Error statement cannot resolve address of overloaded function

abstract declarator ‘TYPE’ used as declaration[edit | edit source]

• Message found in GCC version 4.5.1
  • often grouped together with:
    • member ‘DATA_MEMBER’ with constructor not allowed in anonymous aggregate
    • member ‘DATA_MEMBER’ with destructor not allowed in anonymous aggregate
    • member ‘DATA_MEMBER’ with copy assignment operator not allowed in anonymous aggregate
• a class or struct is missing a name:

struct {  // error, no name
   int bar;
};

• a header file has a class or struct with a name already used inside ifndef, define statements

#ifndef foo
#define foo
#include <vector>

struct foo {  // error, foo already in use
   std::vector<int> bar;
};

#endif

call of overloaded ‘FUNCTION’ is ambiguous[edit | edit source]

‘VARIABLE’ cannot appear in a constant-expression[edit | edit source]

‘VARIABLE’ cannot be used as a function[edit | edit source]

• Message found in GCC version 4.5.1
• make sure the variable name does not have an underscore in it (compiler weirdness)
• you’re using the same name for a variable name and a function inside a function definition

int foo(int baf) { return baf; }
 
int bar(int foo) {
   foo = foo(4);
   return foo; 
}

conversion from ‘TYPE’ to non-scalar type ‘TYPE’ requested[edit | edit source]

• Message found in GCC version 4.5.1
• type conversion error, look for missing «::» syntax or missing parenthesis
• possibly a casting error
• a class member function returns a value that does not match the function’s declared return type

class Foo {
public:
   int x;
};
 
class Bar {
public:
   Foo Maz() { return 0; }  // 0 is of type int, not Foo
};

could not convert ‘STATEMENT’ to ‘bool’[edit | edit source]

• Message found in GCC versions 3.2.3, 4.5.1
• you a mistyped comparison operator (e.g., using: «=» instead of «==»)
• you used an incorrect return type for the called function’s definition

// you had: 
foo operator<(const foo & f) const

// instead of:
bool operator<(const foo & f) const

• you’re using an invalid argument for a conditional statement

string x = "foo";
if (x) cout << "true" << endl;

declaration of ‘FUNCTION’ outside of class is not definition[edit | edit source]

• Message found in GCC versions 3.2.3, 4.5.1
• try using ‘=’ to initialize a value instead of parenthesis
• you used a semicolon or comma between a constructor and an initializer list instead of a colon
• you left a semicolon before the body of a function definition

class Foo 
{
public:
   int bar;
   Foo(int x);
}; 
 
Foo::Foo(int x);  // semicolon ';' needs to be removed
{
   bar = x;
}

declaration of ‘VARIABLE’ shadows a parameter[edit | edit source]

• Message found in GCC versions 3.2.3, 4.5.1
• you’re redefining a variable name that’s already in use, possibly declared in the function’s parameter list

int foo(int bar)
{
   int bar;
   return bar;
}

‘TYPE’ does not name a type[edit | edit source]

• Message found in GCC version 4.5.1
  • in GCC version 3.2.3 sometimes reported as: syntax error before ‘CHARACTER’ token
  • in GCC version 4.0.1, sometimes reported as: ISO C++ forbids declaration
    • e.g.: ISO C++ forbids declaration of ‘vector’ with no type
• you left out an object’s name qualifier or using directive

ostream & os;  // instead of: std::ostream & os;

• make sure you didn’t mistype the scope operator «::», e.g.: «name:name» instead of «name::name»
• make sure you included the required libraries

#include <iostream>
// missing vector library include
class Foo {
public:      
   std::vector<int> Bar(std::vector<int> FooBar) { return FooBar; }
};

• a header file is listed after a file that makes use of it in the include directives

// test.h file
#ifndef TEST_H_
#define TEST_H_
std::string bar;
#endif

// test.cpp file
#include "test.h"
#include <iostream>  // error, needed before test.h
using namespace std;

int main()
{
   cout << bar << endl;
   return 0;
}

expected ‘TOKEN’ before ‘TOKEN’ token[edit | edit source]

