Http error 308

A close look at the 308 Permanent Redirect response code, including troubleshooting tips to help you resolve this error in your own application.

Jan 11, 2018 6:00:19 PM |
308 Permanent Redirect: What It Is and How to Fix It

A close look at the 308 Permanent Redirect response code, including troubleshooting tips to help you resolve this error in your own application.

A 308 Permanent Redirect message is an HTTP response status code indicating that the requested resource has been permanently moved to another URI, as indicated by the special Location header returned within the response. The 308 Permanent Redirect code was added to the HTTP standard relatively recently in April 2015, as detailed in the RFC7538 specification document for the 308 status code. As written in the RFC specification, the 308 Permanent Redirect code was necessary to fill in the gap left with similar codes of 301, 302, and 307.

There are dozens of possible HTTP status codes used to represent the complex relationship between the client, a web application, a web server, and the multitude of third-party web services that may be in use, so determining the cause of a particular HTTP response status code can be difficult. Since there are so many potential codes, each of which represents a completely different status or event, it can be difficult to differentiate between many of them and determine the exact cause of such errors, including the 308 Permanent Redirect response code.

Throughout this article we’ll explore the 308 Permanent Redirect code by looking at a handful of troubleshooting tips. We’ll also examine a few useful and easy to implement fixes for common problems that could be causing 308 codes to appear in your own web application. Let’s get down to it!

The Problem is Server-Side

All HTTP response status codes within the 3xx category are considered redirection messages. These codes indicate to the user agent (i.e. your web browser) that an additional action is required in order to complete the request and access the desired resource. The 3xx response code category is distinctly different from the 5xx codes category, which encompasses server error messages. For example, the 503 Service Unavailable error we explored a late last year indicates that a server is temporarily unavailable, or is unable to handle the request for some reason. Thus, while a 5xx category code indicates an actual problem has occurred on a server, a 3xx category code, such as 308 Permanent Redirect, is rarely indicative of an actual problem — it merely occurs due to the server’s behavior or configuration, but is not indicative of an error or bug on the server.

The 308 Permanent Redirect code is similar to the 301 Moved Permanently code we explore in our 301 Moved Permanently: What It Is and How to Fix It article. As discussed in that post, the RFC1945 HTTP/1.0 specification document explicitly states that the 301 code should not necessarily inform user agents (i.e. browsers) to automatically redirect POST HTTP method requests to GET HTTP method requests. However, many user agents did erroneously change POST requests to GET redirect requests, which led to unintentional problems.

To handle this explicit allowance or denial of changing POST requests to GET requests the HTTP standards included the following codes:

  • 301 Moved Permanently: The resource has been permanently moved and request method conversion from POST to GET is allowed.
  • 307 Temporary Redirect: The resource has been temporarily moved and request method conversion from POST to GET is forbidden.
  • 302 Found: The resource has been temporarily moved and request method conversion from POST to GET is allowed.

As you can see, this set of three HTTP status codes is missing a code that indicates a permanent redirect that forbids POST to GET conversion. This is the exact role that the 308 Permanent Redirect status code fulfills.

The appearance of a 308 Permanent Redirect is usually not something that requires much user intervention. All modern browsers will automatically detect the 308 Permanent Redirect response code and process the redirection action to the new URI automatically. The server sending a 308 code will also include a special Location header as part of the response it sends to the client. This Location header indicates the new URI where the requested resource can be found. For example, if an HTTP POST method request is sent by the client as an attempt to login at the https://airbrake.io URL, the web server may be configured to redirect this POST request to a different URI, such as https://airbrake.io/login. In this scenario, the server may respond with a 308 Permanent Redirect code and include the Location: https://airbrake.io/login header in the response. This informs the user agent (browser) that the POST request data (login info) was received by the server, but the resource has been permanently moved to the Location header URI of https://airbrake.io/login.

It’s also important to distinguish the purpose and use-cases of the 308 Permanent Redirect response code from many seemingly similar 3xx codes, such as the 307 Temporary Redirect we looked at in the past. The 307 Temporary Redirect code informs the client that the passed Location URI is only a temporary resource, and that all future requests should continue to access the originally requested URI. On the other hand, the 308 Permanent Redirect message is permanent and indicates that the passed Location URI should be used for future (identical) requests.

Additionally, since the 308 Permanent Redirect indicates that something has gone wrong within the server of your application, we can largely disregard the client side of things. If you’re trying to diagnose an issue with your own application, you can immediately ignore most client-side code and components, such as HTML, cascading style sheets (CSS), client-side JavaScript, and so forth. This doesn’t apply solely to web sites, either. Many smart phone apps that have a modern looking user interface are actually powered by a normal web application behind the scenes; one that is simply hidden from the user. If you’re using such an application and a 308 Permanent Redirect occurs, the issue isn’t going to be related to the app installed on your phone or local testing device. Instead, it will be something on the server-side, which is performing most of the logic and processing behind the scenes, outside the purview of the local interface presented to the user.

If your application is generating unexpected 308 Permanent Redirect response codes there are a number of steps you can take to diagnose the problem, so we’ll explore a few potential work around below.

Start With a Thorough Application Backup

As with anything, it’s better to have played it safe at the start than to screw something up and come to regret it later on down the road. As such, it is critical that you perform a full backup of your application, database, and so forth, before attempting any fixes or changes to the system. Even better, if you have the capability, create a complete copy of the application onto a secondary staging server that isn’t «live,» or isn’t otherwise active and available to the public. This will give you a clean testing ground with which to test all potential fixes to resolve the issue, without threatening the security or sanctity of your live application.

Diagnosing a 308 Permanent Redirect Response Code

A 308 Permanent Redirect response code indicates that the requested resource has been permanently moved to the new URI specified in the Location response header. However, the appearance of this error itself may be erroneous, as it’s entirely possible that the server is misconfigured, which could cause it to improperly respond with 308 Permanent Redirect codes, instead of the standard and expected 200 OK code seen for most successful requests. Thus, a large part of diagnosing the issue will be going through the process of double-checking what resources/URLs are generating 308 Permanent Redirect response codes and determining if these codes are appropriate or not.

If your application is responding with 308 Permanent Redirect codes that it should not be issuing, this is a problem that many other visitors may be experiencing as well, dramatically hindering your application’s ability to service users. We’ll go over some troubleshooting tips and tricks to help you try to resolve this issue. If nothing here works, don’t forget to try Googling for the answer. Search for specific terms related to your issue, such as the name of your application’s CMS or web server software, along with 308 Permanent Redirect. Chances are you’ll find others who have experienced this issue and have (hopefully) found a solution.

