Просмотров 1.8к. Опубликовано 19.12.2022
Обновлено 19.12.2022
Каждый сайт, который создает компания, должен отвечать принятым стандартам. В первую очередь затем, чтобы он попадал в поисковую выдачу и был удобен для пользователей. Если код страниц содержит ошибки, неточности, он становится “невалидным”, то есть не соответствующим требованиям. В результате интернет-ресурс не увидят пользователи или информация на нем будет отображаться некорректно.
В этой статье рассмотрим, что такое валидность, какие могут быть ошибки в HTML-разметке и как их устранить.
Содержание
- Что такое HTML-ошибка валидации и зачем она нужна
- Чем опасны ошибки в разметке
- Как проверить ошибки валидации
- Предупреждения
- Ошибки
- Пример прохождения валидации для страницы сайта
- Как исправить ошибку валидации
- Плагины для браузеров, которые помогут найти ошибки в коде
- Коротко о главном
Что такое HTML-ошибка валидации и зачем она нужна
Под понятием “валидация” подразумевается процесс онлайн-проверки HTML-кода страницы на соответствие стандартам w3c. Эти стандарты были разработаны Организацией всемирной паутины и стандартов качества разметки. Сама организация продвигает идею унификации сайтов по HTML-коду — чтобы каждому пользователю, вне зависимости от браузера или устройства, было удобно использовать ресурс.
Если код отвечает стандартам, то его называют валидным. Браузеры могут его прочитать, загрузить страницы, а поисковые системы легко находят страницу по соответствующему запросу.
Чем опасны ошибки в разметке
Ошибки валидации могут разными — видимыми для глаза простого пользователя или такими, которые можно засечь только с помощью специальных программ. В первом случае кроме технических проблем, ошибки в разметке приводят к негативному пользовательскому опыту.
К наиболее распространённым последствиям ошибок в коде HTML-разметки также относят сбои в нормальной работе сайта и помехи в продвижении ресурса в поисковых системах.
Рассмотрим несколько примеров, как ошибки могут проявляться при работе:
- Медленно подгружается страница
Согласно исследованию Unbounce, более четверти пользователей покидают страницу, если её загрузка занимает более 3 секунд, ещё треть уходит после 6 секунд;
- Не видна часть текстовых, фото и видео-блоков
Эта проблема делает контент для пользователей неинформативным, поэтому они в большинстве случаев уходят со страницы, не досмотрев её до конца;
- Страница может остаться не проиндексированной
Если поисковый робот распознает недочёт в разметке, он может пропустить страницу и прервать её размещение в поисковых системах;
- Разное отображение страниц на разных устройствах
Например, на компьютере или ноутбуке страница будет выглядеть хорошо, а на мобильных гаджетах половина кнопок и изображений будет попросту не видна.
Из-за этих ошибок пользователь не сможет нормально работать с ресурсом. Единственное решение для него — закрыть вкладку и найти нужную информацию на другом сайте. Так количество посетителей сайта постепенно уменьшается, он перестает попадать в поисковую выдачу — в результате ресурс становится бесполезным и пропадает в пучине Интернета.
Как проверить ошибки валидации
Владельцы ресурсов используют 2 способа онлайн-проверки сайтов на наличие ошибок — технический аудит или использование валидаторов.
Первый случай подходит для серьёзных проблем и масштабных сайтов. Валидаторами же пользуются ежедневно. Наиболее популярный — сервис The W3C Markup Validation Service. Он сканирует сайт и сравнивает код на соответствие стандартам W3C. Валидатор выдаёт 2 типа несоответствий разметки стандартам W3C: предупреждения и ошибки.
Давайте рассмотрим каждый из типов чуть подробнее.
Предупреждения
Предупреждения отмечают незначительные проблемы, которые не влияют на работу ресурса. Они появляются из-за расхождений написания разметки со стандартами W3C.
Тем не менее, предупреждения всё равно нужно устранять, так как из-за них сайт может работать медленнее — например, по сравнению с конкурентами с такими же сайтами.
Примером предупреждения может быть указание на отсутствие тега alt у изображения.
Ошибки
Ошибки — это те проблемы, которые требуют обязательного устранения.
Они представляют угрозу для корректной работы сайта: например, из-за них могут скрываться разные блоки — текстовые, фото, видео. А в некоторых более запущенных случаях содержимое страницы может вовсе не отображаться, и сам ресурс не будет загружаться. Поэтому после проверки уделять внимание ошибкам с красными отметками нужно в первую очередь.
Распространённым примером ошибки может быть отсутствие тега <!DOCTYPE html> в начале страницы, который помогает информации преобразоваться в разметку.
Пример прохождения валидации для страницы сайта
Рассмотрим процесс валидации на примере сайта avavax.ru, который создали на WordPress.
В результате проверки валидатор выдал 17 замечаний. После анализа отчета их можно свести к 3 основным:
- атрибут ‘text/javascript’ не требуется при подключении скрипта;
- атрибут ‘text/css’ не требуется при подключении стиля;
- у одного из элементов section нет внутри заголовка h1-h6.
Первое и второе замечания генерирует сам движок WordPress, поэтому разработчикам не нужно их убирать. Третье же замечание предполагает, что каждый блок текста должен иметь заголовок, даже если это не всегда необходимо или видно для читателя.
Решить проблемы с предупреждениями для стилей и скриптов можно через добавление кода в файл темы function.php.
Для этого на хук wp_loaded нужно повесить функцию output_buffer_start(), которая загрузит весь генерируемый код html в буфер. При выводе в буфер вызывается функция output_callback($tag), которая просматривает все теги, находит нежелательные атрибуты с помощью регулярных выражений и заменяет их пробелами. Затем на хук ‘shutdown вешается функция output_buffer_end(), которая возвращает обработанное содержимое буфера.
Для исправления семантики на сайте нужно использовать заголовки. Валидатор выдаёт предупреждение на секцию about, которая содержит фото и краткий текст. Валидатор требует, чтобы в каждой секции был заголовок. Для исправления предупреждения нужно добавить заголовок, но сделать это так, чтобы его не было видно пользователям:
- Добавить заголовок в код: <h3>Обо мне</h3>
Отключить отображение заголовка:
1 #about h3 {
2 display: none;
3 }
После этой части заголовок будет в коде, но валидатор его увидит, а посетитель — нет.
За 3 действия удалось убрать все предупреждения, чтобы качество кода устроило валидатор. Это подтверждается зелёной строкой с надписью: “Document checking completed. No errors or warnings to show”.
Как исправить ошибку валидации
Всё зависит от того, какими техническими знаниями обладает владелец ресурса. Он может сделать это сам, вручную. Делать это нужно постепенно, разбирая ошибку за ошибкой. Но нужно понимать, что если при проверке валидатором было выявлено 100 проблем — все 100 нужно обязательно решить.
Поэтому если навыков и знаний не хватает, лучше привлечь сторонних специалистов для улучшения качества разметки. Это могут быть как фрилансеры, так и профессиональные веб-агентства. При выборе хорошего специалиста, результат будет гарантироваться в любом случае, но лучше, чтобы в договоре оказания услуг будут чётко прописаны цели проведения аудита и гарантии решения проблем с сайтом.
Если объём работ большой, выгоднее заказать профессиональный аудит сайта. С его помощью можно обнаружить разные виды ошибок, улучшить внешний вид и привлекательность интернет-ресурса для поисковых ботов, обычных пользователей, а также повысить скорость загрузки страниц, сделать качественную верстку и избавиться от переспама.
Плагины для браузеров, которые помогут найти ошибки в коде
Для поиска ошибок валидации можно использовать и встроенные в браузеры плагины. Они помогут быстро находить неточности еще на этапе создания кода.
Для каждого браузера есть свой адаптивный плагин:
- HTML Validator для браузера Firefox;
- HTML Validator for Chrome;
- HTML5 Editor для Opera.
С помощью этих инструментов можно не допускать проблем, которые помешают нормальному запуску сайта. Плагины помогут оценить качество внешней и внутренней оптимизации, контента и другие характеристики.
Коротко о главном
Валидация — процесс выявления проблем с HTML-разметкой сайта и ее соответствия стандартам W3C. Это унифицированные правила, с помощью которых сайт может нормально работать и отображаться и для поисковых роботов, и для пользователей.
Проверку ресурса можно проводить тремя путями: валидаторами, специалистам полномасштабного аудита и плагинами в браузере. В большинстве случаев валидатор — самое удобное и быстрое решение для поиска проблем. С его помощью можно выявить 2 типа проблем с разметкой — предупреждения и ошибки.
Работать необходимо сразу с двумя типами ошибок. Даже если предупреждение не приведет к неисправности сайта, оставлять без внимания проблемные блоки нельзя, так как это снизит привлекательность ресурса в глазах пользователя. Ошибки же могут привести к невозможности отображения блоков на сайте, понижению сайта в поисковой выдаче или полному игнорированию ресурса со стороны поискового бота.
Даже у крупных сайтов с миллионной аудиторией, например, Яндекс.Дзен или ВКонтакте, есть проблемы с кодом. Но комплексный подход к решению проблем помогает устранять серьёзные моменты своевременно. Нужно развивать сайт всесторонне, чтобы получить результат от его существования и поддержки. Если самостоятельно разобраться с проблемами не получается, не стоит “доламывать” — лучше обратиться за помощью к профессионалам, например, агентствам по веб-аудиту.
Наличие ошибок в коде страницы сайта всегда влечет за собой негативные последствия – от ухудшения позиций в ранжировании до жалоб со стороны пользователей. Ошибки валидации могут наблюдаться как на главной, так и на иных веб-страницах, их наличие свидетельствует о том, что ресурс является невалидным. Некоторые проблемы замечают даже неподготовленные пользователи, другие невозможно обнаружить без предварительного аудита, анализа. О том, что такое ошибки валидации и как их обнаружить, мы сейчас расскажем.
Ошибка валидации, что это такое?
Для написания страниц используется HTML – стандартизированный язык разметки, применяемый в веб-разработке. HTML, как любой другой язык, имеет специфические особенности синтаксиса, грамматики и т. д. Если во время написания кода правила не учитываются, то после запуска сайта будут появляться различные виды проблем. Если HTML-код ресурса не соответствует стандарту W3C, то он является невалидным, о чем мы писали выше.
Почему ошибки валидации сайта оказывают влияние на ранжирование, восприятие?
Наличие погрешностей в коде – проблема, с которой необходимо бороться сразу после обнаружения. Поисковые системы «читают» HTML-код, если он некорректный, то процесс индексации и ранжирования может быть затруднен. Поисковые роботы должны понимать, каким является ресурс, что он предлагает, какие запросы использует. Особо критичны такие ситуации для ресурсов, имеющих большое количество веб-страниц.
Как проверить ошибки валидации?
Для этой работы используется либо технический аудит сайта, либо валидаторы, которые ищут проблемы автоматически. Одним из самых популярных является сервис The W3C Markup Validation Service, выполняющий сканирование с оглядкой на World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). Рассматриваемый валидатор предлагает три способа, с помощью которых можно осуществить проверку сайта:
- ввод URL-адреса страниц, которые необходимо просканировать;
- загрузка файла страницы;
- ввод части HTML-кода, нуждающегося в проверке.
После завершения проверки вы получите развернутый список выявленных проблем, дополненных описанием, ссылками на стандарты W3C. По ходу анализа вы увидите слабые места со ссылками на правила, что позволит самостоятельно исправить проблему.
Существуют другие сервисы, позволяющие выполнить проверку валидности кода:
- Dr. Watson. Проверяет скорость загрузки страниц, орфографию, ссылки, а также исходный код;
- InternetSupervision.com. Отслеживает производительность сайта, проверяет доступность HTML.
Плагины для браузеров, которые помогут найти ошибки в коде
Решить рассматриваемую задачу можно с помощью плагинов, адаптированных под конкретный браузер. Можно использовать следующие инструменты (бесплатные):
- HTML Validator для браузера Firefox;
- HTML Validator for Chrome;
- Validate HTML для Firefox.
После проверки нужно решить, будете ли вы устранять выявленные ошибки. Многие эксперты акцентируют внимание на том, что поисковые системы сегодня уделяют больше внимания качеству внешней/внутренней оптимизации, контенту, другим характеристикам. Однако валидность нельзя оставлять без внимания, ведь если даже обнаруженные проблемы не будут мешать поисковым ботам, то они точно начнут раздражать посетителей сайта.
Как исправить ошибку валидации?
В первую очередь нужно сосредоточить внимание на слабых местах, связанных с контентом – это то, что важно для поисковых систем. Если во время сканирования было выявлено более 25 проблем, то их нельзя игнорировать из-за ряда причин:
- частичная индексация;
- медленная загрузка;
- баги, возникающие во время непосредственной коммуникации пользователя с ресурсом.
Например, игнорирование ошибок может привести к тому, что некоторые страницы не будут проиндексированы. Для решения рассматриваемой проблемы можно привлечь опытного фрилансера, однако лучшее решение – заказ услуги в веб-агентстве, что позволит исправить, а не усугубить ситуацию.
Технический и SEO-аудит
Выявление ошибок – первый шаг, ведь их еще нужно будет устранить. При наличии большого пула проблем целесообразно заказать профессиональный аудит сайта. Он поможет найти разные виды ошибок, повысит привлекательность ресурса для поисковых ботов, обычных пользователей: скорость загрузки страниц, верстка, переспам, другое.
В заключение
На всех сайтах наблюдаются ошибки валидации – их невозможно искоренить полностью, но и оставлять без внимания не стоит. Например, если провести проверку сайтов Google или «Яндекс», то можно увидеть ошибки, однако это не означает, что стоит вздохнуть спокойно и закрыть глаза на происходящее. Владелец сайта должен ставить во главу угла комплексное развитие, при таком подходе ресурс будет наполняться, обновляться и «лечиться» своевременно. Если проблем мало, то можно попробовать устранить их своими силами или с помощью привлечения стороннего частного специалиста. В остальных случаях лучше заказать услугу у проверенного подрядчика.
Validation
- Introduction
- Validation Quickstart
- Defining The Routes
- Creating The Controller
- Writing The Validation Logic
- Displaying The Validation Errors
- Repopulating Forms
- A Note On Optional Fields
- Validation Error Response Format
- Form Request Validation
- Creating Form Requests
- Authorizing Form Requests
- Customizing The Error Messages
- Preparing Input For Validation
- Manually Creating Validators
- Automatic Redirection
- Named Error Bags
- Customizing The Error Messages
- After Validation Hook
- Working With Validated Input
- Working With Error Messages
- Specifying Custom Messages In Language Files
- Specifying Attributes In Language Files
- Specifying Values In Language Files
- Available Validation Rules
- Conditionally Adding Rules
- Validating Arrays
- Validating Nested Array Input
- Error Message Indexes & Positions
- Validating Files
- Validating Passwords
- Custom Validation Rules
- Using Rule Objects
- Using Closures
- Implicit Rules
Introduction
Laravel provides several different approaches to validate your application’s incoming data. It is most common to use the validate
method available on all incoming HTTP requests. However, we will discuss other approaches to validation as well.
Laravel includes a wide variety of convenient validation rules that you may apply to data, even providing the ability to validate if values are unique in a given database table. We’ll cover each of these validation rules in detail so that you are familiar with all of Laravel’s validation features.
Validation Quickstart
To learn about Laravel’s powerful validation features, let’s look at a complete example of validating a form and displaying the error messages back to the user. By reading this high-level overview, you’ll be able to gain a good general understanding of how to validate incoming request data using Laravel:
Defining The Routes
First, let’s assume we have the following routes defined in our routes/web.php
file:
use AppHttpControllersPostController;
Route::get('/post/create', [PostController::class, 'create']);
Route::post('/post', [PostController::class, 'store']);
The GET
route will display a form for the user to create a new blog post, while the POST
route will store the new blog post in the database.
Creating The Controller
Next, let’s take a look at a simple controller that handles incoming requests to these routes. We’ll leave the store
method empty for now:
<?php
namespace AppHttpControllers;
use AppHttpControllersController;
use IlluminateHttpRequest;
class PostController extends Controller
{
/**
* Show the form to create a new blog post.
*
* @return IlluminateViewView
*/
public function create()
{
return view('post.create');
}
/**
* Store a new blog post.
*
* @param IlluminateHttpRequest $request
* @return IlluminateHttpResponse
*/
public function store(Request $request)
{
// Validate and store the blog post...
}
}
Writing The Validation Logic
Now we are ready to fill in our store
method with the logic to validate the new blog post. To do this, we will use the validate
method provided by the IlluminateHttpRequest
object. If the validation rules pass, your code will keep executing normally; however, if validation fails, an IlluminateValidationValidationException
exception will be thrown and the proper error response will automatically be sent back to the user.
If validation fails during a traditional HTTP request, a redirect response to the previous URL will be generated. If the incoming request is an XHR request, a JSON response containing the validation error messages will be returned.
To get a better understanding of the validate
method, let’s jump back into the store
method:
/**
* Store a new blog post.
*
* @param IlluminateHttpRequest $request
* @return IlluminateHttpResponse
*/
public function store(Request $request)
{
$validated = $request->validate([
'title' => 'required|unique:posts|max:255',
'body' => 'required',
]);
// The blog post is valid...
}
As you can see, the validation rules are passed into the validate
method. Don’t worry — all available validation rules are documented. Again, if the validation fails, the proper response will automatically be generated. If the validation passes, our controller will continue executing normally.
Alternatively, validation rules may be specified as arrays of rules instead of a single |
delimited string:
$validatedData = $request->validate([
'title' => ['required', 'unique:posts', 'max:255'],
'body' => ['required'],
]);
In addition, you may use the validateWithBag
method to validate a request and store any error messages within a named error bag:
$validatedData = $request->validateWithBag('post', [
'title' => ['required', 'unique:posts', 'max:255'],
'body' => ['required'],
]);
Stopping On First Validation Failure
Sometimes you may wish to stop running validation rules on an attribute after the first validation failure. To do so, assign the bail
rule to the attribute:
$request->validate([
'title' => 'bail|required|unique:posts|max:255',
'body' => 'required',
]);
In this example, if the unique
rule on the title
attribute fails, the max
rule will not be checked. Rules will be validated in the order they are assigned.
A Note On Nested Attributes
If the incoming HTTP request contains «nested» field data, you may specify these fields in your validation rules using «dot» syntax:
$request->validate([
'title' => 'required|unique:posts|max:255',
'author.name' => 'required',
'author.description' => 'required',
]);
On the other hand, if your field name contains a literal period, you can explicitly prevent this from being interpreted as «dot» syntax by escaping the period with a backslash:
$request->validate([
'title' => 'required|unique:posts|max:255',
'v1.0' => 'required',
]);
Displaying The Validation Errors
So, what if the incoming request fields do not pass the given validation rules? As mentioned previously, Laravel will automatically redirect the user back to their previous location. In addition, all of the validation errors and request input will automatically be flashed to the session.
