameter :
- 0
- cuda
- cuda:0
- cpu
The error still persists even if i skip passing MODEL.DEVICE while executing export_model
export_model.py», line 165, in export_tracing torch.onnx.export(traceable_model, image, os.path.join(args.output, «model.onnx»), opset_version=13, verbose=True)
envs/detectron/lib/python3.9/site-packages/torch/onnx/symbolic_helper.py», line 64, in _parse_arg return int(tval) ValueError: invalid literal for int() with base 10: ‘cuda:0’
Thank you for your help.
SolveForum.com may not be responsible for the answers or solutions given to any question asked by the users. All Answers or responses are user generated answers and we do not have proof of its validity or correctness. Please vote for the answer that helped you in order to help others find out which is the most helpful answer. Questions labeled as solved may be solved or may not be solved depending on the type of question and the date posted for some posts may be scheduled to be deleted periodically. Do not hesitate to share your thoughts here to help others.
- Sahil
- 10 minutes ago
- Computer Science
- Replies: 0
Sahil Asks: Handling encoding of a dataset which has more than total 2000 columns
Whenever we have a dataset to be pre processed, before feeding it to the model we convert the categorical values to numerical values for which we generally use LabelEncoding, One Hot encoding etc techniques but all these are done manually going through each column.
But what if are dataset is huge in terms of columns(eg : 2000 columns), here it wont be possible to go through each column manually, in such cases how do we handle encoding?
Are there any specific libraries available which deal with automatic encoding of variable? I know of category_encoders which provides with different encoding techniques but how do we do it at in the above mentioned condition.
SolveForum.com may not be responsible for the answers or solutions given to any question asked by the users. All Answers or responses are user generated answers and we do not have proof of its validity or correctness. Please vote for the answer that helped you in order to help others find out which is the most helpful answer. Questions labeled as solved may be solved or may not be solved depending on the type of question and the date posted for some posts may be scheduled to be deleted periodically. Do not hesitate to share your thoughts here to help others.
- Rpandia31
- 10 minutes ago
- Geography
- Replies: 0
Rpandia31 Asks: Qgis python to apply polygon Symbology
I have polygon featureclass. which is shown in map as
I want to «outline xpattern» symbology
I am not able to do it programmatically by python.
Few of my attempts are:
Code:
Attempt1:
layer = QgsProject.instance().mapLayersByName("New_Shapefile")[0] # replace "polygon_layer_name" with the actual name of your polygon layer
symbol = QgsFillSymbol.createSimple({'outline_style': 'no', 'outline_width': '0.26', 'outline_color': '0,0,0,255', 'pattern': '20'})
renderer = QgsSingleSymbolRenderer(symbol)
layer.setRenderer(renderer)
layer.triggerRepaint()
Attempt 2:
layer = QgsProject.instance().mapLayersByName("polygon_layer_name")[0] # replace "polygon_layer_name" with the actual name of your polygon layer
fill_symbol = QgsFillSymbol.createSimple({'color': '247,247,247,255'})
layer_1 = QgsFillSymbolLayer(fill_symbol)
layer_2 = QgsFillSymbolLayer(fill_symbol)
layer_3 = QgsFillSymbolLayer(fill_symbol)
symbol = QgsFillSymbol([layer_1, layer_2, layer_3])
renderer = QgsSingleSymbolRenderer(symbol)
layer.setRenderer(renderer)
layer.triggerRepaint()```
SolveForum.com may not be responsible for the answers or solutions given to any question asked by the users. All Answers or responses are user generated answers and we do not have proof of its validity or correctness. Please vote for the answer that helped you in order to help others find out which is the most helpful answer. Questions labeled as solved may be solved or may not be solved depending on the type of question and the date posted for some posts may be scheduled to be deleted periodically. Do not hesitate to share your response here to help other visitors like you. Thank you, solveforum.
- Devlyn R
- 10 minutes ago
- Geography
- Replies: 0
Devlyn R Asks: Locating project templates in ArcGIS Pro?
Does anyone know where the blank, global, scene and map aptx files in ArcGIS Pro are stored?
I notice that any project settings that you change, persist. I’m trying to get my blank.aptx to go back to what it looked like the first time I used it.
SolveForum.com may not be responsible for the answers or solutions given to any question asked by the users. All Answers or responses are user generated answers and we do not have proof of its validity or correctness. Please vote for the answer that helped you in order to help others find out which is the most helpful answer. Questions labeled as solved may be solved or may not be solved depending on the type of question and the date posted for some posts may be scheduled to be deleted periodically. Do not hesitate to share your response here to help other visitors like you. Thank you, solveforum.
- KlausK
- 10 minutes ago
- Physics
- Replies: 0
KlausK Asks: Has the entropy of a single photon ever beed measured?
The entropy of single photons is some factor of order unity times the Boltzmann constant. The quantity has been discussed in many theoretical papers.
Have measurements of the single-photon entropy ever been performed or published? Google Scholar yields nothing on the issue.
SolveForum.com may not be responsible for the answers or solutions given to any question asked by the users. All Answers or responses are user generated answers and we do not have proof of its validity or correctness. Please vote for the answer that helped you in order to help others find out which is the most helpful answer. Questions labeled as solved may be solved or may not be solved depending on the type of question and the date posted for some posts may be scheduled to be deleted periodically. Do not hesitate to share your thoughts here to help others.
- Chris Glass
- 10 minutes ago
- Physics
- Replies: 0
Chris Glass Asks: why didnt early universe collapse into black hole? [duplicate]
Given the early universe was infinatly small, why didnt it immediatly collapse into a blackhole before it had time to expand ?
SolveForum.com may not be responsible for the answers or solutions given to any question asked by the users. All Answers or responses are user generated answers and we do not have proof of its validity or correctness. Please vote for the answer that helped you in order to help others find out which is the most helpful answer. Questions labeled as solved may be solved or may not be solved depending on the type of question and the date posted for some posts may be scheduled to be deleted periodically. Do not hesitate to share your thoughts here to help others.
- Soumil Gupta
- 10 minutes ago
- Physics
- Replies: 0
Soumil Gupta Asks: Reflection of sound wave
My Textbook says that:
Reflection of sound waves for displacement from a rigid boundary (e.g. closed end of an organ pipe) is analogous to reflection of a string wave from rigid boundary; reflection accompanied by an inversion i.e. an abrupt phase change of $pi$. This is consistent with the requirement of displacement amplitude to remain zero at the rigid end, since a medium particle at the rigid end can not vibrate. As the excess pressure and displacement corresponding to the same sound wave vary by $pi/2$ in term of phase, a displacement minima at the rigid end will be a point of pressure maxima. This implies that the reflected pressure wave from the rigid boundary will have same phase as the incident wave, i.e., a compression pulse is reflected as a compression pulse and a rarefaction pulse is reflected as a rarefaction pulse.
I did not understand the last statement. If the phase change after reflection from a rigid boundary is $pi$, then shouldn’t a rarefaction pulse be reflected as a compression pulse and a compression pulse as a rarefaction pulse, afterall the phase difference between a particle at rarefaction and compression is $pi$. Where am I wrong? I think I have trouble understand the $pi$ phase change in the case of sound wave. The same thing was easy to understand in the case of wave on a string. Please clear this confusion!
SolveForum.com may not be responsible for the answers or solutions given to any question asked by the users. All Answers or responses are user generated answers and we do not have proof of its validity or correctness. Please vote for the answer that helped you in order to help others find out which is the most helpful answer. Questions labeled as solved may be solved or may not be solved depending on the type of question and the date posted for some posts may be scheduled to be deleted periodically. Do not hesitate to share your thoughts here to help others.