Troubleshooting on the Server-Side

Here are some additional tips to help you troubleshoot what might be causing the 308 Permanent Redirect to appear on the server-side of things:

Confirm Your Server Configuration

Your application is likely running on a server that is using one of the two most popular web server softwares, Apache or nginx. At the time of publication, both of these web servers make up over 84% of the world’s web server software! Thus, one of the first steps you can take to determine what might be causing these 308 Permanent Redirect response codes is to check the configuration files for your web server software for unintentional redirect instructions.

To determine which web server your application is using you’ll want to look for a key file. If your web server is Apache then look for an .htaccess file within the root directory of your website file system. For example, if your application is on a shared host you’ll likely have a username associated with the hosting account. In such a case, the application root directory is typically found at the path of /home/<username>/public_html/, so the .htaccess file would be at /home/<username>/public_html/.htaccess.

If you located the .htaccess file then open it in a text editor and look for lines that use RewriteXXX directives, which are part of the mod_rewrite module in Apache. Covering exactly how these rules work is well beyond the scope of this article, however, the basic concept is that a RewriteCond directive defines a text-based pattern that will be matched against entered URLs. If a matching URL is requested by a visitor to the site, the RewriteRule directive that follows one or more RewriteCond directives is used to perform the actual redirection of the request to the appropriate URL.

For example, here is a simple RewriteCond and RewriteRule combination that matches all incoming requests to airbrake.io using the HTTP POST method, and redirecting them to https://airbrake.io/login via a 308 Permanent Redirect response:

RewriteEngine on
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^airbrake.io$
RewriteRule ^(.*)$ https://airbrake.io/login$1 [R=308]

Notice the extra flag at the end of the RewriteRule, which explicitly states that the response code should be 308, indicating to user agents that the request should be repeated to the specified URI, but while retaining the original HTTP method (POST, in this case). Thus, if you find any strange RewriteCond or RewriteRule directives in the .htaccess file that don’t seem to belong, try temporarily commenting them out (using the # character prefix) and restarting your web server to see if this resolves the issue.

On the other hand, if your server is running on nginx, you’ll need to look for a completely different configuration file. By default this file is named nginx.conf and is located in one of a few common directories: /usr/local/nginx/conf, /etc/nginx, or /usr/local/etc/nginx. Once located, open nginx.conf in a text editor and look for return or rewrite directives that are using the 308 response code flag. For example, here is a simple block directive (i.e. a named set of directives) that configures a virtual server by creating a redirection from airbrake.io to airbrake.io/login for POST HTTP method requests:

server {
listen 80;
listen 443 ssl;
server_name airbrake.io;
if ($request_method = POST) {
return 308 https://airbrake.io/login$request_uri;
}
}

Return directives in nginx are similar to the RewriteCond and RewriteRule directives found in Apache, as they tend to contain more complex text-based patterns for searching. Either way, look through your nginx.conf file for any abnormal return or rewrite directives that include the 308 flag. Comment out any abnormalities before restarting the server to see if the issue was resolved.

Scour the Logs

Nearly every web application will keep some form of server-side logs. Application logs are typically the history of what the application did, such as which pages were requested, which servers it connected to, which database results it provides, and so forth. Server logs are related to the actual hardware that is running the application, and will often provide details about the health and status of all connected services, or even just the server itself. Google «logs [PLATFORM_NAME]» if you’re using a CMS, or «logs [PROGRAMMING_LANGUAGE]» and «logs [OPERATING_SYSTEM]» if you’re running a custom application, to get more information on finding the logs in question.

Debug Your Application Code

If all else fails, it may be that a problem in some custom code within your application is causing the issue. Try to diagnose where the issue may be coming from through manually debugging your application, along with parsing through application and server logs. Ideally, make a copy of the entire application to a local development machine and perform a step-by-step debug process, which will allow you to recreate the exact scenario in which the 308 Permanent Redirect occurred and view the application code at the moment something goes wrong.

No matter what the cause, the appearance of a 308 Permanent Redirect within your own web application is a strong indication that you may need an error management tool to help you automatically detect such errors in the future. The best of these tools can even alert you and your team immediately when an error occurs. Airbrake’s error monitoring software provides real-time error monitoring and automatic exception reporting for all your development projects. Airbrake’s state of the art web dashboard ensures you receive round-the-clock status updates on your application’s health and error rates. No matter what you’re working on, Airbrake easily integrates with all the most popular languages and frameworks. Plus, Airbrake makes it easy to customize exception parameters, while giving you complete control of the active error filter system, so you only gather the errors that matter most.

Check out Airbrake’s error monitoring software today and see for yourself why so many of the world’s best engineering teams use Airbrake to revolutionize their exception handling practices!

The Hypertext Transfer Protocol Status Code 308 (Permanent Redirect)


Abstract

This document specifies the additional Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) status code 308 (Permanent Redirect).

Status of This Memo

This is an Internet Standards Track document.

This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has received public review and has been approved for publication by the Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Further information on Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 5741.

Information about the current status of this document, any errata, and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7538.

Copyright Notice

Copyright (c) 2015 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.

This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust’s Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License.

  • 1.   Introduction
  • 2.   Notational Conventions
  • 3.   308 Permanent Redirect
  • 4.   Deployment Considerations
  • 5.   Security Considerations
  • 6.   IANA Considerations
  • 7.   References
    • 7.1.   Normative References
    • 7.2.   Informative References
  • Acknowledgements
  • Author’s Address

1. Introduction

HTTP defines a set of status codes for the purpose of redirecting a request to a different URI ([RFC3986]). The history of these status codes is summarized in Section 6.4 of [RFC7231], which also classifies the existing status codes into four categories.

The first of these categories contains the status codes 301 (Moved Permanently), 302 (Found), and 307 (Temporary Redirect), which can be classified as below:

Permanent Temporary
Allows changing the request method from POST to GET 301 302
Does not allow changing the request method from POST to GET 307

Section 6.4.7 of [RFC7231] states that it does not define a permanent variant of status code 307; this specification adds the status code 308, defining this missing variant (Section 3).

This specification contains no technical changes from the Experimental RFC 7238, which it obsoletes.

2. Notational Conventions

The key words «MUST», «MUST NOT», «REQUIRED», «SHALL», «SHALL NOT», «SHOULD», «SHOULD NOT», «RECOMMENDED», «MAY», and «OPTIONAL» in this document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].