An $errors
variable is shared with all of your application’s views by the IlluminateViewMiddlewareShareErrorsFromSession
middleware, which is provided by the web
middleware group. When this middleware is applied an $errors
variable will always be available in your views, allowing you to conveniently assume the $errors
variable is always defined and can be safely used. The $errors
variable will be an instance of IlluminateSupportMessageBag
. For more information on working with this object, check out its documentation.
So, in our example, the user will be redirected to our controller’s create
method when validation fails, allowing us to display the error messages in the view:
<!-- /resources/views/post/create.blade.php --> <h1>Create Post</h1> @if ($errors->any()) <div class="alert alert-danger"> <ul> @foreach ($errors->all() as $error) <li>{{ $error }}</li> @endforeach </ul> </div> @endif <!-- Create Post Form -->
Customizing The Error Messages
Laravel’s built-in validation rules each have an error message that is located in your application’s lang/en/validation.php
file. Within this file, you will find a translation entry for each validation rule. You are free to change or modify these messages based on the needs of your application.
In addition, you may copy this file to another translation language directory to translate the messages for your application’s language. To learn more about Laravel localization, check out the complete localization documentation.
XHR Requests & Validation
In this example, we used a traditional form to send data to the application. However, many applications receive XHR requests from a JavaScript powered frontend. When using the validate
method during an XHR request, Laravel will not generate a redirect response. Instead, Laravel generates a JSON response containing all of the validation errors. This JSON response will be sent with a 422 HTTP status code.
The @error
Directive
You may use the @error
Blade directive to quickly determine if validation error messages exist for a given attribute. Within an @error
directive, you may echo the $message
variable to display the error message:
<!-- /resources/views/post/create.blade.php --> <label for="title">Post Title</label> <input id="title" type="text" name="title" class="@error('title') is-invalid @enderror"> @error('title') <div class="alert alert-danger">{{ $message }}</div> @enderror
If you are using named error bags, you may pass the name of the error bag as the second argument to the @error
directive:
<input ... class="@error('title', 'post') is-invalid @enderror">
Repopulating Forms
When Laravel generates a redirect response due to a validation error, the framework will automatically flash all of the request’s input to the session. This is done so that you may conveniently access the input during the next request and repopulate the form that the user attempted to submit.
To retrieve flashed input from the previous request, invoke the old
method on an instance of IlluminateHttpRequest
. The old
method will pull the previously flashed input data from the session:
$title = $request->old('title');
Laravel also provides a global old
helper. If you are displaying old input within a Blade template, it is more convenient to use the old
helper to repopulate the form. If no old input exists for the given field, null
will be returned:
<input type="text" name="title" value="{{ old('title') }}">
A Note On Optional Fields
By default, Laravel includes the TrimStrings
and ConvertEmptyStringsToNull
middleware in your application’s global middleware stack. These middleware are listed in the stack by the AppHttpKernel
class. Because of this, you will often need to mark your «optional» request fields as nullable
if you do not want the validator to consider null
values as invalid. For example:
$request->validate([
'title' => 'required|unique:posts|max:255',
'body' => 'required',
'publish_at' => 'nullable|date',
]);
In this example, we are specifying that the publish_at
field may be either null
or a valid date representation. If the nullable
modifier is not added to the rule definition, the validator would consider null
an invalid date.
Validation Error Response Format
When your application throws a IlluminateValidationValidationException
exception and the incoming HTTP request is expecting a JSON response, Laravel will automatically format the error messages for you and return a 422 Unprocessable Entity
HTTP response.
Below, you can review an example of the JSON response format for validation errors. Note that nested error keys are flattened into «dot» notation format:
{ "message": "The team name must be a string. (and 4 more errors)", "errors": { "team_name": [ "The team name must be a string.", "The team name must be at least 1 characters." ], "authorization.role": [ "The selected authorization.role is invalid." ], "users.0.email": [ "The users.0.email field is required." ], "users.2.email": [ "The users.2.email must be a valid email address." ] } }
Form Request Validation
Creating Form Requests
For more complex validation scenarios, you may wish to create a «form request». Form requests are custom request classes that encapsulate their own validation and authorization logic. To create a form request class, you may use the make:request
Artisan CLI command:
php artisan make:request StorePostRequest
The generated form request class will be placed in the app/Http/Requests
directory. If this directory does not exist, it will be created when you run the make:request
command. Each form request generated by Laravel has two methods: authorize
and rules
.
As you might have guessed, the authorize
method is responsible for determining if the currently authenticated user can perform the action represented by the request, while the rules
method returns the validation rules that should apply to the request’s data:
/**
* Get the validation rules that apply to the request.
*
* @return array
*/
public function rules()
{
return [
'title' => 'required|unique:posts|max:255',
'body' => 'required',
];
}
Note
You may type-hint any dependencies you require within therules
method’s signature. They will automatically be resolved via the Laravel service container.
So, how are the validation rules evaluated? All you need to do is type-hint the request on your controller method. The incoming form request is validated before the controller method is called, meaning you do not need to clutter your controller with any validation logic:
/**
* Store a new blog post.
*
* @param AppHttpRequestsStorePostRequest $request
* @return IlluminateHttpResponse
*/
public function store(StorePostRequest $request)
{
// The incoming request is valid...
// Retrieve the validated input data...
$validated = $request->validated();
// Retrieve a portion of the validated input data...
$validated = $request->safe()->only(['name', 'email']);
$validated = $request->safe()->except(['name', 'email']);
}
If validation fails, a redirect response will be generated to send the user back to their previous location. The errors will also be flashed to the session so they are available for display. If the request was an XHR request, an HTTP response with a 422 status code will be returned to the user including a JSON representation of the validation errors.
Adding After Hooks To Form Requests
If you would like to add an «after» validation hook to a form request, you may use the withValidator
method. This method receives the fully constructed validator, allowing you to call any of its methods before the validation rules are actually evaluated:
/**
* Configure the validator instance.
*
* @param IlluminateValidationValidator $validator
* @return void
*/
public function withValidator($validator)
{
$validator->after(function ($validator) {
if ($this->somethingElseIsInvalid()) {
$validator->errors()->add('field', 'Something is wrong with this field!');
}
});
}
Stopping On First Validation Failure Attribute
By adding a stopOnFirstFailure
property to your request class, you may inform the validator that it should stop validating all attributes once a single validation failure has occurred:
/**
* Indicates if the validator should stop on the first rule failure.
*
* @var bool
*/
protected $stopOnFirstFailure = true;
Customizing The Redirect Location
As previously discussed, a redirect response will be generated to send the user back to their previous location when form request validation fails. However, you are free to customize this behavior. To do so, define a $redirect
property on your form request:
/**
* The URI that users should be redirected to if validation fails.
*
* @var string
*/
protected $redirect = '/dashboard';
Or, if you would like to redirect users to a named route, you may define a $redirectRoute
property instead:
/**
* The route that users should be redirected to if validation fails.
*
* @var string
*/
protected $redirectRoute = 'dashboard';
Authorizing Form Requests
The form request class also contains an authorize
method. Within this method, you may determine if the authenticated user actually has the authority to update a given resource. For example, you may determine if a user actually owns a blog comment they are attempting to update. Most likely, you will interact with your authorization gates and policies within this method:
use AppModelsComment;
/**
* Determine if the user is authorized to make this request.
*
* @return bool
*/
public function authorize()
{
$comment = Comment::find($this->route('comment'));
return $comment && $this->user()->can('update', $comment);
}
Since all form requests extend the base Laravel request class, we may use the user
method to access the currently authenticated user. Also, note the call to the route
method in the example above. This method grants you access to the URI parameters defined on the route being called, such as the {comment}
parameter in the example below:
Route::post('/comment/{comment}');
Therefore, if your application is taking advantage of route model binding, your code may be made even more succinct by accessing the resolved model as a property of the request:
return $this->user()->can('update', $this->comment);
If the authorize
method returns false
, an HTTP response with a 403 status code will automatically be returned and your controller method will not execute.
If you plan to handle authorization logic for the request in another part of your application, you may simply return true
from the authorize
method:
/**
* Determine if the user is authorized to make this request.
*
* @return bool
*/
public function authorize()
{
return true;
}
Note
You may type-hint any dependencies you need within theauthorize
method’s signature. They will automatically be resolved via the Laravel service container.
Customizing The Error Messages
You may customize the error messages used by the form request by overriding the messages
method. This method should return an array of attribute / rule pairs and their corresponding error messages:
/**
* Get the error messages for the defined validation rules.
*
* @return array
*/
public function messages()
{
return [
'title.required' => 'A title is required',
'body.required' => 'A message is required',
];
}
Customizing The Validation Attributes
Many of Laravel’s built-in validation rule error messages contain an :attribute
placeholder. If you would like the :attribute
placeholder of your validation message to be replaced with a custom attribute name, you may specify the custom names by overriding the attributes
method. This method should return an array of attribute / name pairs:
/**
* Get custom attributes for validator errors.
*
* @return array
*/
public function attributes()
{
return [
'email' => 'email address',
];
}
Preparing Input For Validation
If you need to prepare or sanitize any data from the request before you apply your validation rules, you may use the prepareForValidation
method:
use IlluminateSupportStr;
/**
* Prepare the data for validation.
*
* @return void
*/
protected function prepareForValidation()
{
$this->merge([
'slug' => Str::slug($this->slug),
]);
}
Likewise, if you need to normalize any request data after validation is complete, you may use the passedValidation
method:
use IlluminateSupportStr;
/**
* Handle a passed validation attempt.
*
* @return void
*/
protected function passedValidation()
{
$this->replace(['name' => 'Taylor']);
}
Manually Creating Validators
If you do not want to use the validate
method on the request, you may create a validator instance manually using the Validator
facade. The make
method on the facade generates a new validator instance:
<?php
namespace AppHttpControllers;
use AppHttpControllersController;
use IlluminateHttpRequest;
use IlluminateSupportFacadesValidator;
class PostController extends Controller
{
/**
* Store a new blog post.
*
* @param Request $request
* @return Response
*/
public function store(Request $request)
{
$validator = Validator::make($request->all(), [
'title' => 'required|unique:posts|max:255',
'body' => 'required',
]);
if ($validator->fails()) {
return redirect('post/create')
->withErrors($validator)
->withInput();
}
// Retrieve the validated input...
$validated = $validator->validated();
// Retrieve a portion of the validated input...
$validated = $validator->safe()->only(['name', 'email']);
$validated = $validator->safe()->except(['name', 'email']);
// Store the blog post...
}
}
The first argument passed to the make
method is the data under validation. The second argument is an array of the validation rules that should be applied to the data.
After determining whether the request validation failed, you may use the withErrors
method to flash the error messages to the session. When using this method, the $errors
variable will automatically be shared with your views after redirection, allowing you to easily display them back to the user. The withErrors
method accepts a validator, a MessageBag
, or a PHP array
.
Stopping On First Validation Failure
The stopOnFirstFailure
method will inform the validator that it should stop validating all attributes once a single validation failure has occurred:
if ($validator->stopOnFirstFailure()->fails()) {
// ...
}
Automatic Redirection
If you would like to create a validator instance manually but still take advantage of the automatic redirection offered by the HTTP request’s validate
method, you may call the validate
method on an existing validator instance. If validation fails, the user will automatically be redirected or, in the case of an XHR request, a JSON response will be returned:
Validator::make($request->all(), [
'title' => 'required|unique:posts|max:255',
'body' => 'required',
])->validate();
You may use the validateWithBag
method to store the error messages in a named error bag if validation fails:
Validator::make($request->all(), [
'title' => 'required|unique:posts|max:255',
'body' => 'required',
])->validateWithBag('post');
Named Error Bags
If you have multiple forms on a single page, you may wish to name the MessageBag
containing the validation errors, allowing you to retrieve the error messages for a specific form. To achieve this, pass a name as the second argument to withErrors
:
return redirect('register')->withErrors($validator, 'login');
You may then access the named MessageBag
instance from the $errors
variable:
{{ $errors->login->first('email') }}
Customizing The Error Messages
If needed, you may provide custom error messages that a validator instance should use instead of the default error messages provided by Laravel. There are several ways to specify custom messages. First, you may pass the custom messages as the third argument to the Validator::make
method:
$validator = Validator::make($input, $rules, $messages = [
'required' => 'The :attribute field is required.',
]);
In this example, the :attribute
placeholder will be replaced by the actual name of the field under validation. You may also utilize other placeholders in validation messages. For example:
$messages = [
'same' => 'The :attribute and :other must match.',
'size' => 'The :attribute must be exactly :size.',
'between' => 'The :attribute value :input is not between :min - :max.',
'in' => 'The :attribute must be one of the following types: :values',
];
Specifying A Custom Message For A Given Attribute
Sometimes you may wish to specify a custom error message only for a specific attribute. You may do so using «dot» notation. Specify the attribute’s name first, followed by the rule:
$messages = [
'email.required' => 'We need to know your email address!',
];
Specifying Custom Attribute Values
Many of Laravel’s built-in error messages include an :attribute
placeholder that is replaced with the name of the field or attribute under validation. To customize the values used to replace these placeholders for specific fields, you may pass an array of custom attributes as the fourth argument to the Validator::make
method:
$validator = Validator::make($input, $rules, $messages, [
'email' => 'email address',
]);
After Validation Hook
You may also attach callbacks to be run after validation is completed. This allows you to easily perform further validation and even add more error messages to the message collection. To get started, call the after
method on a validator instance:
$validator = Validator::make(/* ... */);
$validator->after(function ($validator) {
if ($this->somethingElseIsInvalid()) {
$validator->errors()->add(
'field', 'Something is wrong with this field!'
);
}
});
if ($validator->fails()) {
//
}
Working With Validated Input
After validating incoming request data using a form request or a manually created validator instance, you may wish to retrieve the incoming request data that actually underwent validation. This can be accomplished in several ways. First, you may call the validated
method on a form request or validator instance. This method returns an array of the data that was validated:
$validated = $request->validated();
$validated = $validator->validated();
Alternatively, you may call the safe
method on a form request or validator instance. This method returns an instance of IlluminateSupportValidatedInput
. This object exposes only
, except
, and all
methods to retrieve a subset of the validated data or the entire array of validated data:
$validated = $request->safe()->only(['name', 'email']);
$validated = $request->safe()->except(['name', 'email']);
$validated = $request->safe()->all();
In addition, the IlluminateSupportValidatedInput
instance may be iterated over and accessed like an array:
// Validated data may be iterated...
foreach ($request->safe() as $key => $value) {
//
}
// Validated data may be accessed as an array...
$validated = $request->safe();
$email = $validated['email'];
If you would like to add additional fields to the validated data, you may call the merge
method:
$validated = $request->safe()->merge(['name' => 'Taylor Otwell']);
If you would like to retrieve the validated data as a collection instance, you may call the collect
method:
$collection = $request->safe()->collect();
Working With Error Messages
After calling the errors
method on a Validator
instance, you will receive an IlluminateSupportMessageBag
instance, which has a variety of convenient methods for working with error messages. The $errors
variable that is automatically made available to all views is also an instance of the MessageBag
class.
Retrieving The First Error Message For A Field
To retrieve the first error message for a given field, use the first
method:
$errors = $validator->errors();
echo $errors->first('email');
Retrieving All Error Messages For A Field
If you need to retrieve an array of all the messages for a given field, use the get
method:
foreach ($errors->get('email') as $message) {
//
}
If you are validating an array form field, you may retrieve all of the messages for each of the array elements using the *
character:
foreach ($errors->get('attachments.*') as $message) {
//
}
Retrieving All Error Messages For All Fields
To retrieve an array of all messages for all fields, use the all
method:
foreach ($errors->all() as $message) {
//
}
Determining If Messages Exist For A Field
The has
method may be used to determine if any error messages exist for a given field:
if ($errors->has('email')) {
//
}
Specifying Custom Messages In Language Files
Laravel’s built-in validation rules each have an error message that is located in your application’s lang/en/validation.php
file. Within this file, you will find a translation entry for each validation rule. You are free to change or modify these messages based on the needs of your application.
In addition, you may copy this file to another translation language directory to translate the messages for your application’s language. To learn more about Laravel localization, check out the complete localization documentation.
Custom Messages For Specific Attributes
You may customize the error messages used for specified attribute and rule combinations within your application’s validation language files. To do so, add your message customizations to the custom
array of your application’s lang/xx/validation.php
language file:
'custom' => [
'email' => [
'required' => 'We need to know your email address!',
'max' => 'Your email address is too long!'
],
],
Specifying Attributes In Language Files
Many of Laravel’s built-in error messages include an :attribute
placeholder that is replaced with the name of the field or attribute under validation. If you would like the :attribute
portion of your validation message to be replaced with a custom value, you may specify the custom attribute name in the attributes
array of your lang/xx/validation.php
language file:
'attributes' => [
'email' => 'email address',
],
Specifying Values In Language Files
Some of Laravel’s built-in validation rule error messages contain a :value
placeholder that is replaced with the current value of the request attribute. However, you may occasionally need the :value
portion of your validation message to be replaced with a custom representation of the value. For example, consider the following rule that specifies that a credit card number is required if the payment_type
has a value of cc
:
Validator::make($request->all(), [
'credit_card_number' => 'required_if:payment_type,cc'
]);
If this validation rule fails, it will produce the following error message:
The credit card number field is required when payment type is cc.
Instead of displaying cc
as the payment type value, you may specify a more user-friendly value representation in your lang/xx/validation.php
language file by defining a values
array:
'values' => [
'payment_type' => [
'cc' => 'credit card'
],
],
After defining this value, the validation rule will produce the following error message:
The credit card number field is required when payment type is credit card.
Available Validation Rules
Below is a list of all available validation rules and their function:
<style>
.collection-method-list > p {
columns: 10.8em 3; -moz-columns: 10.8em 3; -webkit-columns: 10.8em 3;
}
.collection-method-list a {
display: block;
overflow: hidden;
text-overflow: ellipsis;
white-space: nowrap;
}
</style>
accepted
The field under validation must be "yes"
, "on"
, 1
, or true
. This is useful for validating «Terms of Service» acceptance or similar fields.
accepted_if:anotherfield,value,…
The field under validation must be "yes"
, "on"
, 1
, or true
if another field under validation is equal to a specified value. This is useful for validating «Terms of Service» acceptance or similar fields.
active_url
The field under validation must have a valid A or AAAA record according to the dns_get_record
PHP function. The hostname of the provided URL is extracted using the parse_url
PHP function before being passed to dns_get_record
.
after:date
The field under validation must be a value after a given date. The dates will be passed into the strtotime
PHP function in order to be converted to a valid DateTime
instance:
'start_date' => 'required|date|after:tomorrow'
Instead of passing a date string to be evaluated by strtotime
, you may specify another field to compare against the date:
'finish_date' => 'required|date|after:start_date'
after_or_equal:date
The field under validation must be a value after or equal to the given date. For more information, see the after rule.
alpha
The field under validation must be entirely Unicode alphabetic characters contained in p{L}
and p{M}
.
