Autodyn problem terminated energy error too large

Eureka.im is the one of the TOP question answering service that delivers the best answers from the web and real people

AUTODYN automatically calculates the energy balance and gives an error message when the energy error is greater than the tolerance (default is 5%). First, make sure the grid for all parts is correct before running AUTODYN. Then, carefully examine the material properties used in your AUTODYN calculation. Next, check your boundary conditions. If there are Transmit or Flow in/out boundary conditions defined in your AUTODYN model, a certain material can get out of or into the part, taking away or adding in energy. If this is the case, the energy balance check needs to be disabled in the Controls panel by specifying a very large number like 999999 as the energy reference cycle in the Wrapup Criteria options. This effectively disables the AUTODYN energy error check. If an erosion model is used in Lagrange calculations, both kinetic and internal energy gradually decrease as Lagrange elements erode. This also causes an energy balance error. You can either reset the energy reference cycle to the cycle where you got the energy error in the Controls panel, or disable the energy balance check by setting the energy reference cycle to a very big number, such as 999999. Another possible cause of energy error is that a low mesh density is being used for an area with high internal energy such as an explosive. When the mesh is coarse, numerical error in calculating the internal energy is increased. Refining the coarse mesh or increasing the tolerance of the energy error will help to improve this situation. If the AUTODYN model contains ALE parts and the motion constraint is neither Free (Lagrange) nor Equipotential, select the ALE part from the list in the Parts panel and press the Motions button. Then go to ALE Settings and Modify. Change the Iterations per cycle to a number larger than 1. Thus AUTODYN conducts iterations to rezone ALE grids so at the end of all the iterations they are finally placed on equilibrium positions according their motion constraints. This will also help to reduce energy error. Usually you only need to pay attention to the energy balance if there is a spike in the energy history curve. A summary of the energy balance can be viewed through the History panel by selecting either Energy or Material or Part summaries.

Checking model setup…..Please wait

Generating External Faces …… please wait

Initializing…..Please wait

Finished model setup…..

Cycle: 0, Time: 0.000E+00s, Progress: 0.00%, Time Inc.: 8.842E-07s @ element 7888 in Part bmpnframe Est. Cloc

Cycle: 1, Time: 9.727E-07s, Progress: 0.00%, Time Inc.: 9.727E-07s @ element 1162 in Part Seat_r Est. Cloc

Cycle: 2, Time: 2.043E-06s, Progress: 0.00%, Time Inc.: 1.070E-06s @ element 1162 in Part Seat_r Est. Cloc

2.7 hrs

Cycle: 3, Time: 3.220E-06s, Progress: 0.00%, Time Inc.: 1.177E-06s @ element 1162 in Part Seat_r Est. Cloc

3.0 hrs

Cycle: 4, Time: 4.514E-06s, Progress: 0.00%, Time Inc.: 1.295E-06s @ element 1162 in Part Seat_r Est. Cloc

3.1 hrs

Cycle: 5, Time: 5.938E-06s, Progress: 0.00%, Time Inc.: 1.424E-06s @ element 1162 in Part Seat_r Est. Cloc

3.3 hrs

************************************************************

Cycle: 53759, Time: 1.413E-01s, Progress: 56.51%, Time Inc.: 2.622E-06s @ element 1165 in Part Seat_r Est. Cloc

56.1 mins

Cycle: 53760, Time: 1.413E-01s, Progress: 56.51%, Time Inc.: 2.622E-06s @ element 1165 in Part Seat_r Est. Cloc

56.1 mins

Cycle: 53761, Time: 1.413E-01s, Progress: 56.51%, Time Inc.: 2.622E-06s @ element 1165 in Part Seat_r Est. Cloc

56.1 mins

Cycle: 53762, Time: 1.413E-01s, Progress: 56.51%, Time Inc.: 2.622E-06s @ element 1165 in Part Seat_r Est. Cloc

56.1 mins

Cycle: 53763, Time: 1.413E-01s, Progress: 56.51%, Time Inc.: 2.622E-06s @ element 1165 in Part Seat_r Est. Cloc

56.1 mins

Cycle: 53764, Time: 1.413E-01s, Progress: 56.51%, Time Inc.: 2.622E-06s @ element 1165 in Part Seat_r Est. Cloc

56.1 mins

Problem terminated …. energy error too large

Problem terminated …. energy error too large

********************************************

INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Contact US

Thanks. We have received your request and will respond promptly.