3. 308 Permanent Redirect

The 308 (Permanent Redirect) status code indicates that the target resource has been assigned a new permanent URI and any future references to this resource ought to use one of the enclosed URIs. Clients with link editing capabilities ought to automatically re-link references to the effective request URI (Section 5.5 of [RFC7230]) to one or more of the new references sent by the server, where possible.

The server SHOULD generate a Location header field ([RFC7231], Section 7.1.2) in the response containing a preferred URI reference for the new permanent URI. The user agent MAY use the Location field value for automatic redirection. The server’s response payload usually contains a short hypertext note with a hyperlink to the new URI(s).

A 308 response is cacheable by default; i.e., unless otherwise indicated by the method definition or explicit cache controls (see [RFC7234], Section 4.2.2).

4. Deployment Considerations

Section 6 of [RFC7231] requires recipients to treat unknown 3xx status codes the same way as status code 300 (Multiple Choices) ([RFC7231], Section 6.4.1). Thus, servers will not be able to rely on automatic redirection happening similar to status codes 301, 302, or 307.

Therefore, the use of status code 308 is restricted to cases where the server has sufficient confidence in the client’s understanding the new code or when a fallback to the semantics of status code 300 is not problematic. Server implementers are advised not to vary the status code based on characteristics of the request, such as the User-Agent header field («User-Agent Sniffing») — doing so usually results in code that is both hard to maintain and hard to debug and would also require special attention to caching (i.e., setting a «Vary» response header field, as defined in Section 7.1.4 of [RFC7231]).

Note that many existing HTML-based user agents will emulate a refresh when encountering an HTML <meta> refresh directive ([HTML], Section 4.2.5.3). This can be used as another fallback. For example:

Client request:

GET / HTTP/1.1
Host: example.com

Server response:

HTTP/1.1 308 Permanent Redirect
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Location: http://example.com/new
Content-Length: 356

<!DOCTYPE HTML>
<html>
   <head>
      <title>Permanent Redirect</title>
      <meta http-equiv="refresh" 
            content="0; url=http://example.com/new">
   </head>
   <body>
      <p>
         The document has been moved to
         <a href="http://example.com/new"
         >http://example.com/new</a>.
      </p>
   </body>
</html>

5. Security Considerations

All security considerations that apply to HTTP redirects apply to the 308 status code as well (see Section 9 of [RFC7231]).

Unsecured communication over the Internet is subject to man-in-the-middle modification of messages, including changing status codes or redirect targets. Use of Transport Layer Security (TLS) is one way to mitigate those attacks. See Section 9 of [RFC7230] for related attacks on authority and message integrity.

6. IANA Considerations

Value Description Reference
308 Permanent Redirect Section 3 of this specification

7. References

7.1. Normative References

[RFC2119]
Bradner, S., “Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels”, BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.
[RFC3986]
Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R., and L. Masinter, “Uniform Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax”, STD 66, RFC 3986, January 2005, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3986>.
[RFC7230]
Fielding, R., Ed. and J. Reschke, Ed., “Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Message Syntax and Routing”, RFC 7230, June 2014, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7230>.
[RFC7231]
Fielding, R., Ed. and J. Reschke, Ed., “Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Semantics and Content”, RFC 7231, June 2014, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7231>.
[RFC7234]
Fielding, R., Ed., Nottingham, M., Ed., and J. Reschke, Ed., “Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Caching”, RFC 7234, June 2014, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7234>.

7.2. Informative References

[HTML]
Hickson, I., Berjon, R., Faulkner, S., Leithead, T., Doyle Navara, E., O’Connor, E., and S. Pfeiffer, “HTML5”, W3C Recommendation REC-html5-20141028, October 2014, <http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/REC-html5-20141028/>.
Latest version available at <http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/>.

Acknowledgements

The definition for the new status code 308 reuses text from the HTTP/1.1 definitions of status codes 301 and 307.

Furthermore, thanks to Ben Campbell, Cyrus Daboo, Adrian Farrell, Eran Hammer-Lahav, Bjoern Hoehrmann, Barry Leiba, Subramanian Moonesamy, Kathleen Moriarty, Peter Saint-Andre, Robert Sparks, and Roy Fielding for feedback on this document.

Author’s Address

Julian F. Reschke
greenbytes GmbH
Hafenweg 16
Muenster, NW 48155
Germany
Email: julian.reschke@greenbytes.de
URI: http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/

Mar 15, 22  |  Ibrahim Imran

What exactly is a 308 Permanent Redirect, and how do you fix 308 error code? Here’s how to handle the status code without causing more harm to your site.

You’ve probably heard about 301 redirects if you own a website. Have you ever encountered a status code of 308 Permanent Redirect?

These are less well-known, yet they may be equally important to your marketing efforts.

Here’s all you need to know about the 308 Permanent Redirect status code, as well as tried-and-true solutions for correcting it without causing more harm to your website.

>>> Hire the Best Mobile App Development Companies 

308 Error Code

What Is a 308 Permanent Redirect and How Does It Work?

Before we get right into how to fix 308 error code, let’s discuss what it is and how it works. 

Similar to 301 Moved Permanently, 308 Permanent Redirect indicates that the resource the user attempted to access has moved to a different URI.

The 308 is a relatively new code that was just introduced to the RFC7238 specification to fill the void left by codes like 301, 302, and 307.

>>> Learn how to Fix 408 Error Code 

Is This a Client-Side Error?

Let’s have a look at how the internet works before we answer this question.

On the internet, there are two key players: servers and clients.

Assume you’re using your browser to access a website. You’re using a web client to connect to the internet.

With your request to access the web page, the web client sends a message to the server. When you make a request to your server to access a resource, the server responds with an HTTP status code.

A successful request, a client error, or a server error are all possible status codes. In actuality, there are five different types of HTTP response status codes:

  • Status codes 1xx: Requests for information
  • 2xx status codes indicate that the request was successful.
  • Redirects are represented by the 3xx status codes.
  • 4xx codes of status: Errors by clients
  • Server failures are indicated by the 5xx status codes.

Despite their differences, they all inform a user whether a certain HTTP request has been completed successfully.

The 308 Permanent Redirect that we’re investigating today is part of the 3xx status codes or redirects group. Some of the status codes in the category, such as 301 Moved Permanently and 307 Temporary Redirect, might have a direct impact on your site’s user experience and SEO health.

In comparison, status codes in the 4xx group – such as the 404 Not Found error – indicate a problem on the client side. The 5xx status codes, on the other hand, indicate that the issue is caused by anything on the server side of things.

We can completely disregard the client-side of things because the 308 Permanent Redirect indicates a problem on the server side.