To restrict this validation rule to characters in the ASCII range (a-z
and A-Z
), you may provide the ascii
option to the validation rule:
'username' => 'alpha:ascii',
alpha_dash
The field under validation must be entirely Unicode alpha-numeric characters contained in p{L}
, p{M}
, p{N}
, as well as ASCII dashes (-
) and ASCII underscores (_
).
To restrict this validation rule to characters in the ASCII range (a-z
and A-Z
), you may provide the ascii
option to the validation rule:
'username' => 'alpha_dash:ascii',
alpha_num
The field under validation must be entirely Unicode alpha-numeric characters contained in p{L}
, p{M}
, and p{N}
.
To restrict this validation rule to characters in the ASCII range (a-z
and A-Z
), you may provide the ascii
option to the validation rule:
'username' => 'alpha_num:ascii',
array
The field under validation must be a PHP array
.
When additional values are provided to the array
rule, each key in the input array must be present within the list of values provided to the rule. In the following example, the admin
key in the input array is invalid since it is not contained in the list of values provided to the array
rule:
use IlluminateSupportFacadesValidator;
$input = [
'user' => [
'name' => 'Taylor Otwell',
'username' => 'taylorotwell',
'admin' => true,
],
];
Validator::make($input, [
'user' => 'array:name,username',
]);
In general, you should always specify the array keys that are allowed to be present within your array.
ascii
The field under validation must be entirely 7-bit ASCII characters.
bail
Stop running validation rules for the field after the first validation failure.
While the bail
rule will only stop validating a specific field when it encounters a validation failure, the stopOnFirstFailure
method will inform the validator that it should stop validating all attributes once a single validation failure has occurred:
if ($validator->stopOnFirstFailure()->fails()) {
// ...
}
before:date
The field under validation must be a value preceding the given date. The dates will be passed into the PHP strtotime
function in order to be converted into a valid DateTime
instance. In addition, like the after
rule, the name of another field under validation may be supplied as the value of date
.
before_or_equal:date
The field under validation must be a value preceding or equal to the given date. The dates will be passed into the PHP strtotime
function in order to be converted into a valid DateTime
instance. In addition, like the after
rule, the name of another field under validation may be supplied as the value of date
.
between:min,max
The field under validation must have a size between the given min and max (inclusive). Strings, numerics, arrays, and files are evaluated in the same fashion as the size
rule.
boolean
The field under validation must be able to be cast as a boolean. Accepted input are true
, false
, 1
, 0
, "1"
, and "0"
.
confirmed
The field under validation must have a matching field of {field}_confirmation
. For example, if the field under validation is password
, a matching password_confirmation
field must be present in the input.
current_password
The field under validation must match the authenticated user’s password. You may specify an authentication guard using the rule’s first parameter:
'password' => 'current_password:api'
date
The field under validation must be a valid, non-relative date according to the strtotime
PHP function.
date_equals:date
The field under validation must be equal to the given date. The dates will be passed into the PHP strtotime
function in order to be converted into a valid DateTime
instance.
date_format:format,…
The field under validation must match one of the given formats. You should use either date
or date_format
when validating a field, not both. This validation rule supports all formats supported by PHP’s DateTime class.
decimal:min,max
The field under validation must be numeric and must contain the specified number of decimal places:
// Must have exactly two decimal places (9.99)...
'price' => 'decimal:2'
// Must have between 2 and 4 decimal places...
'price' => 'decimal:2,4'
declined
The field under validation must be "no"
, "off"
, 0
, or false
.
declined_if:anotherfield,value,…
The field under validation must be "no"
, "off"
, 0
, or false
if another field under validation is equal to a specified value.
different:field
The field under validation must have a different value than field.
digits:value
The integer under validation must have an exact length of value.
digits_between:min,max
The integer validation must have a length between the given min and max.
dimensions
The file under validation must be an image meeting the dimension constraints as specified by the rule’s parameters:
'avatar' => 'dimensions:min_width=100,min_height=200'
Available constraints are: min_width, max_width, min_height, max_height, width, height, ratio.
A ratio constraint should be represented as width divided by height. This can be specified either by a fraction like 3/2
or a float like 1.5
:
'avatar' => 'dimensions:ratio=3/2'
Since this rule requires several arguments, you may use the Rule::dimensions
method to fluently construct the rule:
use IlluminateSupportFacadesValidator;
use IlluminateValidationRule;
Validator::make($data, [
'avatar' => [
'required',
Rule::dimensions()->maxWidth(1000)->maxHeight(500)->ratio(3 / 2),
],
]);
distinct
When validating arrays, the field under validation must not have any duplicate values:
Distinct uses loose variable comparisons by default. To use strict comparisons, you may add the strict
parameter to your validation rule definition:
'foo.*.id' => 'distinct:strict'
You may add ignore_case
to the validation rule’s arguments to make the rule ignore capitalization differences:
'foo.*.id' => 'distinct:ignore_case'
doesnt_start_with:foo,bar,…
The field under validation must not start with one of the given values.
doesnt_end_with:foo,bar,…
The field under validation must not end with one of the given values.
The field under validation must be formatted as an email address. This validation rule utilizes the egulias/email-validator
package for validating the email address. By default, the RFCValidation
validator is applied, but you can apply other validation styles as well:
'email' => 'email:rfc,dns'
The example above will apply the RFCValidation
and DNSCheckValidation
validations. Here’s a full list of validation styles you can apply:
rfc
:RFCValidation
strict
:NoRFCWarningsValidation
dns
:DNSCheckValidation
spoof
:SpoofCheckValidation
filter
:FilterEmailValidation
filter_unicode
:FilterEmailValidation::unicode()
The filter
validator, which uses PHP’s filter_var
function, ships with Laravel and was Laravel’s default email validation behavior prior to Laravel version 5.8.
Warning
Thedns
andspoof
validators require the PHPintl
extension.
ends_with:foo,bar,…
The field under validation must end with one of the given values.
enum
The Enum
rule is a class based rule that validates whether the field under validation contains a valid enum value. The Enum
rule accepts the name of the enum as its only constructor argument:
use AppEnumsServerStatus;
use IlluminateValidationRulesEnum;
$request->validate([
'status' => [new Enum(ServerStatus::class)],
]);
Warning
Enums are only available on PHP 8.1+.
exclude
The field under validation will be excluded from the request data returned by the validate
and validated
methods.
exclude_if:anotherfield,value
The field under validation will be excluded from the request data returned by the validate
and validated
methods if the anotherfield field is equal to value.
If complex conditional exclusion logic is required, you may utilize the Rule::excludeIf
method. This method accepts a boolean or a closure. When given a closure, the closure should return true
or false
to indicate if the field under validation should be excluded:
use IlluminateSupportFacadesValidator;
use IlluminateValidationRule;
Validator::make($request->all(), [
'role_id' => Rule::excludeIf($request->user()->is_admin),
]);
Validator::make($request->all(), [
'role_id' => Rule::excludeIf(fn () => $request->user()->is_admin),
]);
exclude_unless:anotherfield,value
The field under validation will be excluded from the request data returned by the validate
and validated
methods unless anotherfield‘s field is equal to value. If value is null
(exclude_unless:name,null
), the field under validation will be excluded unless the comparison field is null
or the comparison field is missing from the request data.
exclude_with:anotherfield
The field under validation will be excluded from the request data returned by the validate
and validated
methods if the anotherfield field is present.
exclude_without:anotherfield
The field under validation will be excluded from the request data returned by the validate
and validated
methods if the anotherfield field is not present.
exists:table,column
The field under validation must exist in a given database table.
Basic Usage Of Exists Rule
'state' => 'exists:states'
If the column
option is not specified, the field name will be used. So, in this case, the rule will validate that the states
database table contains a record with a state
column value matching the request’s state
attribute value.
Specifying A Custom Column Name
You may explicitly specify the database column name that should be used by the validation rule by placing it after the database table name:
'state' => 'exists:states,abbreviation'
Occasionally, you may need to specify a specific database connection to be used for the exists
query. You can accomplish this by prepending the connection name to the table name:
'email' => 'exists:connection.staff,email'
Instead of specifying the table name directly, you may specify the Eloquent model which should be used to determine the table name:
'user_id' => 'exists:AppModelsUser,id'
If you would like to customize the query executed by the validation rule, you may use the Rule
class to fluently define the rule. In this example, we’ll also specify the validation rules as an array instead of using the |
character to delimit them:
use IlluminateSupportFacadesValidator;
use IlluminateValidationRule;
Validator::make($data, [
'email' => [
'required',
Rule::exists('staff')->where(function ($query) {
return $query->where('account_id', 1);
}),
],
]);
You may explicitly specify the database column name that should be used by the exists
rule generated by the Rule::exists
method by providing the column name as the second argument to the exists
method:
'state' => Rule::exists('states', 'abbreviation'),
file
The field under validation must be a successfully uploaded file.
filled
The field under validation must not be empty when it is present.
gt:field
The field under validation must be greater than the given field. The two fields must be of the same type. Strings, numerics, arrays, and files are evaluated using the same conventions as the size
rule.
gte:field
The field under validation must be greater than or equal to the given field. The two fields must be of the same type. Strings, numerics, arrays, and files are evaluated using the same conventions as the size
rule.
image
The file under validation must be an image (jpg, jpeg, png, bmp, gif, svg, or webp).
in:foo,bar,…
The field under validation must be included in the given list of values. Since this rule often requires you to implode
an array, the Rule::in
method may be used to fluently construct the rule:
use IlluminateSupportFacadesValidator;
use IlluminateValidationRule;
Validator::make($data, [
'zones' => [
'required',
Rule::in(['first-zone', 'second-zone']),
],
]);
When the in
rule is combined with the array
rule, each value in the input array must be present within the list of values provided to the in
rule. In the following example, the LAS
airport code in the input array is invalid since it is not contained in the list of airports provided to the in
rule:
use IlluminateSupportFacadesValidator;
use IlluminateValidationRule;
$input = [
'airports' => ['NYC', 'LAS'],
];
Validator::make($input, [
'airports' => [
'required',
'array',
],
'airports.*' => Rule::in(['NYC', 'LIT']),
]);
in_array:anotherfield.*
The field under validation must exist in anotherfield‘s values.
integer
The field under validation must be an integer.
Warning
This validation rule does not verify that the input is of the «integer» variable type, only that the input is of a type accepted by PHP’sFILTER_VALIDATE_INT
rule. If you need to validate the input as being a number please use this rule in combination with thenumeric
validation rule.
ip
The field under validation must be an IP address.
ipv4
The field under validation must be an IPv4 address.
ipv6
The field under validation must be an IPv6 address.
json
The field under validation must be a valid JSON string.
lt:field
The field under validation must be less than the given field. The two fields must be of the same type. Strings, numerics, arrays, and files are evaluated using the same conventions as the size
rule.
lte:field
The field under validation must be less than or equal to the given field. The two fields must be of the same type. Strings, numerics, arrays, and files are evaluated using the same conventions as the size
rule.
lowercase
The field under validation must be lowercase.
mac_address
The field under validation must be a MAC address.
max:value
The field under validation must be less than or equal to a maximum value. Strings, numerics, arrays, and files are evaluated in the same fashion as the size
rule.
max_digits:value
The integer under validation must have a maximum length of value.
mimetypes:text/plain,…
The file under validation must match one of the given MIME types:
'video' => 'mimetypes:video/avi,video/mpeg,video/quicktime'
To determine the MIME type of the uploaded file, the file’s contents will be read and the framework will attempt to guess the MIME type, which may be different from the client’s provided MIME type.
mimes:foo,bar,…
The file under validation must have a MIME type corresponding to one of the listed extensions.
Basic Usage Of MIME Rule
'photo' => 'mimes:jpg,bmp,png'
Even though you only need to specify the extensions, this rule actually validates the MIME type of the file by reading the file’s contents and guessing its MIME type. A full listing of MIME types and their corresponding extensions may be found at the following location:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/conf/mime.types
min:value
The field under validation must have a minimum value. Strings, numerics, arrays, and files are evaluated in the same fashion as the size
rule.
min_digits:value
The integer under validation must have a minimum length of value.
multiple_of:value
The field under validation must be a multiple of value.
missing
The field under validation must not be present in the input data.
missing_if:anotherfield,value,…
The field under validation must not be present if the anotherfield field is equal to any value.
missing_unless:anotherfield,value
The field under validation must not be present unless the anotherfield field is equal to any value.
missing_with:foo,bar,…
The field under validation must not be present only if any of the other specified fields are present.
missing_with_all:foo,bar,…
The field under validation must not be present only if all of the other specified fields are present.
not_in:foo,bar,…
The field under validation must not be included in the given list of values. The Rule::notIn
method may be used to fluently construct the rule:
use IlluminateValidationRule;
Validator::make($data, [
'toppings' => [
'required',
Rule::notIn(['sprinkles', 'cherries']),
],
]);
not_regex:pattern
The field under validation must not match the given regular expression.
Internally, this rule uses the PHP preg_match
function. The pattern specified should obey the same formatting required by preg_match
and thus also include valid delimiters. For example: 'email' => 'not_regex:/^.+$/i'
.
Warning
When using theregex
/not_regex
patterns, it may be necessary to specify your validation rules using an array instead of using|
delimiters, especially if the regular expression contains a|
character.
nullable
The field under validation may be null
.
numeric
The field under validation must be numeric.
password
The field under validation must match the authenticated user’s password.
Warning
This rule was renamed tocurrent_password
with the intention of removing it in Laravel 9. Please use the Current Password rule instead.
present
The field under validation must exist in the input data.
prohibited
The field under validation must be missing or empty. A field is «empty» if it meets one of the following criteria:
- The value is
null
. - The value is an empty string.
- The value is an empty array or empty
Countable
object. - The value is an uploaded file with an empty path.
prohibited_if:anotherfield,value,…
The field under validation must be missing or empty if the anotherfield field is equal to any value. A field is «empty» if it meets one of the following criteria:
- The value is
null
. - The value is an empty string.
- The value is an empty array or empty
Countable
object. - The value is an uploaded file with an empty path.
If complex conditional prohibition logic is required, you may utilize the Rule::prohibitedIf
method. This method accepts a boolean or a closure. When given a closure, the closure should return true
or false
to indicate if the field under validation should be prohibited:
use IlluminateSupportFacadesValidator;
use IlluminateValidationRule;
Validator::make($request->all(), [
'role_id' => Rule::prohibitedIf($request->user()->is_admin),
]);
Validator::make($request->all(), [
'role_id' => Rule::prohibitedIf(fn () => $request->user()->is_admin),
]);
prohibited_unless:anotherfield,value,…
The field under validation must be missing or empty unless the anotherfield field is equal to any value. A field is «empty» if it meets one of the following criteria:
- The value is
null
. - The value is an empty string.
- The value is an empty array or empty
Countable
object. - The value is an uploaded file with an empty path.
prohibits:anotherfield,…
If the field under validation is not missing or empty, all fields in anotherfield must be missing or empty. A field is «empty» if it meets one of the following criteria:
- The value is
null
. - The value is an empty string.
- The value is an empty array or empty
Countable
object. - The value is an uploaded file with an empty path.
regex:pattern
The field under validation must match the given regular expression.
Internally, this rule uses the PHP preg_match
function. The pattern specified should obey the same formatting required by preg_match
and thus also include valid delimiters. For example: 'email' => 'regex:/^.+@.+$/i'
.
Warning
When using theregex
/not_regex
patterns, it may be necessary to specify rules in an array instead of using|
delimiters, especially if the regular expression contains a|
character.
required
The field under validation must be present in the input data and not empty. A field is «empty» if it meets one of the following criteria:
- The value is
null
. - The value is an empty string.
- The value is an empty array or empty
Countable
object. - The value is an uploaded file with no path.
required_if:anotherfield,value,…
The field under validation must be present and not empty if the anotherfield field is equal to any value.
If you would like to construct a more complex condition for the required_if
rule, you may use the Rule::requiredIf
method. This method accepts a boolean or a closure. When passed a closure, the closure should return true
or false
to indicate if the field under validation is required:
use IlluminateSupportFacadesValidator;
use IlluminateValidationRule;
Validator::make($request->all(), [
'role_id' => Rule::requiredIf($request->user()->is_admin),
]);
Validator::make($request->all(), [
'role_id' => Rule::requiredIf(fn () => $request->user()->is_admin),
]);
required_unless:anotherfield,value,…
The field under validation must be present and not empty unless the anotherfield field is equal to any value. This also means anotherfield must be present in the request data unless value is null
. If value is null
(required_unless:name,null
), the field under validation will be required unless the comparison field is null
or the comparison field is missing from the request data.
required_with:foo,bar,…
The field under validation must be present and not empty only if any of the other specified fields are present and not empty.
required_with_all:foo,bar,…
The field under validation must be present and not empty only if all of the other specified fields are present and not empty.
required_without:foo,bar,…
The field under validation must be present and not empty only when any of the other specified fields are empty or not present.
required_without_all:foo,bar,…
The field under validation must be present and not empty only when all of the other specified fields are empty or not present.
required_array_keys:foo,bar,…
The field under validation must be an array and must contain at least the specified keys.
same:field
The given field must match the field under validation.
size:value
The field under validation must have a size matching the given value. For string data, value corresponds to the number of characters. For numeric data, value corresponds to a given integer value (the attribute must also have the numeric
or integer
rule). For an array, size corresponds to the count
of the array. For files, size corresponds to the file size in kilobytes. Let’s look at some examples:
// Validate that a string is exactly 12 characters long...
'title' => 'size:12';
// Validate that a provided integer equals 10...
'seats' => 'integer|size:10';
// Validate that an array has exactly 5 elements...
'tags' => 'array|size:5';
// Validate that an uploaded file is exactly 512 kilobytes...
'image' => 'file|size:512';
starts_with:foo,bar,…
The field under validation must start with one of the given values.
string
The field under validation must be a string. If you would like to allow the field to also be null
, you should assign the nullable
rule to the field.
timezone
The field under validation must be a valid timezone identifier according to the timezone_identifiers_list
PHP function.
unique:table,column
The field under validation must not exist within the given database table.
Specifying A Custom Table / Column Name:
Instead of specifying the table name directly, you may specify the Eloquent model which should be used to determine the table name:
'email' => 'unique:AppModelsUser,email_address'
The column
option may be used to specify the field’s corresponding database column. If the column
option is not specified, the name of the field under validation will be used.
'email' => 'unique:users,email_address'
Specifying A Custom Database Connection
Occasionally, you may need to set a custom connection for database queries made by the Validator. To accomplish this, you may prepend the connection name to the table name:
'email' => 'unique:connection.users,email_address'
Forcing A Unique Rule To Ignore A Given ID:
Sometimes, you may wish to ignore a given ID during unique validation. For example, consider an «update profile» screen that includes the user’s name, email address, and location. You will probably want to verify that the email address is unique. However, if the user only changes the name field and not the email field, you do not want a validation error to be thrown because the user is already the owner of the email address in question.