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!

  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It’s Free!

*Eng-Tips’s functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

energy error too large ansys autodyn

energy error too large ansys autodyn

(OP)

28 Mar 12 04:41

Hi,
I currently run bullet impact on steel plate.
I modeled it as 2d axissymetry in workbench and run it in autodyn.
After some time of calculation, it showed error that enegyerror too large and problem was terminated.
Could anyone guide me what cause this problem and how to solve it.
Thank in advance
Charoenpon

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Resources

Low-Volume Rapid Injection Molding With 3D Printed Molds

Learn methods and guidelines for using stereolithography (SLA) 3D printed molds in the injection molding process to lower costs and lead time. Discover how this hybrid manufacturing process enables on-demand mold fabrication to quickly produce small batches of thermoplastic parts. Download Now

Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM)

Examine how the principles of DfAM upend many of the long-standing rules around manufacturability — allowing engineers and designers to place a part’s function at the center of their design considerations. Download Now

Industry Perspective: Education and Metal 3D Printing

Metal 3D printing has rapidly emerged as a key technology in modern design and manufacturing, so it’s critical educational institutions include it in their curricula to avoid leaving students at a disadvantage as they enter the workforce. Download Now

Taking Control of Engineering Documents

This ebook covers tips for creating and managing workflows, security best practices and protection of intellectual property, Cloud vs. on-premise software solutions, CAD file management, compliance, and more. Download Now

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet’s largest technical engineering professional community.
It’s easy to join and it’s free.

Here’s Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

  • Eng-Tips ForumsTalk To Other Members
  • Notification Of Responses To Questions
  • Favorite Forums One Click Access
  • Keyword Search Of All Posts, And More…

Register now while it’s still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close

Hi

I try to model explosions above a snowpack (for artificial avalanche release). I use a P-alpha eos and an RHT strength and failure constutive model as used for concrete (adapted Drucker-Prager). However, the density (200 kg/m3), stiffness and strength of snow are extremely low. I use an extremely simple axial symmetric geometry (1 meter in x-direction, some meters in y-direction). Nevertheless I encounter many problems with Autodyn:

1) Even with only the material itself (no atmosphere, no loading, no interaction, no gravity), the model does only work with a high energy reference cycle (9999999, «energy error too large» or «time step too small» otherwise) and then still gives stresses although there shouldn’t be any. The material even expands in plus x-direction although there is no load.

2) Adding gravity in minus x-direction does not improve things. And the unit of the gravity in Autodyn is not even specified.

3) I need an atmosphere for the explosion. However, if I add the explosion, the pressure (e.g. 100 kPa at sea level) leads to immediate failure within the snowpack. Naturally, snow is porous and would be loaded hydrostatically by an atmosphere which would not lead to failure. I tried to add the atmospheric pressure to snow’s strength, but this did not help.

4) If I try to produce a two-layer model (two different snow types), I always get overlapping interfaces. As the geometry is so simple, it is drawn in Autodyn itself.

5) Adding a transmit boundary on the y-end of the model does not help. The material still deforms. The same is valid for a velocity boundary (zero velocity) on the y-end. The velocity is anything else then zero, otherwise the material would not deform on that side and lead to cell degeneration.

6) All different models have one thing in common: Stresses oscillate and there are sharp accelerations, although I haven’t used any explosive yet.

Any ideas of how to solve (some of) these issues?

Kind regards,
Stephan

но транзакция не прошла с ошибкой OUT_OF_ENERGY. То есть TRX списало в качестве комиссии, но не хватило видимо, почему-то Exodus позволил провести такую транзакцию, а не предупредил. И дело в том, что сумма в USDT тоже списалась с баланса и не вернулась, будто заморозилась где-то. На отправленный адрес ничего не поступило. На tronscan.io тоже на балансе отсутствует эта сумма. В Exodus писал, но они что-то морочат голову что ли, совсем о другом речь ведут, по их совету пробовал перезагружать блокчейны в кошельке, но не помогло. Кто сталкивался или знает как можно решить эту проблему?

cryptocurrency

russian

blockchain

trx

Понравилась статья? Поделить с друзьями:
  • Autodesk flexnet license error
  • Autodesk error 500
  • Autodesk error 126
  • Autodesk autocad 2020 не удалось установить код ошибки 1603
  • Autodesk 3ds max license error