>>> Error Playing Content 403 Forbidden: How To Fix

What Is the Difference Between Redirects 301, 302, 307, and 308?

Let’s understand the differences of each before we get into how to fix 308 error code.

One of the most prevalent redirects is the 301 redirect. It signifies that the resource has been transferred permanently and that change of the request method from POST to GET is permitted. If you want to permanently redirect a moved or deleted page, or if the structure of your permalinks has changed, you should use this redirect. To avoid a 404 error, always add a 301 redirect to your removed or moved pages.

302 Found: A 302 redirect is a one-time redirect that sends visitors and search engines to a different page for a set period of time. It indicates that the resource has been moved temporarily and that conversion of the request method from POST to GET is permitted. When you’re rebuilding or changing your website, use this redirect.

307 Temporary Redirect: The HTTP 1.1 successor to 302 redirects is the 307 Temporary Redirect. It indicates that the resource has been moved temporarily and that converting the request method from POST to GET is prohibited.

As you can see from the list above, this collection of codes is missing a status code that signals a permanent redirect that prevents the conversion of POST to GET. The 308 status code serves this purpose.

>>> Err_Ssl_Protocol_Error WordPress: How To Fix?

Wondering how to fix 308 Error Code

What Is a 308 Permanent Redirect Response Code and How to Fix 308 Error Code?

If your website is returning a 308 Permanent Redirect response code, follow these steps to diagnose and resolve the problem.

Make a Complete Backup of your Application.

This suggestion is more of a piece of safety advise than a code-fixing method. You must make a replica of your website on a secondary server that isn’t online or otherwise active if you don’t want to further damage it.

Before you try to remedy the problem and update the system, make a complete backup. This creates a safe environment in which you may test all potential fixes without jeopardizing the security of your live application.

Ensure that your Server is Configured Correctly.

The first real advice on the list is to examine your web server’s configuration files for any unintended redirect instructions.

Your application is served by one of two web servers: Apache or Nginx. If it’s running on an Apache server, make sure apache server and.htaccess are both checked.

If you’re using Nginx, you only need to verify one file: nginx conf_. After you’ve found the files, look for a 308 status code and see what comes up. If it does, you must change it. If you don’t require the status code, you may either remove it totally or apply it to a single page.

>>> Hire the best Software Development Companies 

Troubleshoot Your Application Code

Probably one of the best ways to fix 308 error code is to troubleshoot your app code. Server-side logs are kept by almost every web application. The history of what the application did while running a website is frequently stored in application logs.

If the troubleshooting step above didn’t solve the problem, the issue could be due to custom code in your application.

You must manually debug your application code to discover if this is the case. When something goes wrong, go through a step-by-step troubleshooting process to replicate the exact scenario that caused the 308 Permanent Redirect and see the application code.

>>> How to Resolve HTTP Error 508 WordPress Sites

Final Thoughts

The 308 Permanent Redirect status code indicates that the user’s requested resource has moved to a different URI.

The best technique to fix 308 error code is to: 

Verify your server’s settings.

Debug the code in your application.

You should invest in a reliable website maintenance solution to assist you automatically spot such mistakes in the future to avoid status codes severely influencing your user experience and SEO performance. Exai, for example, can detect an issue as soon as it arises. You can rest assured that your website is current and completely functional, allowing you to maintain a strong online presence.

If you are in need of professional help, connect with the best website development companies at Distinguished.io today. 


Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


You Might Also Like

Page semi-protected

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is a list of Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) response status codes. Status codes are issued by a server in response to a client’s request made to the server. It includes codes from IETF Request for Comments (RFCs), other specifications, and some additional codes used in some common applications of the HTTP. The first digit of the status code specifies one of five standard classes of responses. The optional message phrases shown are typical, but any human-readable alternative may be provided, or none at all.

Unless otherwise stated, the status code is part of the HTTP standard (RFC 9110).

The Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) maintains the official registry of HTTP status codes.[1]

All HTTP response status codes are separated into five classes or categories. The first digit of the status code defines the class of response, while the last two digits do not have any classifying or categorization role. There are five classes defined by the standard:

  • 1xx informational response – the request was received, continuing process
  • 2xx successful – the request was successfully received, understood, and accepted
  • 3xx redirection – further action needs to be taken in order to complete the request
  • 4xx client error – the request contains bad syntax or cannot be fulfilled
  • 5xx server error – the server failed to fulfil an apparently valid request

1xx informational response

An informational response indicates that the request was received and understood. It is issued on a provisional basis while request processing continues. It alerts the client to wait for a final response. The message consists only of the status line and optional header fields, and is terminated by an empty line. As the HTTP/1.0 standard did not define any 1xx status codes, servers must not[note 1] send a 1xx response to an HTTP/1.0 compliant client except under experimental conditions.

100 Continue
The server has received the request headers and the client should proceed to send the request body (in the case of a request for which a body needs to be sent; for example, a POST request). Sending a large request body to a server after a request has been rejected for inappropriate headers would be inefficient. To have a server check the request’s headers, a client must send Expect: 100-continue as a header in its initial request and receive a 100 Continue status code in response before sending the body. If the client receives an error code such as 403 (Forbidden) or 405 (Method Not Allowed) then it should not send the request’s body. The response 417 Expectation Failed indicates that the request should be repeated without the Expect header as it indicates that the server does not support expectations (this is the case, for example, of HTTP/1.0 servers).[2]
101 Switching Protocols
The requester has asked the server to switch protocols and the server has agreed to do so.
102 Processing (WebDAV; RFC 2518)
A WebDAV request may contain many sub-requests involving file operations, requiring a long time to complete the request. This code indicates that the server has received and is processing the request, but no response is available yet.[3] This prevents the client from timing out and assuming the request was lost.
103 Early Hints (RFC 8297)
Used to return some response headers before final HTTP message.[4]

2xx success

This class of status codes indicates the action requested by the client was received, understood, and accepted.[1]