To instruct the validator to ignore the user’s ID, we’ll use the Rule
class to fluently define the rule. In this example, we’ll also specify the validation rules as an array instead of using the |
character to delimit the rules:
use IlluminateSupportFacadesValidator;
use IlluminateValidationRule;
Validator::make($data, [
'email' => [
'required',
Rule::unique('users')->ignore($user->id),
],
]);
Warning
You should never pass any user controlled request input into theignore
method. Instead, you should only pass a system generated unique ID such as an auto-incrementing ID or UUID from an Eloquent model instance. Otherwise, your application will be vulnerable to an SQL injection attack.
Instead of passing the model key’s value to the ignore
method, you may also pass the entire model instance. Laravel will automatically extract the key from the model:
Rule::unique('users')->ignore($user)
If your table uses a primary key column name other than id
, you may specify the name of the column when calling the ignore
method:
Rule::unique('users')->ignore($user->id, 'user_id')
By default, the unique
rule will check the uniqueness of the column matching the name of the attribute being validated. However, you may pass a different column name as the second argument to the unique
method:
Rule::unique('users', 'email_address')->ignore($user->id),
Adding Additional Where Clauses:
You may specify additional query conditions by customizing the query using the where
method. For example, let’s add a query condition that scopes the query to only search records that have an account_id
column value of 1
:
'email' => Rule::unique('users')->where(fn ($query) => $query->where('account_id', 1))
uppercase
The field under validation must be uppercase.
url
The field under validation must be a valid URL.
ulid
The field under validation must be a valid Universally Unique Lexicographically Sortable Identifier (ULID).
uuid
The field under validation must be a valid RFC 4122 (version 1, 3, 4, or 5) universally unique identifier (UUID).
Conditionally Adding Rules
Skipping Validation When Fields Have Certain Values
You may occasionally wish to not validate a given field if another field has a given value. You may accomplish this using the exclude_if
validation rule. In this example, the appointment_date
and doctor_name
fields will not be validated if the has_appointment
field has a value of false
:
use IlluminateSupportFacadesValidator;
$validator = Validator::make($data, [
'has_appointment' => 'required|boolean',
'appointment_date' => 'exclude_if:has_appointment,false|required|date',
'doctor_name' => 'exclude_if:has_appointment,false|required|string',
]);
Alternatively, you may use the exclude_unless
rule to not validate a given field unless another field has a given value:
$validator = Validator::make($data, [
'has_appointment' => 'required|boolean',
'appointment_date' => 'exclude_unless:has_appointment,true|required|date',
'doctor_name' => 'exclude_unless:has_appointment,true|required|string',
]);
Validating When Present
In some situations, you may wish to run validation checks against a field only if that field is present in the data being validated. To quickly accomplish this, add the sometimes
rule to your rule list:
$v = Validator::make($data, [
'email' => 'sometimes|required|email',
]);
In the example above, the email
field will only be validated if it is present in the $data
array.
Note
If you are attempting to validate a field that should always be present but may be empty, check out this note on optional fields.
Complex Conditional Validation
Sometimes you may wish to add validation rules based on more complex conditional logic. For example, you may wish to require a given field only if another field has a greater value than 100. Or, you may need two fields to have a given value only when another field is present. Adding these validation rules doesn’t have to be a pain. First, create a Validator
instance with your static rules that never change:
use IlluminateSupportFacadesValidator;
$validator = Validator::make($request->all(), [
'email' => 'required|email',
'games' => 'required|numeric',
]);
Let’s assume our web application is for game collectors. If a game collector registers with our application and they own more than 100 games, we want them to explain why they own so many games. For example, perhaps they run a game resale shop, or maybe they just enjoy collecting games. To conditionally add this requirement, we can use the sometimes
method on the Validator
instance.
$validator->sometimes('reason', 'required|max:500', function ($input) {
return $input->games >= 100;
});
The first argument passed to the sometimes
method is the name of the field we are conditionally validating. The second argument is a list of the rules we want to add. If the closure passed as the third argument returns true
, the rules will be added. This method makes it a breeze to build complex conditional validations. You may even add conditional validations for several fields at once:
$validator->sometimes(['reason', 'cost'], 'required', function ($input) {
return $input->games >= 100;
});
Note
The$input
parameter passed to your closure will be an instance ofIlluminateSupportFluent
and may be used to access your input and files under validation.
Complex Conditional Array Validation
Sometimes you may want to validate a field based on another field in the same nested array whose index you do not know. In these situations, you may allow your closure to receive a second argument which will be the current individual item in the array being validated:
$input = [
'channels' => [
[
'type' => 'email',
'address' => 'abigail@example.com',
],
[
'type' => 'url',
'address' => 'https://example.com',
],
],
];
$validator->sometimes('channels.*.address', 'email', function ($input, $item) {
return $item->type === 'email';
});
$validator->sometimes('channels.*.address', 'url', function ($input, $item) {
return $item->type !== 'email';
});
Like the $input
parameter passed to the closure, the $item
parameter is an instance of IlluminateSupportFluent
when the attribute data is an array; otherwise, it is a string.
Validating Arrays
As discussed in the array
validation rule documentation, the array
rule accepts a list of allowed array keys. If any additional keys are present within the array, validation will fail:
use IlluminateSupportFacadesValidator;
$input = [
'user' => [
'name' => 'Taylor Otwell',
'username' => 'taylorotwell',
'admin' => true,
],
];
Validator::make($input, [
'user' => 'array:username,locale',
]);
In general, you should always specify the array keys that are allowed to be present within your array. Otherwise, the validator’s validate
and validated
methods will return all of the validated data, including the array and all of its keys, even if those keys were not validated by other nested array validation rules.
Validating Nested Array Input
Validating nested array based form input fields doesn’t have to be a pain. You may use «dot notation» to validate attributes within an array. For example, if the incoming HTTP request contains a photos[profile]
field, you may validate it like so:
use IlluminateSupportFacadesValidator;
$validator = Validator::make($request->all(), [
'photos.profile' => 'required|image',
]);
You may also validate each element of an array. For example, to validate that each email in a given array input field is unique, you may do the following:
$validator = Validator::make($request->all(), [
'person.*.email' => 'email|unique:users',
'person.*.first_name' => 'required_with:person.*.last_name',
]);
Likewise, you may use the *
character when specifying custom validation messages in your language files, making it a breeze to use a single validation message for array based fields:
'custom' => [
'person.*.email' => [
'unique' => 'Each person must have a unique email address',
]
],
Accessing Nested Array Data
Sometimes you may need to access the value for a given nested array element when assigning validation rules to the attribute. You may accomplish this using the Rule::forEach
method. The forEach
method accepts a closure that will be invoked for each iteration of the array attribute under validation and will receive the attribute’s value and explicit, fully-expanded attribute name. The closure should return an array of rules to assign to the array element:
use AppRulesHasPermission;
use IlluminateSupportFacadesValidator;
use IlluminateValidationRule;
$validator = Validator::make($request->all(), [
'companies.*.id' => Rule::forEach(function ($value, $attribute) {
return [
Rule::exists(Company::class, 'id'),
new HasPermission('manage-company', $value),
];
}),
]);
Error Message Indexes & Positions
When validating arrays, you may want to reference the index or position of a particular item that failed validation within the error message displayed by your application. To accomplish this, you may include the :index
(starts from 0
) and :position
(starts from 1
) placeholders within your custom validation message:
use IlluminateSupportFacadesValidator;
$input = [
'photos' => [
[
'name' => 'BeachVacation.jpg',
'description' => 'A photo of my beach vacation!',
],
[
'name' => 'GrandCanyon.jpg',
'description' => '',
],
],
];
Validator::validate($input, [
'photos.*.description' => 'required',
], [
'photos.*.description.required' => 'Please describe photo #:position.',
]);
Given the example above, validation will fail and the user will be presented with the following error of «Please describe photo #2.»
Validating Files
Laravel provides a variety of validation rules that may be used to validate uploaded files, such as mimes
, image
, min
, and max
. While you are free to specify these rules individually when validating files, Laravel also offers a fluent file validation rule builder that you may find convenient:
use IlluminateSupportFacadesValidator;
use IlluminateValidationRulesFile;
Validator::validate($input, [
'attachment' => [
'required',
File::types(['mp3', 'wav'])
->min(1024)
->max(12 * 1024),
],
]);
If your application accepts images uploaded by your users, you may use the File
rule’s image
constructor method to indicate that the uploaded file should be an image. In addition, the dimensions
rule may be used to limit the dimensions of the image:
use IlluminateSupportFacadesValidator;
use IlluminateValidationRulesFile;
Validator::validate($input, [
'photo' => [
'required',
File::image()
->min(1024)
->max(12 * 1024)
->dimensions(Rule::dimensions()->maxWidth(1000)->maxHeight(500)),
],
]);
Note
More information regarding validating image dimensions may be found in the dimension rule documentation.
File Types
Even though you only need to specify the extensions when invoking the types
method, this method actually validates the MIME type of the file by reading the file’s contents and guessing its MIME type. A full listing of MIME types and their corresponding extensions may be found at the following location:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/conf/mime.types
Validating Passwords
To ensure that passwords have an adequate level of complexity, you may use Laravel’s Password
rule object:
use IlluminateSupportFacadesValidator;
use IlluminateValidationRulesPassword;
$validator = Validator::make($request->all(), [
'password' => ['required', 'confirmed', Password::min(8)],
]);
The Password
rule object allows you to easily customize the password complexity requirements for your application, such as specifying that passwords require at least one letter, number, symbol, or characters with mixed casing:
// Require at least 8 characters...
Password::min(8)
// Require at least one letter...
Password::min(8)->letters()
// Require at least one uppercase and one lowercase letter...
Password::min(8)->mixedCase()
// Require at least one number...
Password::min(8)->numbers()
// Require at least one symbol...
Password::min(8)->symbols()
In addition, you may ensure that a password has not been compromised in a public password data breach leak using the uncompromised
method:
Password::min(8)->uncompromised()
Internally, the Password
rule object uses the k-Anonymity model to determine if a password has been leaked via the haveibeenpwned.com service without sacrificing the user’s privacy or security.
By default, if a password appears at least once in a data leak, it will be considered compromised. You can customize this threshold using the first argument of the uncompromised
method:
// Ensure the password appears less than 3 times in the same data leak...
Password::min(8)->uncompromised(3);
Of course, you may chain all the methods in the examples above:
Password::min(8)
->letters()
->mixedCase()
->numbers()
->symbols()
->uncompromised()
Defining Default Password Rules
You may find it convenient to specify the default validation rules for passwords in a single location of your application. You can easily accomplish this using the Password::defaults
method, which accepts a closure. The closure given to the defaults
method should return the default configuration of the Password rule. Typically, the defaults
rule should be called within the boot
method of one of your application’s service providers:
use IlluminateValidationRulesPassword; /** * Bootstrap any application services. * * @return void */ public function boot() { Password::defaults(function () { $rule = Password::min(8); return $this->app->isProduction() ? $rule->mixedCase()->uncompromised() : $rule; }); }
Then, when you would like to apply the default rules to a particular password undergoing validation, you may invoke the defaults
method with no arguments:
'password' => ['required', Password::defaults()],
Occasionally, you may want to attach additional validation rules to your default password validation rules. You may use the rules
method to accomplish this:
use AppRulesZxcvbnRule;
Password::defaults(function () {
$rule = Password::min(8)->rules([new ZxcvbnRule]);
// ...
});
Custom Validation Rules
Using Rule Objects
Laravel provides a variety of helpful validation rules; however, you may wish to specify some of your own. One method of registering custom validation rules is using rule objects. To generate a new rule object, you may use the make:rule
Artisan command. Let’s use this command to generate a rule that verifies a string is uppercase. Laravel will place the new rule in the app/Rules
directory. If this directory does not exist, Laravel will create it when you execute the Artisan command to create your rule:
php artisan make:rule Uppercase --invokable
Once the rule has been created, we are ready to define its behavior. A rule object contains a single method: __invoke
. This method receives the attribute name, its value, and a callback that should be invoked on failure with the validation error message:
<?php
namespace AppRules;
use IlluminateContractsValidationInvokableRule;
class Uppercase implements InvokableRule
{
/**
* Run the validation rule.
*
* @param string $attribute
* @param mixed $value
* @param Closure $fail
* @return void
*/
public function __invoke($attribute, $value, $fail)
{
if (strtoupper($value) !== $value) {
$fail('The :attribute must be uppercase.');
}
}
}
Once the rule has been defined, you may attach it to a validator by passing an instance of the rule object with your other validation rules:
use AppRulesUppercase;
$request->validate([
'name' => ['required', 'string', new Uppercase],
]);
Translating Validation Messages
Instead of providing a literal error message to the $fail
closure, you may also provide a translation string key and instruct Laravel to translate the error message:
if (strtoupper($value) !== $value) {
$fail('validation.uppercase')->translate();
}
If necessary, you may provide placeholder replacements and the preferred language as the first and second arguments to the translate
method:
$fail('validation.location')->translate([
'value' => $this->value,
], 'fr')
Accessing Additional Data
If your custom validation rule class needs to access all of the other data undergoing validation, your rule class may implement the IlluminateContractsValidationDataAwareRule
interface. This interface requires your class to define a setData
method. This method will automatically be invoked by Laravel (before validation proceeds) with all of the data under validation:
<?php
namespace AppRules;
use IlluminateContractsValidationDataAwareRule;
use IlluminateContractsValidationInvokableRule;
class Uppercase implements DataAwareRule, InvokableRule
{
/**
* All of the data under validation.
*
* @var array
*/
protected $data = [];
// ...
/**
* Set the data under validation.
*
* @param array $data
* @return $this
*/
public function setData($data)
{
$this->data = $data;
return $this;
}
}
Or, if your validation rule requires access to the validator instance performing the validation, you may implement the ValidatorAwareRule
interface:
<?php
namespace AppRules;
use IlluminateContractsValidationInvokableRule;
use IlluminateContractsValidationValidatorAwareRule;
class Uppercase implements InvokableRule, ValidatorAwareRule
{
/**
* The validator instance.
*
* @var IlluminateValidationValidator
*/
protected $validator;
// ...
/**
* Set the current validator.
*
* @param IlluminateValidationValidator $validator
* @return $this
*/
public function setValidator($validator)
{
$this->validator = $validator;
return $this;
}
}
Using Closures
If you only need the functionality of a custom rule once throughout your application, you may use a closure instead of a rule object. The closure receives the attribute’s name, the attribute’s value, and a $fail
callback that should be called if validation fails:
use IlluminateSupportFacadesValidator;
$validator = Validator::make($request->all(), [
'title' => [
'required',
'max:255',
function ($attribute, $value, $fail) {
if ($value === 'foo') {
$fail('The '.$attribute.' is invalid.');
}
},
],
]);
Implicit Rules
By default, when an attribute being validated is not present or contains an empty string, normal validation rules, including custom rules, are not run. For example, the unique
rule will not be run against an empty string:
use IlluminateSupportFacadesValidator;
$rules = ['name' => 'unique:users,name'];
$input = ['name' => ''];
Validator::make($input, $rules)->passes(); // true
For a custom rule to run even when an attribute is empty, the rule must imply that the attribute is required. To quickly generate a new implicit rule object, you may use the make:rule
Artisan command with the --implicit
option:
php artisan make:rule Uppercase --invokable --implicit
Warning
An «implicit» rule only implies that the attribute is required. Whether it actually invalidates a missing or empty attribute is up to you.
Version
Validation
- Introduction
-
Validation Quickstart
- Defining The Routes
- Creating The Controller
- Writing The Validation Logic
- Displaying The Validation Errors
- Repopulating Forms
- A Note On Optional Fields
- Validation Error Response Format
-
Form Request Validation
- Creating Form Requests
- Authorizing Form Requests
- Customizing The Error Messages
- Preparing Input For Validation
-
Manually Creating Validators
- Automatic Redirection
- Named Error Bags
- Customizing The Error Messages
- After Validation Hook
- Working With Validated Input
-
Working With Error Messages
- Specifying Custom Messages In Language Files
- Specifying Attributes In Language Files
- Specifying Values In Language Files
- Available Validation Rules
- Conditionally Adding Rules
-
Validating Arrays
- Validating Nested Array Input
- Error Message Indexes & Positions
- Validating Files
- Validating Passwords
-
Custom Validation Rules
- Using Rule Objects
- Using Closures
- Implicit Rules
Introduction
Laravel provides several different approaches to validate your application’s incoming data. It is most common to use the validate
method available on all incoming HTTP requests. However, we will discuss other approaches to validation as well.
Laravel includes a wide variety of convenient validation rules that you may apply to data, even providing the ability to validate if values are unique in a given database table. We’ll cover each of these validation rules in detail so that you are familiar with all of Laravel’s validation features.
Validation Quickstart
To learn about Laravel’s powerful validation features, let’s look at a complete example of validating a form and displaying the error messages back to the user. By reading this high-level overview, you’ll be able to gain a good general understanding of how to validate incoming request data using Laravel:
Defining The Routes
First, let’s assume we have the following routes defined in our routes/web.php
file:
use AppHttpControllersPostController;
Route::get('/post/create', [PostController::class, 'create']);
Route::post('/post', [PostController::class, 'store']);
The GET
route will display a form for the user to create a new blog post, while the POST
route will store the new blog post in the database.
Creating The Controller
Next, let’s take a look at a simple controller that handles incoming requests to these routes. We’ll leave the store
method empty for now:
<?php
namespace AppHttpControllers;
use AppHttpControllersController;
use IlluminateHttpRequest;
class PostController extends Controller
{
/**
* Show the form to create a new blog post.
*
* @return IlluminateViewView
*/
public function create()
{
return view('post.create');
}
/**
* Store a new blog post.
*
* @param IlluminateHttpRequest $request
* @return IlluminateHttpResponse
*/
public function store(Request $request)
{
// Validate and store the blog post...
}
}
Writing The Validation Logic
Now we are ready to fill in our store
method with the logic to validate the new blog post. To do this, we will use the validate
method provided by the IlluminateHttpRequest
object. If the validation rules pass, your code will keep executing normally; however, if validation fails, an IlluminateValidationValidationException
exception will be thrown and the proper error response will automatically be sent back to the user.
If validation fails during a traditional HTTP request, a redirect response to the previous URL will be generated. If the incoming request is an XHR request, a JSON response containing the validation error messages will be returned.
To get a better understanding of the validate
method, let’s jump back into the store
method:
/**
* Store a new blog post.
*
* @param IlluminateHttpRequest $request
* @return IlluminateHttpResponse
*/
public function store(Request $request)
{
$validated = $request->validate([
'title' => 'required|unique:posts|max:255',
'body' => 'required',
]);
// The blog post is valid...