• Message found in GCC versions 3.2.3, 4.5.1
  • in GCC version 3.2.3 sometimes reported as: syntax error before ‘CHARACTER’ token
• check for a missing comma or parenthesis in a function’s parameters
• check for a missing semicolon
  • e.g.: expected ‘,’ or ‘;’ before ‘TOKEN’

const int MAX = 10  // error

int main() {
   string foo;
   cout << foo.size();
   return 0;
}

• possibly from a double namespace definition, or a fully-qualified (e.g., std::cout) name already under a ‘using’ directive
• possible missing ‘<<‘ or ‘>>’ operator in a cin/cout statement

int foo = 0, bar = 0;
cin foo >> bar;  // should be: cin >> foo >> bar;

expected primary-expression before ‘TOKEN’[edit | edit source]

expected primary-expression before ‘int’

• Message found in GCC version 4.5.1
  • in GCC version 3.2.3 reported as: parse error before ‘)’ token
• one likely cause is using (or leaving in) a type name in a function call

int sum(int x, int y) { return (x + y); }

int main() {
   int a = 4, b = 5;
   sum(a, int b); // int is the problem causer
   return 0;
}

expected unqualified-id before[edit | edit source]

• Message found in GCC version 4.5.1
• check your syntax for missing, misplaced, or erroneous characters
• expected unqualified-id before ‘(‘ token
  • e.g.: parentheses in a class name

class Foo() {
public:
   int x;
};

• expected unqualified-id before ‘return’
  • e.g.: missing opening brace in a conditional statement

int foo = 3, bar = 2;
if (foo > bar)  // error, no "{"
   cout << foo << endl;
}

incompatible types in assignment of ‘TYPE’ to ‘TYPE’[edit | edit source]

• Message found in GCC versions 4.5.1
• you’re trying to assign to or initialize a character array using a character pointer
  • e.g.: incompatible types in assignment of ‘const char*’ to ‘char [10]’

char bar[10];
const char *foo = "ppp";
bar = *foo;  // error

// possible fix, use strcpy from the cstring header:
char bar[10];
const char *foo = "ppp";
strcpy(bar, foo);

• improperly accessing elements of a 2D array

char foo[2][3];
foo[1] = ' '; // error, need both dimensions, eg: foo[1][0] = ' ';

invalid conversion from ‘TYPE’ to ‘TYPE’[edit | edit source]

• Message found in GCC versions 3.2.3, 4.5.1
• make sure parentheses were not left out of a function name
• make sure you are passing a function the correct arguments

char foo = 'f';
char bar[] = "bar";
if (strcmp(foo, bar) != 0)
   cout << "Correct answer!";
// strcmp was expecting 2 character pointers, foo doesn't qualify

invalid operands of types ‘TYPE’ and ‘TYPE’ to binary ‘FUNCTION’[edit | edit source]

• Message found in GCC version 4.5.1
• You’re trying to concatenate to C string arguments with the addition operator

// attempting to combine two C-strings
cout << "abc" + "def";

// possible fix: convert 1 argument to a string type
cout << "abc" + string("def");

invalid use of template-name[edit | edit source]

invalid use of template-name ‘TEMPLATE’ without an argument list

• Message found in GCC version 4.5.1
  • often paired with: expected unqualified-id before ‘TOKEN’
  • in GCC version 3.2.3 reported as: syntax error before ‘CHARACTER’ token
• the type is missing after the class name in a function definition

template <class T> class Foo {
private:
   int x;
public:
   Foo();
};

template<class T> Foo::Foo() { x = 0; }  // error, should be: Foo<T>::Foo()

is not a member of[edit | edit source]

• Message found in GCC versions 4.5.1
• check for a missing header include

example: ‘cout’ is not a member of ‘std’

// test.cpp
// file is missing iostream include directive
int main() {
   std::cout << "hello, world!n";
   return 0;
}

‘TYPE’ is not a type[edit | edit source]

• Message found in GCC version 4.5.1
  • in GCC version 3.2.3 reported as: type specifier omitted for parameter ‘PARAMETER’
• you mistyped a template parameter in a function declaration

void foo(int x, vector y);

• an included header file does not have the correct libraries included in the source file to implement it:
  • e.g.: you’re using #include «bar.h» without including the «foo.h» that «bar.h» needs to work
• Check that there are no methods with the same name as ‘TYPE’.