200 OK
Standard response for successful HTTP requests. The actual response will depend on the request method used. In a GET request, the response will contain an entity corresponding to the requested resource. In a POST request, the response will contain an entity describing or containing the result of the action.
201 Created
The request has been fulfilled, resulting in the creation of a new resource.[5]
202 Accepted
The request has been accepted for processing, but the processing has not been completed. The request might or might not be eventually acted upon, and may be disallowed when processing occurs.
203 Non-Authoritative Information (since HTTP/1.1)
The server is a transforming proxy (e.g. a Web accelerator) that received a 200 OK from its origin, but is returning a modified version of the origin’s response.[6][7]
204 No Content
The server successfully processed the request, and is not returning any content.
205 Reset Content
The server successfully processed the request, asks that the requester reset its document view, and is not returning any content.
206 Partial Content
The server is delivering only part of the resource (byte serving) due to a range header sent by the client. The range header is used by HTTP clients to enable resuming of interrupted downloads, or split a download into multiple simultaneous streams.
207 Multi-Status (WebDAV; RFC 4918)
The message body that follows is by default an XML message and can contain a number of separate response codes, depending on how many sub-requests were made.[8]
208 Already Reported (WebDAV; RFC 5842)
The members of a DAV binding have already been enumerated in a preceding part of the (multistatus) response, and are not being included again.
226 IM Used (RFC 3229)
The server has fulfilled a request for the resource, and the response is a representation of the result of one or more instance-manipulations applied to the current instance.[9]

3xx redirection

This class of status code indicates the client must take additional action to complete the request. Many of these status codes are used in URL redirection.[1]

A user agent may carry out the additional action with no user interaction only if the method used in the second request is GET or HEAD. A user agent may automatically redirect a request. A user agent should detect and intervene to prevent cyclical redirects.[10]

300 Multiple Choices
Indicates multiple options for the resource from which the client may choose (via agent-driven content negotiation). For example, this code could be used to present multiple video format options, to list files with different filename extensions, or to suggest word-sense disambiguation.
301 Moved Permanently
This and all future requests should be directed to the given URI.
302 Found (Previously «Moved temporarily»)
Tells the client to look at (browse to) another URL. The HTTP/1.0 specification (RFC 1945) required the client to perform a temporary redirect with the same method (the original describing phrase was «Moved Temporarily»),[11] but popular browsers implemented 302 redirects by changing the method to GET. Therefore, HTTP/1.1 added status codes 303 and 307 to distinguish between the two behaviours.[10]
303 See Other (since HTTP/1.1)
The response to the request can be found under another URI using the GET method. When received in response to a POST (or PUT/DELETE), the client should presume that the server has received the data and should issue a new GET request to the given URI.
304 Not Modified
Indicates that the resource has not been modified since the version specified by the request headers If-Modified-Since or If-None-Match. In such case, there is no need to retransmit the resource since the client still has a previously-downloaded copy.
305 Use Proxy (since HTTP/1.1)
The requested resource is available only through a proxy, the address for which is provided in the response. For security reasons, many HTTP clients (such as Mozilla Firefox and Internet Explorer) do not obey this status code.
306 Switch Proxy
No longer used. Originally meant «Subsequent requests should use the specified proxy.»
307 Temporary Redirect (since HTTP/1.1)
In this case, the request should be repeated with another URI; however, future requests should still use the original URI. In contrast to how 302 was historically implemented, the request method is not allowed to be changed when reissuing the original request. For example, a POST request should be repeated using another POST request.
308 Permanent Redirect
This and all future requests should be directed to the given URI. 308 parallel the behaviour of 301, but does not allow the HTTP method to change. So, for example, submitting a form to a permanently redirected resource may continue smoothly.

4xx client errors

A The Wikimedia 404 message

This class of status code is intended for situations in which the error seems to have been caused by the client. Except when responding to a HEAD request, the server should include an entity containing an explanation of the error situation, and whether it is a temporary or permanent condition. These status codes are applicable to any request method. User agents should display any included entity to the user.

400 Bad Request
The server cannot or will not process the request due to an apparent client error (e.g., malformed request syntax, size too large, invalid request message framing, or deceptive request routing).
401 Unauthorized
Similar to 403 Forbidden, but specifically for use when authentication is required and has failed or has not yet been provided. The response must include a WWW-Authenticate header field containing a challenge applicable to the requested resource. See Basic access authentication and Digest access authentication. 401 semantically means «unauthorised», the user does not have valid authentication credentials for the target resource.
Some sites incorrectly issue HTTP 401 when an IP address is banned from the website (usually the website domain) and that specific address is refused permission to access a website.[citation needed]
402 Payment Required
Reserved for future use. The original intention was that this code might be used as part of some form of digital cash or micropayment scheme, as proposed, for example, by GNU Taler,[13] but that has not yet happened, and this code is not widely used. Google Developers API uses this status if a particular developer has exceeded the daily limit on requests.[14] Sipgate uses this code if an account does not have sufficient funds to start a call.[15] Shopify uses this code when the store has not paid their fees and is temporarily disabled.[16] Stripe uses this code for failed payments where parameters were correct, for example blocked fraudulent payments.[17]
403 Forbidden
The request contained valid data and was understood by the server, but the server is refusing action. This may be due to the user not having the necessary permissions for a resource or needing an account of some sort, or attempting a prohibited action (e.g. creating a duplicate record where only one is allowed). This code is also typically used if the request provided authentication by answering the WWW-Authenticate header field challenge, but the server did not accept that authentication. The request should not be repeated.
404 Not Found
The requested resource could not be found but may be available in the future. Subsequent requests by the client are permissible.
405 Method Not Allowed
A request method is not supported for the requested resource; for example, a GET request on a form that requires data to be presented via POST, or a PUT request on a read-only resource.
406 Not Acceptable
The requested resource is capable of generating only content not acceptable according to the Accept headers sent in the request. See Content negotiation.
407 Proxy Authentication Required
The client must first authenticate itself with the proxy.
408 Request Timeout
The server timed out waiting for the request. According to HTTP specifications: «The client did not produce a request within the time that the server was prepared to wait. The client MAY repeat the request without modifications at any later time.»
409 Conflict
Indicates that the request could not be processed because of conflict in the current state of the resource, such as an edit conflict between multiple simultaneous updates.
410 Gone
Indicates that the resource requested was previously in use but is no longer available and will not be available again. This should be used when a resource has been intentionally removed and the resource should be purged. Upon receiving a 410 status code, the client should not request the resource in the future. Clients such as search engines should remove the resource from their indices. Most use cases do not require clients and search engines to purge the resource, and a «404 Not Found» may be used instead.
411 Length Required
The request did not specify the length of its content, which is required by the requested resource.
412 Precondition Failed
The server does not meet one of the preconditions that the requester put on the request header fields.
413 Payload Too Large
The request is larger than the server is willing or able to process. Previously called «Request Entity Too Large» in RFC 2616.[18]
414 URI Too Long
The URI provided was too long for the server to process. Often the result of too much data being encoded as a query-string of a GET request, in which case it should be converted to a POST request. Called «Request-URI Too Long» previously in RFC 2616.[19]
415 Unsupported Media Type
The request entity has a media type which the server or resource does not support. For example, the client uploads an image as image/svg+xml, but the server requires that images use a different format.
416 Range Not Satisfiable
The client has asked for a portion of the file (byte serving), but the server cannot supply that portion. For example, if the client asked for a part of the file that lies beyond the end of the file. Called «Requested Range Not Satisfiable» previously RFC 2616.[20]
417 Expectation Failed
The server cannot meet the requirements of the Expect request-header field.[21]
418 I’m a teapot (RFC 2324, RFC 7168)
This code was defined in 1998 as one of the traditional IETF April Fools’ jokes, in RFC 2324, Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol, and is not expected to be implemented by actual HTTP servers. The RFC specifies this code should be returned by teapots requested to brew coffee.[22] This HTTP status is used as an Easter egg in some websites, such as Google.com’s «I’m a teapot» easter egg.[23][24][25] Sometimes, this status code is also used as a response to a blocked request, instead of the more appropriate 403 Forbidden.[26][27]
421 Misdirected Request
The request was directed at a server that is not able to produce a response (for example because of connection reuse).
422 Unprocessable Entity
The request was well-formed but was unable to be followed due to semantic errors.[8]
423 Locked (WebDAV; RFC 4918)
The resource that is being accessed is locked.[8]
424 Failed Dependency (WebDAV; RFC 4918)
The request failed because it depended on another request and that request failed (e.g., a PROPPATCH).[8]
425 Too Early (RFC 8470)
Indicates that the server is unwilling to risk processing a request that might be replayed.
426 Upgrade Required
The client should switch to a different protocol such as TLS/1.3, given in the Upgrade header field.
428 Precondition Required (RFC 6585)
The origin server requires the request to be conditional. Intended to prevent the ‘lost update’ problem, where a client GETs a resource’s state, modifies it, and PUTs it back to the server, when meanwhile a third party has modified the state on the server, leading to a conflict.[28]
429 Too Many Requests (RFC 6585)
The user has sent too many requests in a given amount of time. Intended for use with rate-limiting schemes.[28]
431 Request Header Fields Too Large (RFC 6585)
The server is unwilling to process the request because either an individual header field, or all the header fields collectively, are too large.[28]
451 Unavailable For Legal Reasons (RFC 7725)
A server operator has received a legal demand to deny access to a resource or to a set of resources that includes the requested resource.[29] The code 451 was chosen as a reference to the novel Fahrenheit 451 (see the Acknowledgements in the RFC).