}
As you can see, the validation rules are passed into the validate
method. Don’t worry — all available validation rules are documented. Again, if the validation fails, the proper response will automatically be generated. If the validation passes, our controller will continue executing normally.
Alternatively, validation rules may be specified as arrays of rules instead of a single |
delimited string:
$validatedData = $request->validate([
'title' => ['required', 'unique:posts', 'max:255'],
'body' => ['required'],
]);
In addition, you may use the validateWithBag
method to validate a request and store any error messages within a named error bag:
$validatedData = $request->validateWithBag('post', [
'title' => ['required', 'unique:posts', 'max:255'],
'body' => ['required'],
]);
Stopping On First Validation Failure
Sometimes you may wish to stop running validation rules on an attribute after the first validation failure. To do so, assign the bail
rule to the attribute:
$request->validate([
'title' => 'bail|required|unique:posts|max:255',
'body' => 'required',
]);
In this example, if the unique
rule on the title
attribute fails, the max
rule will not be checked. Rules will be validated in the order they are assigned.
A Note On Nested Attributes
If the incoming HTTP request contains «nested» field data, you may specify these fields in your validation rules using «dot» syntax:
$request->validate([
'title' => 'required|unique:posts|max:255',
'author.name' => 'required',
'author.description' => 'required',
]);
On the other hand, if your field name contains a literal period, you can explicitly prevent this from being interpreted as «dot» syntax by escaping the period with a backslash:
$request->validate([
'title' => 'required|unique:posts|max:255',
'v1.0' => 'required',
]);
Displaying The Validation Errors
So, what if the incoming request fields do not pass the given validation rules? As mentioned previously, Laravel will automatically redirect the user back to their previous location. In addition, all of the validation errors and request input will automatically be flashed to the session.
An $errors
variable is shared with all of your application’s views by the IlluminateViewMiddlewareShareErrorsFromSession
middleware, which is provided by the web
middleware group. When this middleware is applied an $errors
variable will always be available in your views, allowing you to conveniently assume the $errors
variable is always defined and can be safely used. The $errors
variable will be an instance of IlluminateSupportMessageBag
. For more information on working with this object, check out its documentation.
So, in our example, the user will be redirected to our controller’s create
method when validation fails, allowing us to display the error messages in the view:
<!-- /resources/views/post/create.blade.php -->
<h1>Create Post</h1>
@if ($errors->any())
<div class="alert alert-danger">
<ul>
@foreach ($errors->all() as $error)
<li>{{ $error }}</li>
@endforeach
</ul>
</div>
@endif
<!-- Create Post Form -->
Customizing The Error Messages
Laravel’s built-in validation rules each have an error message that is located in your application’s lang/en/validation.php
file. Within this file, you will find a translation entry for each validation rule. You are free to change or modify these messages based on the needs of your application.
In addition, you may copy this file to another translation language directory to translate the messages for your application’s language. To learn more about Laravel localization, check out the complete localization documentation.
XHR Requests & Validation
In this example, we used a traditional form to send data to the application. However, many applications receive XHR requests from a JavaScript powered frontend. When using the validate
method during an XHR request, Laravel will not generate a redirect response. Instead, Laravel generates a JSON response containing all of the validation errors. This JSON response will be sent with a 422 HTTP status code.
The @error
Directive
You may use the @error
Blade directive to quickly determine if validation error messages exist for a given attribute. Within an @error
directive, you may echo the $message
variable to display the error message:
<!-- /resources/views/post/create.blade.php -->
<label for="title">Post Title</label>
<input id="title"
type="text"
name="title"
class="@error('title') is-invalid @enderror">
@error('title')
<div class="alert alert-danger">{{ $message }}</div>
@enderror
If you are using named error bags, you may pass the name of the error bag as the second argument to the @error
directive:
<input ... class="@error('title', 'post') is-invalid @enderror">
Repopulating Forms
When Laravel generates a redirect response due to a validation error, the framework will automatically flash all of the request’s input to the session. This is done so that you may conveniently access the input during the next request and repopulate the form that the user attempted to submit.
To retrieve flashed input from the previous request, invoke the old
method on an instance of IlluminateHttpRequest
. The old
method will pull the previously flashed input data from the session:
$title = $request->old('title');
Laravel also provides a global old
helper. If you are displaying old input within a Blade template, it is more convenient to use the old
helper to repopulate the form. If no old input exists for the given field, null
will be returned:
<input type="text" name="title" value="{{ old('title') }}">
A Note On Optional Fields
By default, Laravel includes the TrimStrings
and ConvertEmptyStringsToNull
middleware in your application’s global middleware stack. These middleware are listed in the stack by the AppHttpKernel
class. Because of this, you will often need to mark your «optional» request fields as nullable
if you do not want the validator to consider null
values as invalid. For example:
$request->validate([
'title' => 'required|unique:posts|max:255',
'body' => 'required',
'publish_at' => 'nullable|date',
]);
In this example, we are specifying that the publish_at
field may be either null
or a valid date representation. If the nullable
modifier is not added to the rule definition, the validator would consider null
an invalid date.
Validation Error Response Format
When your application throws a IlluminateValidationValidationException
exception and the incoming HTTP request is expecting a JSON response, Laravel will automatically format the error messages for you and return a 422 Unprocessable Entity
HTTP response.
Below, you can review an example of the JSON response format for validation errors. Note that nested error keys are flattened into «dot» notation format:
{
"message": "The team name must be a string. (and 4 more errors)",
"errors": {
"team_name": [
"The team name must be a string.",
"The team name must be at least 1 characters."
],
"authorization.role": [
"The selected authorization.role is invalid."
],
"users.0.email": [
"The users.0.email field is required."
],
"users.2.email": [
"The users.2.email must be a valid email address."
]
}
}
Form Request Validation
Creating Form Requests
For more complex validation scenarios, you may wish to create a «form request». Form requests are custom request classes that encapsulate their own validation and authorization logic. To create a form request class, you may use the make:request
Artisan CLI command:
php artisan make:request StorePostRequest
The generated form request class will be placed in the app/Http/Requests
directory. If this directory does not exist, it will be created when you run the make:request
command. Each form request generated by Laravel has two methods: authorize
and rules
.
As you might have guessed, the authorize
method is responsible for determining if the currently authenticated user can perform the action represented by the request, while the rules
method returns the validation rules that should apply to the request’s data:
/**
* Get the validation rules that apply to the request.
*
* @return array
*/
public function rules()
{
return [
'title' => 'required|unique:posts|max:255',
'body' => 'required',
];
}
Note
You may type-hint any dependencies you require within therules
method’s signature. They will automatically be resolved via the Laravel service container.
So, how are the validation rules evaluated? All you need to do is type-hint the request on your controller method. The incoming form request is validated before the controller method is called, meaning you do not need to clutter your controller with any validation logic:
/**
* Store a new blog post.
*
* @param AppHttpRequestsStorePostRequest $request
* @return IlluminateHttpResponse
*/
public function store(StorePostRequest $request)
{
// The incoming request is valid...
// Retrieve the validated input data...
$validated = $request->validated();
// Retrieve a portion of the validated input data...
$validated = $request->safe()->only(['name', 'email']);
$validated = $request->safe()->except(['name', 'email']);
}
If validation fails, a redirect response will be generated to send the user back to their previous location. The errors will also be flashed to the session so they are available for display. If the request was an XHR request, an HTTP response with a 422 status code will be returned to the user including a JSON representation of the validation errors.
Adding After Hooks To Form Requests
If you would like to add an «after» validation hook to a form request, you may use the withValidator
method. This method receives the fully constructed validator, allowing you to call any of its methods before the validation rules are actually evaluated:
/**
* Configure the validator instance.
*
* @param IlluminateValidationValidator $validator
* @return void
*/
public function withValidator($validator)
{
$validator->after(function ($validator) {
if ($this->somethingElseIsInvalid()) {
$validator->errors()->add('field', 'Something is wrong with this field!');
}
});
}
Stopping On First Validation Failure Attribute
By adding a stopOnFirstFailure
property to your request class, you may inform the validator that it should stop validating all attributes once a single validation failure has occurred:
/**
* Indicates if the validator should stop on the first rule failure.
*
* @var bool
*/
protected $stopOnFirstFailure = true;
Customizing The Redirect Location
As previously discussed, a redirect response will be generated to send the user back to their previous location when form request validation fails. However, you are free to customize this behavior. To do so, define a $redirect
property on your form request:
/**
* The URI that users should be redirected to if validation fails.
*
* @var string
*/
protected $redirect = '/dashboard';
Or, if you would like to redirect users to a named route, you may define a $redirectRoute
property instead:
/**
* The route that users should be redirected to if validation fails.
*
* @var string
*/
protected $redirectRoute = 'dashboard';
Authorizing Form Requests
The form request class also contains an authorize
method. Within this method, you may determine if the authenticated user actually has the authority to update a given resource. For example, you may determine if a user actually owns a blog comment they are attempting to update. Most likely, you will interact with your authorization gates and policies within this method:
use AppModelsComment;
/**
* Determine if the user is authorized to make this request.
*
* @return bool
*/
public function authorize()
{
$comment = Comment::find($this->route('comment'));
return $comment && $this->user()->can('update', $comment);
}
Since all form requests extend the base Laravel request class, we may use the user
method to access the currently authenticated user. Also, note the call to the route
method in the example above. This method grants you access to the URI parameters defined on the route being called, such as the {comment}
parameter in the example below:
Route::post('/comment/{comment}');
Therefore, if your application is taking advantage of route model binding, your code may be made even more succinct by accessing the resolved model as a property of the request:
return $this->user()->can('update', $this->comment);
If the authorize
method returns false
, an HTTP response with a 403 status code will automatically be returned and your controller method will not execute.
If you plan to handle authorization logic for the request in another part of your application, you may simply return true
from the authorize
method:
/**
* Determine if the user is authorized to make this request.
*
* @return bool
*/
public function authorize()
{
return true;
}
Note
You may type-hint any dependencies you need within theauthorize
method’s signature. They will automatically be resolved via the Laravel service container.
Customizing The Error Messages
You may customize the error messages used by the form request by overriding the messages
method. This method should return an array of attribute / rule pairs and their corresponding error messages:
/**
* Get the error messages for the defined validation rules.
*
* @return array
*/
public function messages()
{
return [
'title.required' => 'A title is required',
'body.required' => 'A message is required',
];
}
Customizing The Validation Attributes
Many of Laravel’s built-in validation rule error messages contain an :attribute
placeholder. If you would like the :attribute
placeholder of your validation message to be replaced with a custom attribute name, you may specify the custom names by overriding the attributes
method. This method should return an array of attribute / name pairs:
/**
* Get custom attributes for validator errors.
*
* @return array
*/
public function attributes()
{
return [
'email' => 'email address',
];
}
Preparing Input For Validation
If you need to prepare or sanitize any data from the request before you apply your validation rules, you may use the prepareForValidation
method:
use IlluminateSupportStr;
/**
* Prepare the data for validation.
*
* @return void
*/
protected function prepareForValidation()
{
$this->merge([
'slug' => Str::slug($this->slug),
]);
}
Likewise, if you need to normalize any request data after validation is complete, you may use the passedValidation
method:
use IlluminateSupportStr;
/**
* Handle a passed validation attempt.
*
* @return void
*/
protected function passedValidation()
{
$this->replace(['name' => 'Taylor']);
}
Manually Creating Validators
If you do not want to use the validate
method on the request, you may create a validator instance manually using the Validator
facade. The make
method on the facade generates a new validator instance:
<?php
namespace AppHttpControllers;
use AppHttpControllersController;
use IlluminateHttpRequest;
use IlluminateSupportFacadesValidator;
class PostController extends Controller
{
/**
* Store a new blog post.
*
* @param Request $request
* @return Response
*/
public function store(Request $request)
{
$validator = Validator::make($request->all(), [
'title' => 'required|unique:posts|max:255',
'body' => 'required',
]);
if ($validator->fails()) {
return redirect('post/create')
->withErrors($validator)
->withInput();
}
// Retrieve the validated input...
$validated = $validator->validated();
// Retrieve a portion of the validated input...
$validated = $validator->safe()->only(['name', 'email']);
$validated = $validator->safe()->except(['name', 'email']);
// Store the blog post...
}
}
The first argument passed to the make
method is the data under validation. The second argument is an array of the validation rules that should be applied to the data.
After determining whether the request validation failed, you may use the withErrors
method to flash the error messages to the session. When using this method, the $errors
variable will automatically be shared with your views after redirection, allowing you to easily display them back to the user. The withErrors
method accepts a validator, a MessageBag
, or a PHP array
.
Stopping On First Validation Failure
The stopOnFirstFailure
method will inform the validator that it should stop validating all attributes once a single validation failure has occurred:
if ($validator->stopOnFirstFailure()->fails()) {
// ...
}
Automatic Redirection
If you would like to create a validator instance manually but still take advantage of the automatic redirection offered by the HTTP request’s validate
method, you may call the validate
method on an existing validator instance. If validation fails, the user will automatically be redirected or, in the case of an XHR request, a JSON response will be returned:
Validator::make($request->all(), [
'title' => 'required|unique:posts|max:255',
'body' => 'required',
])->validate();
You may use the validateWithBag
method to store the error messages in a named error bag if validation fails:
Validator::make($request->all(), [
'title' => 'required|unique:posts|max:255',
'body' => 'required',
])->validateWithBag('post');
Named Error Bags
If you have multiple forms on a single page, you may wish to name the MessageBag
containing the validation errors, allowing you to retrieve the error messages for a specific form. To achieve this, pass a name as the second argument to withErrors
:
return redirect('register')->withErrors($validator, 'login');
You may then access the named MessageBag
instance from the $errors
variable:
{{ $errors->login->first('email') }}
Customizing The Error Messages
If needed, you may provide custom error messages that a validator instance should use instead of the default error messages provided by Laravel. There are several ways to specify custom messages. First, you may pass the custom messages as the third argument to the Validator::make
method:
$validator = Validator::make($input, $rules, $messages = [
'required' => 'The :attribute field is required.',
]);
In this example, the :attribute
placeholder will be replaced by the actual name of the field under validation. You may also utilize other placeholders in validation messages. For example:
$messages = [
'same' => 'The :attribute and :other must match.',
'size' => 'The :attribute must be exactly :size.',
'between' => 'The :attribute value :input is not between :min - :max.',
'in' => 'The :attribute must be one of the following types: :values',
];
Specifying A Custom Message For A Given Attribute
Sometimes you may wish to specify a custom error message only for a specific attribute. You may do so using «dot» notation. Specify the attribute’s name first, followed by the rule:
$messages = [
'email.required' => 'We need to know your email address!',
];
Specifying Custom Attribute Values
Many of Laravel’s built-in error messages include an :attribute
placeholder that is replaced with the name of the field or attribute under validation. To customize the values used to replace these placeholders for specific fields, you may pass an array of custom attributes as the fourth argument to the Validator::make
method:
$validator = Validator::make($input, $rules, $messages, [
'email' => 'email address',
]);
After Validation Hook
You may also attach callbacks to be run after validation is completed. This allows you to easily perform further validation and even add more error messages to the message collection. To get started, call the after
method on a validator instance:
$validator = Validator::make(/* ... */);
$validator->after(function ($validator) {
if ($this->somethingElseIsInvalid()) {
$validator->errors()->add(
'field', 'Something is wrong with this field!'
);
}
});
if ($validator->fails()) {
//
}
Working With Validated Input
After validating incoming request data using a form request or a manually created validator instance, you may wish to retrieve the incoming request data that actually underwent validation. This can be accomplished in several ways. First, you may call the validated
method on a form request or validator instance. This method returns an array of the data that was validated:
$validated = $request->validated();
$validated = $validator->validated();
Alternatively, you may call the safe
method on a form request or validator instance. This method returns an instance of IlluminateSupportValidatedInput
. This object exposes only
, except
, and all
methods to retrieve a subset of the validated data or the entire array of validated data:
$validated = $request->safe()->only(['name', 'email']);
$validated = $request->safe()->except(['name', 'email']);
$validated = $request->safe()->all();
In addition, the IlluminateSupportValidatedInput
instance may be iterated over and accessed like an array:
// Validated data may be iterated...
foreach ($request->safe() as $key => $value) {
//
}
// Validated data may be accessed as an array...
$validated = $request->safe();
$email = $validated['email'];
If you would like to add additional fields to the validated data, you may call the merge
method:
$validated = $request->safe()->merge(['name' => 'Taylor Otwell']);
If you would like to retrieve the validated data as a collection instance, you may call the collect
method:
$collection = $request->safe()->collect();
Working With Error Messages
After calling the errors
method on a Validator
instance, you will receive an IlluminateSupportMessageBag
instance, which has a variety of convenient methods for working with error messages. The $errors
variable that is automatically made available to all views is also an instance of the MessageBag
class.
Retrieving The First Error Message For A Field
To retrieve the first error message for a given field, use the first
method:
$errors = $validator->errors();
echo $errors->first('email');
Retrieving All Error Messages For A Field
If you need to retrieve an array of all the messages for a given field, use the get
method:
foreach ($errors->get('email') as $message) {
//
}
If you are validating an array form field, you may retrieve all of the messages for each of the array elements using the *
character:
foreach ($errors->get('attachments.*') as $message) {
//
}
Retrieving All Error Messages For All Fields
To retrieve an array of all messages for all fields, use the all
method:
foreach ($errors->all() as $message) {
//
}
Determining If Messages Exist For A Field
The has
method may be used to determine if any error messages exist for a given field:
if ($errors->has('email')) {
//
}
Specifying Custom Messages In Language Files
Laravel’s built-in validation rules each have an error message that is located in your application’s lang/en/validation.php
file. Within this file, you will find a translation entry for each validation rule. You are free to change or modify these messages based on the needs of your application.
In addition, you may copy this file to another translation language directory to translate the messages for your application’s language. To learn more about Laravel localization, check out the complete localization documentation.
Custom Messages For Specific Attributes
You may customize the error messages used for specified attribute and rule combinations within your application’s validation language files. To do so, add your message customizations to the custom
array of your application’s lang/xx/validation.php
language file:
'custom' => [
'email' => [
'required' => 'We need to know your email address!',
'max' => 'Your email address is too long!'
],
],
Specifying Attributes In Language Files
Many of Laravel’s built-in error messages include an :attribute
placeholder that is replaced with the name of the field or attribute under validation. If you would like the :attribute
portion of your validation message to be replaced with a custom value, you may specify the custom attribute name in the attributes
array of your lang/xx/validation.php
language file:
'attributes' => [
'email' => 'email address',
],
Specifying Values In Language Files
Some of Laravel’s built-in validation rule error messages contain a :value
placeholder that is replaced with the current value of the request attribute. However, you may occasionally need the :value
portion of your validation message to be replaced with a custom representation of the value. For example, consider the following rule that specifies that a credit card number is required if the payment_type
has a value of cc
:
Validator::make($request->all(), [
'credit_card_number' => 'required_if:payment_type,cc'
]);
If this validation rule fails, it will produce the following error message:
The credit card number field is required when payment type is cc.