‘CLASS_MEMBER’ is private within this context[edit | edit source]

• Message found in GCC versions 3.2.3, 4.5.1
• usually reported in the format:
  • (LOCATION_OF_PRIVATE_DATA_MEMBER) error: ‘DATA_MEMBER’ is private
  • (LOCATION_OF_CODE_ACCESSING_PRIVATE_DATA) error: within this context
• Message usually results from trying to access a private data member of a class or struct outside that class’s or struct’s definition
• Make sure a friend member function name is not misspelled

class FooBar {
private: int bar;
public: friend void foo(FooBar & f);
};
void fooo(FooBar & f) {  // error
   f.bar = 0;
}

• make sure a read only function is using a ‘const’ argument type for the class
• make sure functions that alter data members are not const
• check for derived class constructors implicitly accessing private members of base classes

class Foo {
private: Foo() {}
public: Foo(int Num) {}
};
class Bar : public Foo {
public: Bar() {}
// Bar() implicitly accesses Foo's private constructor
};

solution 1: use an initializer list to bypass implicit initialization

solution 2: make the accessed base class member protected instead of private

• You’re trying to initialize a contained class member by accessing private data

class Foo {
private: char mrStr[5];
public: Foo(const char *s = "blah") { strcpy(mrStr, s); }
};

class Bar {
private:
   int mrNum;
   Foo aFoo;
public:
   Bar(int n, const Foo &f);
};

// error, attempting to use the Foo class constructor by accessing private data:
Bar::Bar(int n, const Foo &f) : aFoo(f.mrStr) {  // mrStr is private
   mrNum = n;
}

possible fix, assign the whole object rather than part of it:

Bar::Bar(int n, const Foo &f) : aFoo(f) {
   mrNum = n;
}

ISO C++ forbids declaration of ‘FUNCTION’ with no type[edit | edit source]

• Message found in GCC version 3.2.3, 4.5.1
• you’ve created a function with no listed return type

Foo() { return 0: }
// should be: int Foo() { return 0: }

multiple definitions of[edit | edit source]

eg: multiple definition of `main’

• Message found in GCC version 4.5.1
• check for missing inclusion guard in header file
• check for duplicate file listing in compile commands / makefile
  • e.g.: g++ -o foo foo.cpp foo.cpp
• check for definitions rather than only declarations in the header file

‘CLASS FUNCTION(ARGUMENTS)’ must have an argument of class or enumerated type[edit | edit source]

• Message found in GCC versions 3.2.3, 4.5.1
• you’re attempting to access members of a class with a non-member function
  • non-member functions must access class members explicitly

eg: CLASS_NAME FUNCTION_NAME(CLASS_NAME OBJECT_NAME, ARGUMENTS)

• you’re redefining an operator for a standard (built-in) type

class Foo {
public:
   friend int operator+(int x, int y);
};

new types may not be defined in a return type[edit | edit source]

• Message found in GCC version 4.5.1
  • in GCC version 3.2.3, reported as:

semicolon missing after definition of ‘CLASS’

ISO C++ forbids defining types within return type

• check for a missing semicolon at the end of a class definition

class Foo {
public:
   int x;
}  // Error

no match for call to ‘FUNCTION’[edit | edit source]

• Message found in GCC versions 3.2.3, 4.5.1
• make sure the function’s namespace is used ( using namespace std / std::function() )
• make sure the function name is not misspelled, parentheses aren’t missing
• make sure the function is called with the correct arguments / types / class
• if you’re initializing a variable via parentheses, if there’s underscores in the variable name try removing them. Sometimes an equals sign is the only way…
• you’re using the same name for a variable and a function within the same namespace

string bar() {
   string foo = "blah";
   return foo;
}

int main() {
   string bar;
   bar = bar();  // error, "bar()" was hidden by string initialization
   return 0;
}

no matching function for call to ‘FUNCTION’[edit | edit source]

• Message found in GCC version 4.5.1
• make sure there aren’t parentheses where there shouldn’t be (e.g.: classname::value() instead of classname::value )
• you’re using a string argument with a function that expects a C-string

// broken code
ifstream in;
string MrString = "file.txt";
in.open(MrString);

// solution: convert the string to a C-string
ifstream in;
string MrString = "file.txt";
in.open(MrString.c_str());

non-constant ‘VARIABLE’ cannot be used as template argument[edit | edit source]