5xx server errors

The server failed to fulfil a request.

Response status codes beginning with the digit «5» indicate cases in which the server is aware that it has encountered an error or is otherwise incapable of performing the request. Except when responding to a HEAD request, the server should include an entity containing an explanation of the error situation, and indicate whether it is a temporary or permanent condition. Likewise, user agents should display any included entity to the user. These response codes are applicable to any request method.

500 Internal Server Error
A generic error message, given when an unexpected condition was encountered and no more specific message is suitable.
501 Not Implemented
The server either does not recognize the request method, or it lacks the ability to fulfil the request. Usually this implies future availability (e.g., a new feature of a web-service API).
502 Bad Gateway
The server was acting as a gateway or proxy and received an invalid response from the upstream server.
503 Service Unavailable
The server cannot handle the request (because it is overloaded or down for maintenance). Generally, this is a temporary state.[30]
504 Gateway Timeout
The server was acting as a gateway or proxy and did not receive a timely response from the upstream server.
505 HTTP Version Not Supported
The server does not support the HTTP version used in the request.
506 Variant Also Negotiates (RFC 2295)
Transparent content negotiation for the request results in a circular reference.[31]
507 Insufficient Storage (WebDAV; RFC 4918)
The server is unable to store the representation needed to complete the request.[8]
508 Loop Detected (WebDAV; RFC 5842)
The server detected an infinite loop while processing the request (sent instead of 208 Already Reported).
510 Not Extended (RFC 2774)
Further extensions to the request are required for the server to fulfill it.[32]
511 Network Authentication Required (RFC 6585)
The client needs to authenticate to gain network access. Intended for use by intercepting proxies used to control access to the network (e.g., «captive portals» used to require agreement to Terms of Service before granting full Internet access via a Wi-Fi hotspot).[28]

Unofficial codes

The following codes are not specified by any standard.

419 Page Expired (Laravel Framework)
Used by the Laravel Framework when a CSRF Token is missing or expired.
420 Method Failure (Spring Framework)
A deprecated response used by the Spring Framework when a method has failed.[33]
420 Enhance Your Calm (Twitter)
Returned by version 1 of the Twitter Search and Trends API when the client is being rate limited; versions 1.1 and later use the 429 Too Many Requests response code instead.[34] The phrase «Enhance your calm» comes from the 1993 movie Demolition Man, and its association with this number is likely a reference to cannabis.[citation needed]
430 Request Header Fields Too Large (Shopify)
Used by Shopify, instead of the 429 Too Many Requests response code, when too many URLs are requested within a certain time frame.[35]
450 Blocked by Windows Parental Controls (Microsoft)
The Microsoft extension code indicated when Windows Parental Controls are turned on and are blocking access to the requested webpage.[36]
498 Invalid Token (Esri)
Returned by ArcGIS for Server. Code 498 indicates an expired or otherwise invalid token.[37]
499 Token Required (Esri)
Returned by ArcGIS for Server. Code 499 indicates that a token is required but was not submitted.[37]
509 Bandwidth Limit Exceeded (Apache Web Server/cPanel)
The server has exceeded the bandwidth specified by the server administrator; this is often used by shared hosting providers to limit the bandwidth of customers.[38]
529 Site is overloaded
Used by Qualys in the SSLLabs server testing API to signal that the site can’t process the request.[39]
530 Site is frozen
Used by the Pantheon Systems web platform to indicate a site that has been frozen due to inactivity.[40]
598 (Informal convention) Network read timeout error
Used by some HTTP proxies to signal a network read timeout behind the proxy to a client in front of the proxy.[41]
599 Network Connect Timeout Error
An error used by some HTTP proxies to signal a network connect timeout behind the proxy to a client in front of the proxy.

Internet Information Services

Microsoft’s Internet Information Services (IIS) web server expands the 4xx error space to signal errors with the client’s request.