Instead of displaying cc
as the payment type value, you may specify a more user-friendly value representation in your lang/xx/validation.php
language file by defining a values
array:
'values' => [
'payment_type' => [
'cc' => 'credit card'
],
],
After defining this value, the validation rule will produce the following error message:
The credit card number field is required when payment type is credit card.
Available Validation Rules
Below is a list of all available validation rules and their function:
accepted
The field under validation must be "yes"
, "on"
, 1
, or true
. This is useful for validating «Terms of Service» acceptance or similar fields.
accepted_if:anotherfield,value,…
The field under validation must be "yes"
, "on"
, 1
, or true
if another field under validation is equal to a specified value. This is useful for validating «Terms of Service» acceptance or similar fields.
active_url
The field under validation must have a valid A or AAAA record according to the dns_get_record
PHP function. The hostname of the provided URL is extracted using the parse_url
PHP function before being passed to dns_get_record
.
after:date
The field under validation must be a value after a given date. The dates will be passed into the strtotime
PHP function in order to be converted to a valid DateTime
instance:
'start_date' => 'required|date|after:tomorrow'
Instead of passing a date string to be evaluated by strtotime
, you may specify another field to compare against the date:
'finish_date' => 'required|date|after:start_date'
after_or_equal:date
The field under validation must be a value after or equal to the given date. For more information, see the after rule.
alpha
The field under validation must be entirely Unicode alphabetic characters contained in p{L}
and p{M}
.
To restrict this validation rule to characters in the ASCII range (a-z
and A-Z
), you may provide the ascii
option to the validation rule:
'username' => 'alpha:ascii',
alpha_dash
The field under validation must be entirely Unicode alpha-numeric characters contained in p{L}
, p{M}
, p{N}
, as well as ASCII dashes (-
) and ASCII underscores (_
).
To restrict this validation rule to characters in the ASCII range (a-z
and A-Z
), you may provide the ascii
option to the validation rule:
'username' => 'alpha_dash:ascii',
alpha_num
The field under validation must be entirely Unicode alpha-numeric characters contained in p{L}
, p{M}
, and p{N}
.
To restrict this validation rule to characters in the ASCII range (a-z
and A-Z
), you may provide the ascii
option to the validation rule:
'username' => 'alpha_num:ascii',
array
The field under validation must be a PHP array
.
When additional values are provided to the array
rule, each key in the input array must be present within the list of values provided to the rule. In the following example, the admin
key in the input array is invalid since it is not contained in the list of values provided to the array
rule:
use IlluminateSupportFacadesValidator;
$input = [
'user' => [
'name' => 'Taylor Otwell',
'username' => 'taylorotwell',
'admin' => true,
],
];
Validator::make($input, [
'user' => 'array:name,username',
]);
In general, you should always specify the array keys that are allowed to be present within your array.
ascii
The field under validation must be entirely 7-bit ASCII characters.
bail
Stop running validation rules for the field after the first validation failure.
While the bail
rule will only stop validating a specific field when it encounters a validation failure, the stopOnFirstFailure
method will inform the validator that it should stop validating all attributes once a single validation failure has occurred:
if ($validator->stopOnFirstFailure()->fails()) {
// ...
}
before:date
The field under validation must be a value preceding the given date. The dates will be passed into the PHP strtotime
function in order to be converted into a valid DateTime
instance. In addition, like the after
rule, the name of another field under validation may be supplied as the value of date
.
before_or_equal:date
The field under validation must be a value preceding or equal to the given date. The dates will be passed into the PHP strtotime
function in order to be converted into a valid DateTime
instance. In addition, like the after
rule, the name of another field under validation may be supplied as the value of date
.
between:min,max
The field under validation must have a size between the given min and max (inclusive). Strings, numerics, arrays, and files are evaluated in the same fashion as the size
rule.
boolean
The field under validation must be able to be cast as a boolean. Accepted input are true
, false
, 1
, 0
, "1"
, and "0"
.
confirmed
The field under validation must have a matching field of {field}_confirmation
. For example, if the field under validation is password
, a matching password_confirmation
field must be present in the input.
current_password
The field under validation must match the authenticated user’s password. You may specify an authentication guard using the rule’s first parameter:
'password' => 'current_password:api'
date
The field under validation must be a valid, non-relative date according to the strtotime
PHP function.
date_equals:date
The field under validation must be equal to the given date. The dates will be passed into the PHP strtotime
function in order to be converted into a valid DateTime
instance.
date_format:format,…
The field under validation must match one of the given formats. You should use either date
or date_format
when validating a field, not both. This validation rule supports all formats supported by PHP’s DateTime class.
decimal:min,max
The field under validation must be numeric and must contain the specified number of decimal places:
// Must have exactly two decimal places (9.99)...
'price' => 'decimal:2'
// Must have between 2 and 4 decimal places...
'price' => 'decimal:2,4'
declined
The field under validation must be "no"
, "off"
, 0
, or false
.
declined_if:anotherfield,value,…
The field under validation must be "no"
, "off"
, 0
, or false
if another field under validation is equal to a specified value.
different:field
The field under validation must have a different value than field.
digits:value
The integer under validation must have an exact length of value.
digits_between:min,max
The integer validation must have a length between the given min and max.
dimensions
The file under validation must be an image meeting the dimension constraints as specified by the rule’s parameters:
'avatar' => 'dimensions:min_width=100,min_height=200'
Available constraints are: min_width, max_width, min_height, max_height, width, height, ratio.
A ratio constraint should be represented as width divided by height. This can be specified either by a fraction like 3/2
or a float like 1.5
:
'avatar' => 'dimensions:ratio=3/2'
Since this rule requires several arguments, you may use the Rule::dimensions
method to fluently construct the rule:
use IlluminateSupportFacadesValidator;
use IlluminateValidationRule;
Validator::make($data, [
'avatar' => [
'required',
Rule::dimensions()->maxWidth(1000)->maxHeight(500)->ratio(3 / 2),
],
]);
distinct
When validating arrays, the field under validation must not have any duplicate values:
'foo.*.id' => 'distinct'
Distinct uses loose variable comparisons by default. To use strict comparisons, you may add the strict
parameter to your validation rule definition:
'foo.*.id' => 'distinct:strict'
You may add ignore_case
to the validation rule’s arguments to make the rule ignore capitalization differences:
'foo.*.id' => 'distinct:ignore_case'
doesnt_start_with:foo,bar,…
The field under validation must not start with one of the given values.
doesnt_end_with:foo,bar,…
The field under validation must not end with one of the given values.
The field under validation must be formatted as an email address. This validation rule utilizes the egulias/email-validator
package for validating the email address. By default, the RFCValidation
validator is applied, but you can apply other validation styles as well:
'email' => 'email:rfc,dns'
The example above will apply the RFCValidation
and DNSCheckValidation
validations. Here’s a full list of validation styles you can apply:
-
rfc
:RFCValidation
-
strict
:NoRFCWarningsValidation
-
dns
:DNSCheckValidation
-
spoof
:SpoofCheckValidation
-
filter
:FilterEmailValidation
-
filter_unicode
:FilterEmailValidation::unicode()
The filter
validator, which uses PHP’s filter_var
function, ships with Laravel and was Laravel’s default email validation behavior prior to Laravel version 5.8.
Warning
Thedns
andspoof
validators require the PHPintl
extension.
ends_with:foo,bar,…
The field under validation must end with one of the given values.
enum
The Enum
rule is a class based rule that validates whether the field under validation contains a valid enum value. The Enum
rule accepts the name of the enum as its only constructor argument:
use AppEnumsServerStatus;
use IlluminateValidationRulesEnum;
$request->validate([
'status' => [new Enum(ServerStatus::class)],
]);
Warning
Enums are only available on PHP 8.1+.
exclude
The field under validation will be excluded from the request data returned by the validate
and validated
methods.
exclude_if:anotherfield,value
The field under validation will be excluded from the request data returned by the validate
and validated
methods if the anotherfield field is equal to value.
If complex conditional exclusion logic is required, you may utilize the Rule::excludeIf
method. This method accepts a boolean or a closure. When given a closure, the closure should return true
or false
to indicate if the field under validation should be excluded:
use IlluminateSupportFacadesValidator;
use IlluminateValidationRule;
Validator::make($request->all(), [
'role_id' => Rule::excludeIf($request->user()->is_admin),
]);
Validator::make($request->all(), [
'role_id' => Rule::excludeIf(fn () => $request->user()->is_admin),
]);
exclude_unless:anotherfield,value
The field under validation will be excluded from the request data returned by the validate
and validated
methods unless anotherfield‘s field is equal to value. If value is null
(exclude_unless:name,null
), the field under validation will be excluded unless the comparison field is null
or the comparison field is missing from the request data.
exclude_with:anotherfield
The field under validation will be excluded from the request data returned by the validate
and validated
methods if the anotherfield field is present.
exclude_without:anotherfield
The field under validation will be excluded from the request data returned by the validate
and validated
methods if the anotherfield field is not present.
exists:table,column
The field under validation must exist in a given database table.
Basic Usage Of Exists Rule
'state' => 'exists:states'
If the column
option is not specified, the field name will be used. So, in this case, the rule will validate that the states
database table contains a record with a state
column value matching the request’s state
attribute value.
Specifying A Custom Column Name
You may explicitly specify the database column name that should be used by the validation rule by placing it after the database table name:
'state' => 'exists:states,abbreviation'
Occasionally, you may need to specify a specific database connection to be used for the exists
query. You can accomplish this by prepending the connection name to the table name:
'email' => 'exists:connection.staff,email'
Instead of specifying the table name directly, you may specify the Eloquent model which should be used to determine the table name:
'user_id' => 'exists:AppModelsUser,id'
If you would like to customize the query executed by the validation rule, you may use the Rule
class to fluently define the rule. In this example, we’ll also specify the validation rules as an array instead of using the |
character to delimit them:
use IlluminateSupportFacadesValidator;
use IlluminateValidationRule;
Validator::make($data, [
'email' => [
'required',
Rule::exists('staff')->where(function ($query) {
return $query->where('account_id', 1);
}),
],
]);
You may explicitly specify the database column name that should be used by the exists
rule generated by the Rule::exists
method by providing the column name as the second argument to the exists
method:
'state' => Rule::exists('states', 'abbreviation'),
file
The field under validation must be a successfully uploaded file.
filled
The field under validation must not be empty when it is present.
gt:field
The field under validation must be greater than the given field. The two fields must be of the same type. Strings, numerics, arrays, and files are evaluated using the same conventions as the size
rule.
gte:field
The field under validation must be greater than or equal to the given field. The two fields must be of the same type. Strings, numerics, arrays, and files are evaluated using the same conventions as the size
rule.
image
The file under validation must be an image (jpg, jpeg, png, bmp, gif, svg, or webp).
in:foo,bar,…
The field under validation must be included in the given list of values. Since this rule often requires you to implode
an array, the Rule::in
method may be used to fluently construct the rule:
use IlluminateSupportFacadesValidator;
use IlluminateValidationRule;
Validator::make($data, [
'zones' => [
'required',
Rule::in(['first-zone', 'second-zone']),
],
]);
When the in
rule is combined with the array
rule, each value in the input array must be present within the list of values provided to the in
rule. In the following example, the LAS
airport code in the input array is invalid since it is not contained in the list of airports provided to the in
rule:
use IlluminateSupportFacadesValidator;
use IlluminateValidationRule;
$input = [
'airports' => ['NYC', 'LAS'],
];
Validator::make($input, [
'airports' => [
'required',
'array',
],
'airports.*' => Rule::in(['NYC', 'LIT']),
]);
in_array:anotherfield.*
The field under validation must exist in anotherfield‘s values.
integer
The field under validation must be an integer.
Warning
This validation rule does not verify that the input is of the «integer» variable type, only that the input is of a type accepted by PHP’sFILTER_VALIDATE_INT
rule. If you need to validate the input as being a number please use this rule in combination with thenumeric
validation rule.
ip
The field under validation must be an IP address.
ipv4
The field under validation must be an IPv4 address.
ipv6
The field under validation must be an IPv6 address.
json
The field under validation must be a valid JSON string.
lt:field
The field under validation must be less than the given field. The two fields must be of the same type. Strings, numerics, arrays, and files are evaluated using the same conventions as the size
rule.
lte:field
The field under validation must be less than or equal to the given field. The two fields must be of the same type. Strings, numerics, arrays, and files are evaluated using the same conventions as the size
rule.
lowercase
The field under validation must be lowercase.
mac_address
The field under validation must be a MAC address.
max:value
The field under validation must be less than or equal to a maximum value. Strings, numerics, arrays, and files are evaluated in the same fashion as the size
rule.
max_digits:value
The integer under validation must have a maximum length of value.
mimetypes:text/plain,…
The file under validation must match one of the given MIME types:
'video' => 'mimetypes:video/avi,video/mpeg,video/quicktime'
To determine the MIME type of the uploaded file, the file’s contents will be read and the framework will attempt to guess the MIME type, which may be different from the client’s provided MIME type.
mimes:foo,bar,…
The file under validation must have a MIME type corresponding to one of the listed extensions.
Basic Usage Of MIME Rule
'photo' => 'mimes:jpg,bmp,png'
Even though you only need to specify the extensions, this rule actually validates the MIME type of the file by reading the file’s contents and guessing its MIME type. A full listing of MIME types and their corresponding extensions may be found at the following location:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/conf/mime.types
min:value
The field under validation must have a minimum value. Strings, numerics, arrays, and files are evaluated in the same fashion as the size
rule.
min_digits:value
The integer under validation must have a minimum length of value.
multiple_of:value
The field under validation must be a multiple of value.
missing
The field under validation must not be present in the input data.
missing_if:anotherfield,value,…
The field under validation must not be present if the anotherfield field is equal to any value.
missing_unless:anotherfield,value
The field under validation must not be present unless the anotherfield field is equal to any value.
missing_with:foo,bar,…
The field under validation must not be present only if any of the other specified fields are present.
missing_with_all:foo,bar,…
The field under validation must not be present only if all of the other specified fields are present.
not_in:foo,bar,…
The field under validation must not be included in the given list of values. The Rule::notIn
method may be used to fluently construct the rule:
use IlluminateValidationRule;
Validator::make($data, [
'toppings' => [
'required',
Rule::notIn(['sprinkles', 'cherries']),
],
]);
not_regex:pattern
The field under validation must not match the given regular expression.
Internally, this rule uses the PHP preg_match
function. The pattern specified should obey the same formatting required by preg_match
and thus also include valid delimiters. For example: 'email' => 'not_regex:/^.+$/i'
.
Warning
When using theregex
/not_regex
patterns, it may be necessary to specify your validation rules using an array instead of using|
delimiters, especially if the regular expression contains a|
character.
nullable
The field under validation may be null
.
numeric
The field under validation must be numeric.
password
The field under validation must match the authenticated user’s password.
Warning
This rule was renamed tocurrent_password
with the intention of removing it in Laravel 9. Please use the Current Password rule instead.
present
The field under validation must exist in the input data.
prohibited
The field under validation must be missing or empty. A field is «empty» if it meets one of the following criteria:
- The value is
null
. - The value is an empty string.
- The value is an empty array or empty
Countable
object. - The value is an uploaded file with an empty path.
prohibited_if:anotherfield,value,…
The field under validation must be missing or empty if the anotherfield field is equal to any value. A field is «empty» if it meets one of the following criteria:
- The value is
null
. - The value is an empty string.
- The value is an empty array or empty
Countable
object. - The value is an uploaded file with an empty path.
If complex conditional prohibition logic is required, you may utilize the Rule::prohibitedIf
method. This method accepts a boolean or a closure. When given a closure, the closure should return true
or false
to indicate if the field under validation should be prohibited:
use IlluminateSupportFacadesValidator;
use IlluminateValidationRule;
Validator::make($request->all(), [
'role_id' => Rule::prohibitedIf($request->user()->is_admin),
]);
Validator::make($request->all(), [
'role_id' => Rule::prohibitedIf(fn () => $request->user()->is_admin),
]);
prohibited_unless:anotherfield,value,…
The field under validation must be missing or empty unless the anotherfield field is equal to any value. A field is «empty» if it meets one of the following criteria:
- The value is
null
. - The value is an empty string.
- The value is an empty array or empty
Countable
object. - The value is an uploaded file with an empty path.
prohibits:anotherfield,…
If the field under validation is not missing or empty, all fields in anotherfield must be missing or empty. A field is «empty» if it meets one of the following criteria:
- The value is
null
. - The value is an empty string.
- The value is an empty array or empty
Countable
object. - The value is an uploaded file with an empty path.
regex:pattern
The field under validation must match the given regular expression.
Internally, this rule uses the PHP preg_match
function. The pattern specified should obey the same formatting required by preg_match
and thus also include valid delimiters. For example: 'email' => 'regex:/^[email protected]+$/i'
.
Warning
When using theregex
/not_regex
patterns, it may be necessary to specify rules in an array instead of using|
delimiters, especially if the regular expression contains a|
character.
required
The field under validation must be present in the input data and not empty. A field is «empty» if it meets one of the following criteria:
- The value is
null
. - The value is an empty string.
- The value is an empty array or empty
Countable
object. - The value is an uploaded file with no path.
required_if:anotherfield,value,…
The field under validation must be present and not empty if the anotherfield field is equal to any value.
If you would like to construct a more complex condition for the required_if
rule, you may use the Rule::requiredIf
method. This method accepts a boolean or a closure. When passed a closure, the closure should return true
or false
to indicate if the field under validation is required:
use IlluminateSupportFacadesValidator;
use IlluminateValidationRule;
Validator::make($request->all(), [
'role_id' => Rule::requiredIf($request->user()->is_admin),
]);
Validator::make($request->all(), [
'role_id' => Rule::requiredIf(fn () => $request->user()->is_admin),
]);
required_unless:anotherfield,value,…
The field under validation must be present and not empty unless the anotherfield field is equal to any value. This also means anotherfield must be present in the request data unless value is null
. If value is null
(required_unless:name,null
), the field under validation will be required unless the comparison field is null
or the comparison field is missing from the request data.
required_with:foo,bar,…
The field under validation must be present and not empty only if any of the other specified fields are present and not empty.
required_with_all:foo,bar,…
The field under validation must be present and not empty only if all of the other specified fields are present and not empty.
required_without:foo,bar,…
The field under validation must be present and not empty only when any of the other specified fields are empty or not present.
required_without_all:foo,bar,…
The field under validation must be present and not empty only when all of the other specified fields are empty or not present.
required_array_keys:foo,bar,…
The field under validation must be an array and must contain at least the specified keys.
same:field
The given field must match the field under validation.
size:value
The field under validation must have a size matching the given value. For string data, value corresponds to the number of characters. For numeric data, value corresponds to a given integer value (the attribute must also have the numeric
or integer
rule). For an array, size corresponds to the count
of the array. For files, size corresponds to the file size in kilobytes. Let’s look at some examples:
// Validate that a string is exactly 12 characters long...