• Message found in GCC version 3.2.3
  • in GCC version 4.5.1 reported as: ‘VARIABLE’ cannot appear in a constant-expression
• variable used for a template argument, which are required to be constant at compile time

template <class T, int num>
class Bar {
private:
   T Foo[num];
};

int main() {
   int woz = 8;
   Bar<double, woz> Zed;  // error, woz is not a constant
   return 0;
}

non-member function ‘FUNCTION’ cannot have cv-qualifier[edit | edit source]

error: non-member function ‘int Foo()’ cannot have cv-qualifier

cv = constant / volatile

• Message found in GCC version 4.5.1
• you’re using the ‘post’ const (constant value) on a non-member function
• you’re not using the scope qualifier («TYPENAME::») in the function definition
• you mistyped the definition for a template class’s member function

template<class Type>
class Foo {
private:
   int stuff;
public:
   int bar() const;
};

template<class Type>
int Foo::bar() const {  // error
   return stuff;
}

possible fix:

template<class Type>
int Foo<Type>::bar() const {
   return stuff;
}

passing ‘const OBJECT’ as ‘this’ argument of ‘FUNCTION’ discards qualifiers[edit | edit source]

• Message found in GCC version 4.5.1
• you’re returning an address
• you’re attempting to access a container element with a const_iterator using a member function that has no non-const versions. The non-const function does not guarantee it will not alter the data

request for member ‘NAME’ in ‘NAME’, which is of non-class type ‘CLASS’[edit | edit source]

• Message found in GCC versions 4.5.1
  • in GCC version 3.2.3 reported as:

request for member ‘NAME’ in ‘NAME’, which is of non-aggregate type ‘TYPE’

• check the function call in the code, it might be calling a function with incorrect arguments or it might have misplaced/missing parenthesis
• your using the «*this» pointer where you should just be using the functions name
• e.g., use: return mem_func(); instead of: return *this.mem_func();
• using the «*this» pointer with the wrong syntax

class Foo {
public:
   int x;
   Foo(int num = 0) { x = num; }
   void newX(int num);
};

void Foo::newX(int num) {
   *this.newX(num);  // error, need (*this).newX or this->newX
}

statement cannot resolve address of overloaded function[edit | edit source]

• Message found in GCC versions 3.2.3, 4.5.1
• make sure you’re not forgetting the parenthesis after a member function name

class Foo {
public:
   int Bar() { return 0; }
};

int main() {
   Foo x;
   x.Bar;  // error
   return 0;
}

two or more data types in declaration of ‘NAME’[edit | edit source]

• Message found in GCC version 4.5.1
  • in GCC version 3.2.3 reported as: extraneous ‘TYPE’ ignored
• you have multiple data types listed for a function declaration’s return value

int char sum(int x, int y);  // int char

• possibly a missing semicolon in between 2 type declarations
  • usually missing in a function, struct, or class declaration after the curly braces {}

<GOBBLEDEGOOK> undefined reference to <GOBBLEDEGOOK>[edit | edit source]

• Message found in GCC version 4.5.1
  • in GCC versions 4.0.1, 4.2.1 reported as: Undefined symbols
• check for a missing or mistyped header includes
• check for a missing or mistyped files/libraries in a project/make file
• check for a missing, mistyped, or undefined functions or class constructors

// header file
void foo();
void bar();
void baz();

// implementation file, bar definition is missing
void foo() { cout << "foon"; }
void baz() { cout << "bazn"; }

• check for function declarations that do not match their definitions
• make sure function names do not overlap those in existing header files
• make sure compile commands syntax / makefile structure is correct (e.g.: g++ -o file.cc … etc.)
• no main() function is defined in any of the files inside a project/makefile
  • e.g.: undefined reference to `WinMain@16′

‘NAME’ was not declared in this scope[edit | edit source]

• Message found in GCC version 4.5.1
  • in GCC versions 3.2.3 reported as: ‘FUNCTION’ undeclared (first use of this function)
• look for a misspelled or changed variable/function/header call name

lonh wait;

// instead of:
long wait;

• make sure the proper header and library files are included
  • defined variables may need the headers they utilize included in all files that use the defined variables