440 Login Time-out
The client’s session has expired and must log in again.[42]
449 Retry With
The server cannot honour the request because the user has not provided the required information.[43]
451 Redirect
Used in Exchange ActiveSync when either a more efficient server is available or the server cannot access the users’ mailbox.[44] The client is expected to re-run the HTTP AutoDiscover operation to find a more appropriate server.[45]

IIS sometimes uses additional decimal sub-codes for more specific information,[46] however these sub-codes only appear in the response payload and in documentation, not in the place of an actual HTTP status code.

nginx

The nginx web server software expands the 4xx error space to signal issues with the client’s request.[47][48]

444 No Response
Used internally[49] to instruct the server to return no information to the client and close the connection immediately.
494 Request header too large
Client sent too large request or too long header line.
495 SSL Certificate Error
An expansion of the 400 Bad Request response code, used when the client has provided an invalid client certificate.
496 SSL Certificate Required
An expansion of the 400 Bad Request response code, used when a client certificate is required but not provided.
497 HTTP Request Sent to HTTPS Port
An expansion of the 400 Bad Request response code, used when the client has made a HTTP request to a port listening for HTTPS requests.
499 Client Closed Request
Used when the client has closed the request before the server could send a response.

Cloudflare

Cloudflare’s reverse proxy service expands the 5xx series of errors space to signal issues with the origin server.[50]

520 Web Server Returned an Unknown Error
The origin server returned an empty, unknown, or unexpected response to Cloudflare.[51]
521 Web Server Is Down
The origin server refused connections from Cloudflare. Security solutions at the origin may be blocking legitimate connections from certain Cloudflare IP addresses.
522 Connection Timed Out
Cloudflare timed out contacting the origin server.
523 Origin Is Unreachable
Cloudflare could not reach the origin server; for example, if the DNS records for the origin server are incorrect or missing.
524 A Timeout Occurred
Cloudflare was able to complete a TCP connection to the origin server, but did not receive a timely HTTP response.
525 SSL Handshake Failed
Cloudflare could not negotiate a SSL/TLS handshake with the origin server.
526 Invalid SSL Certificate
Cloudflare could not validate the SSL certificate on the origin web server. Also used by Cloud Foundry’s gorouter.
527 Railgun Error
Error 527 indicates an interrupted connection between Cloudflare and the origin server’s Railgun server.[52]
530
Error 530 is returned along with a 1xxx error.[53]

AWS Elastic Load Balancer

Amazon’s Elastic Load Balancing adds a few custom return codes

460
Client closed the connection with the load balancer before the idle timeout period elapsed. Typically when client timeout is sooner than the Elastic Load Balancer’s timeout.[54]
463
The load balancer received an X-Forwarded-For request header with more than 30 IP addresses.[54]
561 Unauthorized
An error around authentication returned by a server registered with a load balancer. You configured a listener rule to authenticate users, but the identity provider (IdP) returned an error code when authenticating the user.[55]

Caching warning codes (obsoleted)

The following caching related warning codes were specified under RFC 7234. Unlike the other status codes above, these were not sent as the response status in the HTTP protocol, but as part of the «Warning» HTTP header.[56][57]

Since this «Warning» header is often neither sent by servers nor acknowledged by clients, this header and its codes were obsoleted by the HTTP Working Group in 2022 with RFC 9111.[58]

110 Response is Stale
The response provided by a cache is stale (the content’s age exceeds a maximum age set by a Cache-Control header or heuristically chosen lifetime).
111 Revalidation Failed
The cache was unable to validate the response, due to an inability to reach the origin server.
112 Disconnected Operation
The cache is intentionally disconnected from the rest of the network.
113 Heuristic Expiration
The cache heuristically chose a freshness lifetime greater than 24 hours and the response’s age is greater than 24 hours.
199 Miscellaneous Warning
Arbitrary, non-specific warning. The warning text may be logged or presented to the user.
214 Transformation Applied
Added by a proxy if it applies any transformation to the representation, such as changing the content encoding, media type or the like.
299 Miscellaneous Persistent Warning
Same as 199, but indicating a persistent warning.

See also

  • Custom error pages
  • List of FTP server return codes
  • List of HTTP header fields
  • List of SMTP server return codes
  • Common Log Format

Explanatory notes

  1. ^ Emphasised words and phrases such as must and should represent interpretation guidelines as given by RFC 2119