'title' => 'size:12';
// Validate that a provided integer equals 10...
'seats' => 'integer|size:10';
// Validate that an array has exactly 5 elements...
'tags' => 'array|size:5';
// Validate that an uploaded file is exactly 512 kilobytes...
'image' => 'file|size:512';
starts_with:foo,bar,…
The field under validation must start with one of the given values.
string
The field under validation must be a string. If you would like to allow the field to also be null
, you should assign the nullable
rule to the field.
timezone
The field under validation must be a valid timezone identifier according to the timezone_identifiers_list
PHP function.
unique:table,column
The field under validation must not exist within the given database table.
Specifying A Custom Table / Column Name:
Instead of specifying the table name directly, you may specify the Eloquent model which should be used to determine the table name:
'email' => 'unique:AppModelsUser,email_address'
The column
option may be used to specify the field’s corresponding database column. If the column
option is not specified, the name of the field under validation will be used.
'email' => 'unique:users,email_address'
Specifying A Custom Database Connection
Occasionally, you may need to set a custom connection for database queries made by the Validator. To accomplish this, you may prepend the connection name to the table name:
'email' => 'unique:connection.users,email_address'
Forcing A Unique Rule To Ignore A Given ID:
Sometimes, you may wish to ignore a given ID during unique validation. For example, consider an «update profile» screen that includes the user’s name, email address, and location. You will probably want to verify that the email address is unique. However, if the user only changes the name field and not the email field, you do not want a validation error to be thrown because the user is already the owner of the email address in question.
To instruct the validator to ignore the user’s ID, we’ll use the Rule
class to fluently define the rule. In this example, we’ll also specify the validation rules as an array instead of using the |
character to delimit the rules:
use IlluminateSupportFacadesValidator;
use IlluminateValidationRule;
Validator::make($data, [
'email' => [
'required',
Rule::unique('users')->ignore($user->id),
],
]);
Warning
You should never pass any user controlled request input into theignore
method. Instead, you should only pass a system generated unique ID such as an auto-incrementing ID or UUID from an Eloquent model instance. Otherwise, your application will be vulnerable to an SQL injection attack.
Instead of passing the model key’s value to the ignore
method, you may also pass the entire model instance. Laravel will automatically extract the key from the model:
Rule::unique('users')->ignore($user)
If your table uses a primary key column name other than id
, you may specify the name of the column when calling the ignore
method:
Rule::unique('users')->ignore($user->id, 'user_id')
By default, the unique
rule will check the uniqueness of the column matching the name of the attribute being validated. However, you may pass a different column name as the second argument to the unique
method:
Rule::unique('users', 'email_address')->ignore($user->id),
Adding Additional Where Clauses:
You may specify additional query conditions by customizing the query using the where
method. For example, let’s add a query condition that scopes the query to only search records that have an account_id
column value of 1
:
'email' => Rule::unique('users')->where(fn ($query) => $query->where('account_id', 1))
uppercase
The field under validation must be uppercase.
url
The field under validation must be a valid URL.
ulid
The field under validation must be a valid Universally Unique Lexicographically Sortable Identifier (ULID).
uuid
The field under validation must be a valid RFC 4122 (version 1, 3, 4, or 5) universally unique identifier (UUID).
Conditionally Adding Rules
Skipping Validation When Fields Have Certain Values
You may occasionally wish to not validate a given field if another field has a given value. You may accomplish this using the exclude_if
validation rule. In this example, the appointment_date
and doctor_name
fields will not be validated if the has_appointment
field has a value of false
:
use IlluminateSupportFacadesValidator;
$validator = Validator::make($data, [
'has_appointment' => 'required|boolean',
'appointment_date' => 'exclude_if:has_appointment,false|required|date',
'doctor_name' => 'exclude_if:has_appointment,false|required|string',
]);
Alternatively, you may use the exclude_unless
rule to not validate a given field unless another field has a given value:
$validator = Validator::make($data, [
'has_appointment' => 'required|boolean',
'appointment_date' => 'exclude_unless:has_appointment,true|required|date',
'doctor_name' => 'exclude_unless:has_appointment,true|required|string',
]);
Validating When Present
In some situations, you may wish to run validation checks against a field only if that field is present in the data being validated. To quickly accomplish this, add the sometimes
rule to your rule list:
$v = Validator::make($data, [
'email' => 'sometimes|required|email',
]);
In the example above, the email
field will only be validated if it is present in the $data
array.
Note
If you are attempting to validate a field that should always be present but may be empty, check out this note on optional fields.
Complex Conditional Validation
Sometimes you may wish to add validation rules based on more complex conditional logic. For example, you may wish to require a given field only if another field has a greater value than 100. Or, you may need two fields to have a given value only when another field is present. Adding these validation rules doesn’t have to be a pain. First, create a Validator
instance with your static rules that never change:
use IlluminateSupportFacadesValidator;
$validator = Validator::make($request->all(), [
'email' => 'required|email',
'games' => 'required|numeric',
]);
Let’s assume our web application is for game collectors. If a game collector registers with our application and they own more than 100 games, we want them to explain why they own so many games. For example, perhaps they run a game resale shop, or maybe they just enjoy collecting games. To conditionally add this requirement, we can use the sometimes
method on the Validator
instance.
$validator->sometimes('reason', 'required|max:500', function ($input) {
return $input->games >= 100;
});
The first argument passed to the sometimes
method is the name of the field we are conditionally validating. The second argument is a list of the rules we want to add. If the closure passed as the third argument returns true
, the rules will be added. This method makes it a breeze to build complex conditional validations. You may even add conditional validations for several fields at once:
$validator->sometimes(['reason', 'cost'], 'required', function ($input) {
return $input->games >= 100;
});
Note
The$input
parameter passed to your closure will be an instance ofIlluminateSupportFluent
and may be used to access your input and files under validation.
Complex Conditional Array Validation
Sometimes you may want to validate a field based on another field in the same nested array whose index you do not know. In these situations, you may allow your closure to receive a second argument which will be the current individual item in the array being validated:
$input = [
'channels' => [
[
'type' => 'email',
'address' => '[email protected]',
],
[
'type' => 'url',
'address' => 'https://example.com',
],
],
];
$validator->sometimes('channels.*.address', 'email', function ($input, $item) {
return $item->type === 'email';
});
$validator->sometimes('channels.*.address', 'url', function ($input, $item) {
return $item->type !== 'email';
});
Like the $input
parameter passed to the closure, the $item
parameter is an instance of IlluminateSupportFluent
when the attribute data is an array; otherwise, it is a string.
Validating Arrays
As discussed in the array
validation rule documentation, the array
rule accepts a list of allowed array keys. If any additional keys are present within the array, validation will fail:
use IlluminateSupportFacadesValidator;
$input = [
'user' => [
'name' => 'Taylor Otwell',
'username' => 'taylorotwell',
'admin' => true,
],
];
Validator::make($input, [
'user' => 'array:username,locale',
]);
In general, you should always specify the array keys that are allowed to be present within your array. Otherwise, the validator’s validate
and validated
methods will return all of the validated data, including the array and all of its keys, even if those keys were not validated by other nested array validation rules.
Validating Nested Array Input
Validating nested array based form input fields doesn’t have to be a pain. You may use «dot notation» to validate attributes within an array. For example, if the incoming HTTP request contains a photos[profile]
field, you may validate it like so:
use IlluminateSupportFacadesValidator;
$validator = Validator::make($request->all(), [
'photos.profile' => 'required|image',
]);
You may also validate each element of an array. For example, to validate that each email in a given array input field is unique, you may do the following:
$validator = Validator::make($request->all(), [
'person.*.email' => 'email|unique:users',
'person.*.first_name' => 'required_with:person.*.last_name',
]);
Likewise, you may use the *
character when specifying custom validation messages in your language files, making it a breeze to use a single validation message for array based fields:
'custom' => [
'person.*.email' => [
'unique' => 'Each person must have a unique email address',
]
],
Accessing Nested Array Data
Sometimes you may need to access the value for a given nested array element when assigning validation rules to the attribute. You may accomplish this using the Rule::forEach
method. The forEach
method accepts a closure that will be invoked for each iteration of the array attribute under validation and will receive the attribute’s value and explicit, fully-expanded attribute name. The closure should return an array of rules to assign to the array element:
use AppRulesHasPermission;
use IlluminateSupportFacadesValidator;
use IlluminateValidationRule;
$validator = Validator::make($request->all(), [
'companies.*.id' => Rule::forEach(function ($value, $attribute) {
return [
Rule::exists(Company::class, 'id'),
new HasPermission('manage-company', $value),
];
}),
]);
Error Message Indexes & Positions
When validating arrays, you may want to reference the index or position of a particular item that failed validation within the error message displayed by your application. To accomplish this, you may include the :index
(starts from 0
) and :position
(starts from 1
) placeholders within your custom validation message:
use IlluminateSupportFacadesValidator;
$input = [
'photos' => [
[
'name' => 'BeachVacation.jpg',
'description' => 'A photo of my beach vacation!',
],
[
'name' => 'GrandCanyon.jpg',
'description' => '',
],
],
];
Validator::validate($input, [
'photos.*.description' => 'required',
], [
'photos.*.description.required' => 'Please describe photo #:position.',
]);
Given the example above, validation will fail and the user will be presented with the following error of «Please describe photo #2.»
Validating Files
Laravel provides a variety of validation rules that may be used to validate uploaded files, such as mimes
, image
, min
, and max
. While you are free to specify these rules individually when validating files, Laravel also offers a fluent file validation rule builder that you may find convenient:
use IlluminateSupportFacadesValidator;
use IlluminateValidationRulesFile;
Validator::validate($input, [
'attachment' => [
'required',
File::types(['mp3', 'wav'])
->min(1024)
->max(12 * 1024),
],
]);
If your application accepts images uploaded by your users, you may use the File
rule’s image
constructor method to indicate that the uploaded file should be an image. In addition, the dimensions
rule may be used to limit the dimensions of the image:
use IlluminateSupportFacadesValidator;
use IlluminateValidationRulesFile;
Validator::validate($input, [
'photo' => [
'required',
File::image()
->min(1024)
->max(12 * 1024)
->dimensions(Rule::dimensions()->maxWidth(1000)->maxHeight(500)),
],
]);
Note
More information regarding validating image dimensions may be found in the dimension rule documentation.
File Types
Even though you only need to specify the extensions when invoking the types
method, this method actually validates the MIME type of the file by reading the file’s contents and guessing its MIME type. A full listing of MIME types and their corresponding extensions may be found at the following location:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/conf/mime.types
Validating Passwords
To ensure that passwords have an adequate level of complexity, you may use Laravel’s Password
rule object:
use IlluminateSupportFacadesValidator;
use IlluminateValidationRulesPassword;
$validator = Validator::make($request->all(), [
'password' => ['required', 'confirmed', Password::min(8)],
]);
The Password
rule object allows you to easily customize the password complexity requirements for your application, such as specifying that passwords require at least one letter, number, symbol, or characters with mixed casing:
// Require at least 8 characters...
Password::min(8)
// Require at least one letter...
Password::min(8)->letters()
// Require at least one uppercase and one lowercase letter...
Password::min(8)->mixedCase()
// Require at least one number...
Password::min(8)->numbers()
// Require at least one symbol...
Password::min(8)->symbols()
In addition, you may ensure that a password has not been compromised in a public password data breach leak using the uncompromised
method:
Password::min(8)->uncompromised()
Internally, the Password
rule object uses the k-Anonymity model to determine if a password has been leaked via the haveibeenpwned.com service without sacrificing the user’s privacy or security.
By default, if a password appears at least once in a data leak, it will be considered compromised. You can customize this threshold using the first argument of the uncompromised
method:
// Ensure the password appears less than 3 times in the same data leak...
Password::min(8)->uncompromised(3);
Of course, you may chain all the methods in the examples above:
Password::min(8)
->letters()
->mixedCase()
->numbers()
->symbols()
->uncompromised()
Defining Default Password Rules
You may find it convenient to specify the default validation rules for passwords in a single location of your application. You can easily accomplish this using the Password::defaults
method, which accepts a closure. The closure given to the defaults
method should return the default configuration of the Password rule. Typically, the defaults
rule should be called within the boot
method of one of your application’s service providers:
use IlluminateValidationRulesPassword;
/**
* Bootstrap any application services.
*
* @return void
*/
public function boot()
{
Password::defaults(function () {
$rule = Password::min(8);
return $this->app->isProduction()
? $rule->mixedCase()->uncompromised()
: $rule;
});
}
Then, when you would like to apply the default rules to a particular password undergoing validation, you may invoke the defaults
method with no arguments:
'password' => ['required', Password::defaults()],
Occasionally, you may want to attach additional validation rules to your default password validation rules. You may use the rules
method to accomplish this:
use AppRulesZxcvbnRule;
Password::defaults(function () {
$rule = Password::min(8)->rules([new ZxcvbnRule]);
// ...
});
Custom Validation Rules
Using Rule Objects
Laravel provides a variety of helpful validation rules; however, you may wish to specify some of your own. One method of registering custom validation rules is using rule objects. To generate a new rule object, you may use the make:rule
Artisan command. Let’s use this command to generate a rule that verifies a string is uppercase. Laravel will place the new rule in the app/Rules
directory. If this directory does not exist, Laravel will create it when you execute the Artisan command to create your rule:
php artisan make:rule Uppercase --invokable
Once the rule has been created, we are ready to define its behavior. A rule object contains a single method: __invoke
. This method receives the attribute name, its value, and a callback that should be invoked on failure with the validation error message:
<?php
namespace AppRules;
use IlluminateContractsValidationInvokableRule;
class Uppercase implements InvokableRule
{
/**
* Run the validation rule.
*
* @param string $attribute
* @param mixed $value
* @param Closure $fail
* @return void
*/
public function __invoke($attribute, $value, $fail)
{
if (strtoupper($value) !== $value) {
$fail('The :attribute must be uppercase.');
}
}
}
Once the rule has been defined, you may attach it to a validator by passing an instance of the rule object with your other validation rules:
use AppRulesUppercase;
$request->validate([
'name' => ['required', 'string', new Uppercase],
]);
Translating Validation Messages
Instead of providing a literal error message to the $fail
closure, you may also provide a translation string key and instruct Laravel to translate the error message:
if (strtoupper($value) !== $value) {
$fail('validation.uppercase')->translate();
}
If necessary, you may provide placeholder replacements and the preferred language as the first and second arguments to the translate
method:
$fail('validation.location')->translate([
'value' => $this->value,
], 'fr')
Accessing Additional Data
If your custom validation rule class needs to access all of the other data undergoing validation, your rule class may implement the IlluminateContractsValidationDataAwareRule
interface. This interface requires your class to define a setData
method. This method will automatically be invoked by Laravel (before validation proceeds) with all of the data under validation:
<?php
namespace AppRules;
use IlluminateContractsValidationDataAwareRule;
use IlluminateContractsValidationInvokableRule;
class Uppercase implements DataAwareRule, InvokableRule
{
/**
* All of the data under validation.
*
* @var array
*/
protected $data = [];
// ...
/**
* Set the data under validation.
*
* @param array $data
* @return $this
*/
public function setData($data)
{
$this->data = $data;
return $this;
}
}
Or, if your validation rule requires access to the validator instance performing the validation, you may implement the ValidatorAwareRule
interface:
<?php
namespace AppRules;
use IlluminateContractsValidationInvokableRule;
use IlluminateContractsValidationValidatorAwareRule;
class Uppercase implements InvokableRule, ValidatorAwareRule
{
/**
* The validator instance.
*
* @var IlluminateValidationValidator
*/
protected $validator;
// ...
/**
* Set the current validator.
*
* @param IlluminateValidationValidator $validator
* @return $this
*/
public function setValidator($validator)
{
$this->validator = $validator;
return $this;
}
}
Using Closures
If you only need the functionality of a custom rule once throughout your application, you may use a closure instead of a rule object. The closure receives the attribute’s name, the attribute’s value, and a $fail
callback that should be called if validation fails:
use IlluminateSupportFacadesValidator;
$validator = Validator::make($request->all(), [
'title' => [
'required',
'max:255',
function ($attribute, $value, $fail) {
if ($value === 'foo') {
$fail('The '.$attribute.' is invalid.');
}
},
],
]);
Implicit Rules
By default, when an attribute being validated is not present or contains an empty string, normal validation rules, including custom rules, are not run. For example, the unique
rule will not be run against an empty string:
use IlluminateSupportFacadesValidator;
$rules = ['name' => 'unique:users,name'];
$input = ['name' => ''];
Validator::make($input, $rules)->passes(); // true
For a custom rule to run even when an attribute is empty, the rule must imply that the attribute is required. To quickly generate a new implicit rule object, you may use the make:rule
Artisan command with the --implicit
option:
php artisan make:rule Uppercase --invokable --implicit
Warning
An «implicit» rule only implies that the attribute is required. Whether it actually invalidates a missing or empty attribute is up to you.
In many projects error handling and validation is distributed across business logic, API controllers, data access layer in the form of conditions (“if-else” sequences). This leads to the violation of the Separation of Concerns Principle and results in “Spaghetti code”, like in the example below.
....
if (user != null)
{
if (subscription != null)
{
if (term == Term.Annually)
{
// code 1
}
else if (term == Term.Monthly)
{
// code 2
}
else
{
throw new InvalidArgumentException(nameof(term));
}
}
else
{
throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(subscription));
}
}
else
{
throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(user));
}
.....
In this article I describe the approach to splitting validation and error handling logic from the other application layers. The patterns and practices used below can be found in the Git Hub repository below.
DeviceManager.Api
Architecture overview
For simplicity I use N-tire architecture, however, explained approaches can be reused in CQRS, Event Driven, Micro Services, SOA, etc architectures.
Example architecture includes following layers:
- Presentation Layer — UI / API
- Business Logic Layer — Services or Domain Services (in case you have DDD architecture)
- Data Layer / Data Access Layer
In the diagram below shows the components and modules which belong to different layers and contains presentation/API layer, business logic layer, data access, in the right side and related validation and error handling logic in the left side.
The validation and error handling architecture contains several components which I will describe in next few sections.
API validation level
API controllers may contain a lot of validation such as parameters check, model state check etc like on example below. I will use declarative programming to move validation logic out from API controller.
[HttpGet]
[SwaggerOperation("GetDevices")]
[ValidateActionParameters]
public IActionResult Get([FromQuery][Required]int page, [FromQuery][Required]int pageSize)
{
if (!this.ModelState.IsValid)
{
return new BadRequestObjectResult(this.ModelState);
}
return new ObjectResult(deviceService.GetDevices(page, pageSize));
}
API controllers can be easily cleaned by creating validation model attribute. Example below contains simple model validation check.
using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc;
using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Filters;
namespace DeviceManager.Api.ActionFilters
{
/// <summary>
/// Intriduces Model state auto validation to reduce code duplication
/// </summary>
/// <seealso cref="Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Filters.ActionFilterAttribute" />
public class ValidateModelStateAttribute : ActionFilterAttribute
{
/// <summary>
/// Validates Model automaticaly
/// </summary>
/// <param name="context"></param>
/// <inheritdoc />
public override void OnActionExecuting(ActionExecutingContext context)
{
if (!context.ModelState.IsValid)
{
context.Result = new BadRequestObjectResult(context.ModelState);
}
}
}
}
Just add this attribute to the startup.cs
services.AddMvc(options =>
{
options.Filters.Add(typeof(ValidateModelStateAttribute));
});
To validate parameters of API action methods I will create an attribute and move validation logic. Logic inside attribute checks if parameters contains validation attributes and validates the value.
Now attribute can be added to the action method, if necessary. (examples below)
[HttpGet]
[SwaggerOperation("GetDevices")] [ValidateActionParameters]
public IActionResult Get(
[FromQuery, Required]int page,
[FromQuery, Required]int pageSize)
{
return new ObjectResult(deviceService.GetDevices(page, pageSize)); }
Business layer validation
Business layer validation consists 2 components: validation service and validation rules.
In the device validation services I’ve moved all custom validation and rule based validation logic from the service (Device service in the example below). This idea quite similar to using Guard pattern. Below the example of the validation service.
using System;
using DeviceManager.Api.Model;
using DeviceManager.Api.Validation;
using FluentValidation;
namespace DeviceManager.Api.Services
{
/// <inheritdoc />
public class DeviceValidationService : IDeviceValidationService
{
private readonly IDeviceViewModelValidationRules deviceViewModelValidationRules;
/// <summary>
/// Initializes a new instance of the <see cref="DeviceValidationService"/> class.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="deviceViewModelValidationRules">The device view model validation rules.</param>
public DeviceValidationService(
IDeviceViewModelValidationRules deviceViewModelValidationRules)
{
this.deviceViewModelValidationRules = deviceViewModelValidationRules;
}
/// <summary>
/// Validates the specified device view model.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="deviceViewModel">The device view model.</param>
/// <returns></returns>
/// <exception cref="ValidationException"></exception>
public IDeviceValidationService Validate(DeviceViewModel deviceViewModel)
{
var validationResult = deviceViewModelValidationRules.Validate(deviceViewModel);
if (!validationResult.IsValid)
{
throw new ValidationException(validationResult.Errors);
}
return this;
}
/// <summary>
/// Validates the device identifier.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="deviceId">The device identifier.</param>
/// <returns></returns>
/// <exception cref="ValidationException">Shuld not be empty</exception>
public IDeviceValidationService ValidateDeviceId(Guid deviceId)
{
if (deviceId == Guid.Empty)
{
throw new ValidationException("Should not be empty");
}
return this;
}
}
}
In the rules I’ve moved all possible validation checks related to the view or API models. In the example below you can see Device view model validation rules. The validation itself triggers inside the the validation service.
The Validation rules based on FluentValidation framework which allows you you build rules in fluent format.
using DeviceManager.Api.Model;
using FluentValidation;
namespace DeviceManager.Api.Validation
{
/// <summary>
/// Validation rules related to Device controller
/// </summary>
public class DeviceViewModelValidationRules : AbstractValidator<DeviceViewModel>, IDeviceViewModelValidationRules
{
/// <summary>
/// Initializes a new instance of the <see cref="DeviceViewModelValidationRules"/> class.
/// <example>
/// All validation rules can be found here: https://github.com/JeremySkinner/FluentValidation/wiki/a.-Index
/// </example>
/// </summary>
public DeviceViewModelValidationRules()
{
RuleFor(device => device.DeviceCode)
.NotEmpty()
.Length(5, 10);
RuleFor(device => device.DeviceCode)
.NotEmpty();
RuleFor(device => device.Title)
.NotEmpty();
}
}
}
Exception handling Middleware
The last turn I will cover errors/exception handling. I address this topic to the end as all validation components generate exceptions and the centralized component that handles them and provide proper JSON error object is required to have.
In the example below I’ve used .NET core Middleware to catch all exceptions and created HTTP error status, according to Exception Type (in ConfigurationExceptionType method) and build error JSON object.
Also Middleware can be used to log all exception in one place.
using System;
using System.Net;
using System.Threading.Tasks;
using DeviceManager.Api.Model;
using FluentValidation;
using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Http;
using Newtonsoft.Json;
namespace DeviceManager.Api.Middlewares
{
/// <summary>
/// Central error/exception handler Middleware
/// </summary>
public class ExceptionHandlerMiddleware
{
private const string JsonContentType = "application/json";
private readonly RequestDelegate request;
/// <summary>
/// Initializes a new instance of the <see cref="ExceptionHandlerMiddleware"/> class.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="next">The next.</param>
public ExceptionHandlerMiddleware(RequestDelegate next)
{
this.request = next;
}
/// <summary>
/// Invokes the specified context.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="context">The context.</param>
/// <returns></returns>
public Task Invoke(HttpContext context) => this.InvokeAsync(context);
async Task InvokeAsync(HttpContext context)
{
try
{
await this.request(context);
}
catch (Exception exception)
{
var httpStatusCode = ConfigurateExceptionTypes(exception);
// set http status code and content type
context.Response.StatusCode = httpStatusCode;
context.Response.ContentType = JsonContentType;
// writes / returns error model to the response
await context.Response.WriteAsync(
JsonConvert.SerializeObject(new ErrorModelViewModel
{
Message = exception.Message
}));
context.Response.Headers.Clear();
}
}
/// <summary>
/// Configurates/maps exception to the proper HTTP error Type
/// </summary>
/// <param name="exception">The exception.</param>
/// <returns></returns>
private static int ConfigurateExceptionTypes(Exception exception)
{
int httpStatusCode;
// Exception type To Http Status configuration
switch (exception)
{
case var _ when exception is ValidationException:
httpStatusCode = (int) HttpStatusCode.BadRequest;
break;
default:
httpStatusCode = (int) HttpStatusCode.InternalServerError;
break;
}
return httpStatusCode;
}
}
}
Conclusion
In this article I covered several option to create maintainable validation architecture. The main goal of this article is to clean up business, presentation and data access logic. I would not recommend considering these approaches as “Silver bullets” as along with advantages they have several disadvantages.
For example:
- Middleware — overrides existing response flow which good option for the API and may be disadvantage for Web solutions. You may need to have 2 middlewares for different solution types.
Source code
All examples can be found implemented in the ready-to-go framework here
Разбор ошибок валидации сайта
Наконец-то появилось свободное время между бесконечной чередой заказов, и я решил заняться своим блогом. Попробуем его улучшить в плане валидации. Ниже в статье я расскажу, что такое валидация сайта, кода html и css, зачем она нужна и как привести сайт к стандартам на конкретном примере.
Что такое валидация сайта?
Простыми словами – это проверка на соответствие стандартам. Чтобы любой браузер мог отображать ваш сайт корректно. Большое влияние валидность сайта на продвижение не оказывает, но хуже точно не будет.
Конкретный пример прохождения валидации для страницы сайта
Возьмем первую попавшуюся страницу на моем сайте — Кодирование и декодирование base64 на Java 8. Забьем адрес страницы в валидатор и смотрим результат:
Errors found while checking this document as HTML 4.01 Transitional! Result: 105 Errors, 67 warning(s)
Да уж, картина вырисовывается неприятная: больше сотни ошибок и 67 предупреждений – как вообще поисковики индексируют мой блог, и заходят люди? Но не будем огорчаться, а научимся проходить валидацию, справлять ошибки. Итак, первое предупреждение:
Unable to Determine Parse Mode! The validator can process documents either as XML (for document types such as XHTML, SVG, etc.) or SGML (for HTML 4.01 and prior versions). For this document, the information available was not sufficient to determine the parsing mode unambiguously, because: the MIME Media Type (text/html) can be used for XML or SGML document types No known Document Type could be detected No XML declaration (e.g <?xml version="1.0"?>) could be found at the beginning of the document. No XML namespace (e.g <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en">) could be found at the root of the document. As a default, the validator is falling back to SGML mode. Warning No DOCTYPE found! Checking with default HTML 4.01 Transitional Document Type. No DOCTYPE Declaration could be found or recognized in this document. This generally means that the document is not declaring its Document Type at the top. It can also mean that the DOCTYPE declaration contains a spelling error, or that it is not using the correct syntax. The document was checked using a default "fallback" Document Type Definition that closely resembles “HTML 4.01 Transitional”.
Это одно и тоже. А исправляется просто: в самом начале страницы добавить тег:
<!DOCTYPE html>
Проверяем ,что у нас получилось и видим, что одним этим тегом мы убрали 105 ошибок и 3 предупреждения! Теперь у нас осталось только 64 предупреждения. Начинаем разбирать их по одному.
Warning: The type attribute for the style element is not needed and should be omitted. From line 5, column 1; to line 5, column 23 /x-icon">↩<style type="text/css">↩↩↩↩A
Это значит, что для элемента style не нужен атрибут type – это лишнее. На странице у нас два таких замечания. Аналогичное предупреждение и по JavaScript:
Warning: The type attribute is unnecessary for JavaScript resources. From line 418, column 1; to line 418, column 31 </script>↩<script type="text/javascript">↩$(doc
Таких у нас 8 ошибок. Убираем данные атрибуты и ура – еще на 10 предупреждений меньше!
Error: CSS: background: The first argument to the linear-gradient function should be to top, not top. At line 39, column 61 0%,#E8E8E8 100%);↩ border-r
Следующая ошибка — первый аргумент у linear-gradient должен быть to top, а не top. Исправлем. Далее ошибка:
Error: CSS: Parse Error. From line 65, column 13; to line 65, column 16 margin: 0 auto;↩padd
Здесь у меня неверно закомментировано css. Надо просто убрать эту строку. Или закомментировать по-другому /* и */. Я так сделал, как привык так комментировать на Java.
Error: CSS: @import are not allowed after any valid statement other than @charset and @import.. At line 88, column 74 0,600,700,300);↩@import url(//
Теперь у нас идет ошибка импорта. Перенесем эти строчки в самое начало файла и она исчезнет.
Error: Bad value _blanck for attribute target on element a: Reserved keyword blanck used. From line 241, column 218; to line 241, column 295 cookies. <a href="//upread.ru/art.php?id=98" target="_blanck" style="display: inline;">Здесь
Далее не нравится значение атрибута target, нам сообщают, что надо использовать «blank» без нижнего подчеркивания спереди. Убираем.
Error: End tag li seen, but there were open elements. From line 379, column 2; to line 379, column 6 <ul>↩ </li>↩↩</ul
Теперь у нас идет div не на месте.
Error: Table columns in range 2…3 established by element td have no cells beginning in them. From line 262, column 5; to line 263, column 94 px;">↩<tr>↩<td colspan="3" style="width:100%; padding-bottom: 25px;padding-top: 0px; text-align:center;">↩<img
Следующая ошибка – лишний colspan у ячейки. В моем случае таблица состоит всего из одной ячейки, видимо, забыл убрать, когда менял дизайн. Теперь это и делаем.
Error: Element style not allowed as child of element div in this context. (Suppressing further errors from this subtree.) From line 486, column 1; to line 486, column 7 ↩</table>↩<tyle>↩.hleb Contexts in which element style may be used: Where metadata content is expected. In a noscript element that is a child of a head element. In the body, where flow content is expected. Content model for element div: If the element is a child of a dl element: one or more dt elements followed by one or more dd elements, optionally intermixed with script-supporting elements. If the element is not a child of a dl element: Flow content.
А эта ошибка говорит о том, что нельзя вставлять style внутри div. Переносим в начало файла.
Error: The width attribute on the table element is obsolete. Use CSS instead. From line 505, column 1; to line 505, column 21 >↩↩↩↩↩↩↩↩↩<table width ="100%">↩<tr>↩
Тут нам подсказывают, что не стоит устанавливать ширину атрибутом, а лучше сделать это отдельным тегом. Меняем на style=»width:100%;».
Error: Duplicate attribute style. At line 507, column 41 ign="top" style="padding-right
Переводим: дублируется атрибут style. Второй стиль при этом работать не будет. Объединяем
Error: Attribute name not allowed on element td at this point. From line 506, column 5; to line 507, column 82 0%;">↩<tr>↩<td style="width:1%;padding-right:10px;" valign="top" name="navigid" id="navigid">↩↩↩↩</ Attributes for element td: Global attributes colspan - Number of columns that the cell is to span rowspan - Number of rows that the cell is to span headers - The header cells for this cell
У ячейки не должно быть имени – атрибута name. Тут в принципе можно убрать, id вполне хватит.
Error: The valign attribute on the td element is obsolete. Use CSS instead. From line 506, column 5; to line 507, column 67 0%;">↩<tr>↩<td style="width:1%;padding-right:10px;" valign="top" id="navigid">↩↩↩↩</
Убираем valign. Вместо него ставим style=»vertical-align:top».
Error: & did not start a character reference. (& probably should have been escaped as &.) At line 543, column 232 при lineLength &t;= 0) и lineS
А эта ошибка вообще непонятно как оказалась ) Это я коде к статье ошибся. Меняем на <
Error: An img element must have an alt attribute, except under certain conditions. For details, consult guidance on providing text alternatives for images. From line 654, column 1; to line 654, column 30 /><br />↩<img src="img/art374-1.jpg" />↩<br /
У изображений должен быть alt. Добавляем альты с описанием картинок.
Error: CSS: padding: only 0 can be a unit. You must put a unit after your number. From line 260, column 18; to line 260, column 19 dding: 10 20;↩}↩↩#
Только ноль может быть без обозначений. Надо поставить что – это пиксели, или к примеру, проценты. Добавляем px после чисел.
Warning: The document is not mappable to XML 1.0 due to two consecutive hyphens in a comment. At line 974, column 8 ipt> ↩↩↩ <!--детектим адблок
Не нравятся комментарии. Да, в общем, их можно и убрать, не разбираясь, не особенно они и нужны.
Error: Stray end tag td. From line 982, column 1; to line 982, column 5 ↩</table>↩</td>↩↩<sty
Заблудившийся тег td. Убираем его.
Error: Bad value for attribute action on element form: Must be non-empty. From line 1102, column 6; to line 1102, column 98 /h6>↩ <form action="" id="jaloba-to-me" class="submit" method="POST" accept-charset="windows-1251"> <tabl
Здесь валидатор не устраивает пустое значение атрибута action – должен быть адрес страницы какой-то. У нас обрабатывается данная форма js, так что без разницы, поставим action=”self”
Все! Смотрим результат:
Нет ошибок или предупреждений, страница полностью валидна.
Если вам что-то непонятно в статье или вы хотите, чтобы ваш сайт полностью соответствовал спецификации и стандартам HTML ,вы можете обратиться ко мне. Я проверю и устраню любые шибки валидации.
Автор этого материала — я — Пахолков Юрий. Я оказываю услуги по написанию программ на языках Java, C++, C# (а также консультирую по ним) и созданию сайтов. Работаю с сайтами на CMS OpenCart, WordPress, ModX и самописными. Кроме этого, работаю напрямую с JavaScript, PHP, CSS, HTML — то есть могу доработать ваш сайт или помочь с веб-программированием. Пишите сюда.
заметки, сайтостроение, html, валидация
Ошибки валидации – это ошибки в коде страниц сайта, при этом ошибки на главной странице и на внутренних страницах сайта могут отличаться друг от друга. Сайт считается валидным, если у него отсутствуют ошибки в коде страниц сайта. Ошибки могут появляться в ходе разработки сайта, например, когда неверно закрыты html-теги или не закрыты вовсе, когда используются устаревшие теги, не задан тип документа (<!DOCTYPE html>), некорректно организована вложенность элементов и другие. Часть ошибок могут быть видимыми, и пользователь сможет заметить их при посещении страниц сайта, часть ошибок может быть скрытой от глаз.
Наиболее популярный и зарекомендовавший себя валидатор, на наш взгляд, – validator.w3.org, он сканирует сайт на наличие ошибок в соответствии с принятыми Консорциумом Всемирной паутины стандартами. Данный валидатор имеет 3 способа проверки на ошибки: ввести URL конкретной страницы вашего сайта, загрузить файл страницы сайта и ввести часть кода сайта, которую необходимо проверить.
После выполнения проверки вам будет предоставлен список ошибок на странице с указанием описания ошибки, номер строки с ошибкой и в какой части строки содержится ошибка.
Присутствует функция фильтрации ошибок, с помощью которой вы можете исправлять по очереди конкретные группы ошибок, кроме этого для каждой ошибки предоставляется ссылка на w3c стандарты, где можно ознакомиться с причиной появления данной ошибки.
Также существуют плагины для браузеров для поиска ошибок на страницах сайта.
http://users.skynet.be/mgueury/mozilla/ – плагин для Mozilla
https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/html-tidy-browser-extensi/gljdonhfjnfdklljmfaabfpjlonflfnm – плагин для Chrome
https://addons.opera.com/en/extensions/details/validator/ – плагин для Opera
После того как сайт проверили на ошибки, встает вполне резонный вопрос: нужно ли их немедленно удалять и чем это чревато при SEO-продвижении?
Поисковые системы при ранжировании сайтов в поисковой выдаче все же уделяют больше внимания другим аспектам, таким как внутренняя оптимизация сайта, ссылочный профиль, контент. Но и валидацию полностью игнорировать все же не стоит.
В первую очередь рекомендую обратить внимание на ошибки, связанные с контентом, т.к. для поисковиков данный фактор является важным при ранжировании сайтов. Если ошибок на страницах сайта достаточно много (более 25), то настоятельно рекомендуется устранять ошибки в коде, т.к. сайты с большим количеством ошибок дольше загружаются, а также их сложнее проиндексировать, что может привести к отсутствию части страниц сайта в индексе поисковой системы.
Давайте проанализируем, сколько ошибок присутствует в коде страниц у крупных ресурсов.
Яндекс:
Google:
ОАО «РЖД»:
Как вы уже заметили, даже у сайтов поисковых систем присутствуют ошибки в коде страниц, что лишний раз подтверждает, что устранение ошибок носит скорее рекомендательный характер, при этом стоит упомянуть, что не нужно пренебрегать этим фактором и «запускать» ваш сайт. Развивайте сайт комплексно, всесторонне, тогда и результат будет соответствовать вашим ожиданиям.
Кстати, проверка сайта на ошибки, которые действительно влияют на продвижение, проходит в рамках SEO-аудита. Если сомневаетесь, что можете адекватно оценить свой сайт на наличие ошибок, обращайтесь.