References

  1. ^ a b c «Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) Status Code Registry». Iana.org. Archived from the original on December 11, 2011. Retrieved January 8, 2015.
  2. ^ «RFC 9110: HTTP Semantics and Content, Section 10.1.1 «Expect»«.
  3. ^ Goland, Yaronn; Whitehead, Jim; Faizi, Asad; Carter, Steve R.; Jensen, Del (February 1999). HTTP Extensions for Distributed Authoring – WEBDAV. IETF. doi:10.17487/RFC2518. RFC 2518. Retrieved October 24, 2009.
  4. ^ Oku, Kazuho (December 2017). An HTTP Status Code for Indicating Hints. IETF. doi:10.17487/RFC8297. RFC 8297. Retrieved December 20, 2017.
  5. ^ Stewart, Mark; djna. «Create request with POST, which response codes 200 or 201 and content». Stack Overflow. Archived from the original on October 11, 2016. Retrieved October 16, 2015.
  6. ^ «RFC 9110: HTTP Semantics and Content, Section 15.3.4».
  7. ^ «RFC 9110: HTTP Semantics and Content, Section 7.7».
  8. ^ a b c d e Dusseault, Lisa, ed. (June 2007). HTTP Extensions for Web Distributed Authoring and Versioning (WebDAV). IETF. doi:10.17487/RFC4918. RFC 4918. Retrieved October 24, 2009.
  9. ^ Delta encoding in HTTP. IETF. January 2002. doi:10.17487/RFC3229. RFC 3229. Retrieved February 25, 2011.
  10. ^ a b «RFC 9110: HTTP Semantics and Content, Section 15.4 «Redirection 3xx»«.
  11. ^ Berners-Lee, Tim; Fielding, Roy T.; Nielsen, Henrik Frystyk (May 1996). Hypertext Transfer Protocol – HTTP/1.0. IETF. doi:10.17487/RFC1945. RFC 1945. Retrieved October 24, 2009.
  12. ^ «The GNU Taler tutorial for PHP Web shop developers 0.4.0». docs.taler.net. Archived from the original on November 8, 2017. Retrieved October 29, 2017.
  13. ^ «Google API Standard Error Responses». 2016. Archived from the original on May 25, 2017. Retrieved June 21, 2017.
  14. ^ «Sipgate API Documentation». Archived from the original on July 10, 2018. Retrieved July 10, 2018.
  15. ^ «Shopify Documentation». Archived from the original on July 25, 2018. Retrieved July 25, 2018.
  16. ^ «Stripe API Reference – Errors». stripe.com. Retrieved October 28, 2019.
  17. ^ «RFC2616 on status 413». Tools.ietf.org. Archived from the original on March 7, 2011. Retrieved November 11, 2015.
  18. ^ «RFC2616 on status 414». Tools.ietf.org. Archived from the original on March 7, 2011. Retrieved November 11, 2015.
  19. ^ «RFC2616 on status 416». Tools.ietf.org. Archived from the original on March 7, 2011. Retrieved November 11, 2015.
  20. ^ TheDeadLike. «HTTP/1.1 Status Codes 400 and 417, cannot choose which». serverFault. Archived from the original on October 10, 2015. Retrieved October 16, 2015.
  21. ^ Larry Masinter (April 1, 1998). Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol (HTCPCP/1.0). doi:10.17487/RFC2324. RFC 2324. Any attempt to brew coffee with a teapot should result in the error code «418 I’m a teapot». The resulting entity body MAY be short and stout.
  22. ^ I’m a teapot
  23. ^ Barry Schwartz (August 26, 2014). «New Google Easter Egg For SEO Geeks: Server Status 418, I’m A Teapot». Search Engine Land. Archived from the original on November 15, 2015. Retrieved November 4, 2015.
  24. ^ «Google’s Teapot». Retrieved October 23, 2017.[dead link]
  25. ^ «Enable extra web security on a website». DreamHost. Retrieved December 18, 2022.
  26. ^ «I Went to a Russian Website and All I Got Was This Lousy Teapot». PCMag. Retrieved December 18, 2022.
  27. ^ a b c d Nottingham, M.; Fielding, R. (April 2012). «RFC 6585 – Additional HTTP Status Codes». Request for Comments. Internet Engineering Task Force. Archived from the original on May 4, 2012. Retrieved May 1, 2012.
  28. ^ Bray, T. (February 2016). «An HTTP Status Code to Report Legal Obstacles». ietf.org. Archived from the original on March 4, 2016. Retrieved March 7, 2015.
  29. ^ alex. «What is the correct HTTP status code to send when a site is down for maintenance?». Stack Overflow. Archived from the original on October 11, 2016. Retrieved October 16, 2015.
  30. ^ Holtman, Koen; Mutz, Andrew H. (March 1998). Transparent Content Negotiation in HTTP. IETF. doi:10.17487/RFC2295. RFC 2295. Retrieved October 24, 2009.
  31. ^ Nielsen, Henrik Frystyk; Leach, Paul; Lawrence, Scott (February 2000). An HTTP Extension Framework. IETF. doi:10.17487/RFC2774. RFC 2774. Retrieved October 24, 2009.
  32. ^ «Enum HttpStatus». Spring Framework. org.springframework.http. Archived from the original on October 25, 2015. Retrieved October 16, 2015.
  33. ^ «Twitter Error Codes & Responses». Twitter. 2014. Archived from the original on September 27, 2017. Retrieved January 20, 2014.
  34. ^ «HTTP Status Codes and SEO: what you need to know». ContentKing. Retrieved August 9, 2019.
  35. ^ «Screenshot of error page». Archived from the original (bmp) on May 11, 2013. Retrieved October 11, 2009.
  36. ^ a b «Using token-based authentication». ArcGIS Server SOAP SDK. Archived from the original on September 26, 2014. Retrieved September 8, 2014.
  37. ^ «HTTP Error Codes and Quick Fixes». Docs.cpanel.net. Archived from the original on November 23, 2015. Retrieved October 15, 2015.
  38. ^ «SSL Labs API v3 Documentation». github.com.
  39. ^ «Platform Considerations | Pantheon Docs». pantheon.io. Archived from the original on January 6, 2017. Retrieved January 5, 2017.
  40. ^ «HTTP status codes — ascii-code.com». www.ascii-code.com. Archived from the original on January 7, 2017. Retrieved December 23, 2016.
  41. ^
    «Error message when you try to log on to Exchange 2007 by using Outlook Web Access: «440 Login Time-out»«. Microsoft. 2010. Retrieved November 13, 2013.
  42. ^ «2.2.6 449 Retry With Status Code». Microsoft. 2009. Archived from the original on October 5, 2009. Retrieved October 26, 2009.
  43. ^ «MS-ASCMD, Section 3.1.5.2.2». Msdn.microsoft.com. Archived from the original on March 26, 2015. Retrieved January 8, 2015.
  44. ^ «Ms-oxdisco». Msdn.microsoft.com. Archived from the original on July 31, 2014. Retrieved January 8, 2015.
  45. ^ «The HTTP status codes in IIS 7.0». Microsoft. July 14, 2009. Archived from the original on April 9, 2009. Retrieved April 1, 2009.
  46. ^ «ngx_http_request.h». nginx 1.9.5 source code. nginx inc. Archived from the original on September 19, 2017. Retrieved January 9, 2016.
  47. ^ «ngx_http_special_response.c». nginx 1.9.5 source code. nginx inc. Archived from the original on May 8, 2018. Retrieved January 9, 2016.
  48. ^ «return» directive Archived March 1, 2018, at the Wayback Machine (http_rewrite module) documentation.
  49. ^ «Troubleshooting: Error Pages». Cloudflare. Archived from the original on March 4, 2016. Retrieved January 9, 2016.
  50. ^ «Error 520: web server returns an unknown error». Cloudflare. Retrieved November 1, 2019.
  51. ^ «527 Error: Railgun Listener to origin error». Cloudflare. Archived from the original on October 13, 2016. Retrieved October 12, 2016.
  52. ^ «Error 530». Cloudflare. Retrieved November 1, 2019.
  53. ^ a b «Troubleshoot Your Application Load Balancers – Elastic Load Balancing». docs.aws.amazon.com. Retrieved August 27, 2019.
  54. ^ «Troubleshoot your Application Load Balancers — Elastic Load Balancing». docs.aws.amazon.com. Retrieved January 24, 2021.
  55. ^ «Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Caching». datatracker.ietf.org. Retrieved September 25, 2021.
  56. ^ «Warning — HTTP | MDN». developer.mozilla.org. Retrieved August 15, 2021. CC BY-SA icon.svg Some text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 Generic (CC BY-SA 2.5) license.
  57. ^ «RFC 9111: HTTP Caching, Section 5.5 «Warning»«. June 2022.

External links

  • «RFC 9110: HTTP Semantics and Content, Section 15 «Status Codes»«.
  • Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) Status Code Registry

Понравилась статья? Поделить с друзьями:
  • Http error 307
  • Http error 304 not modified
  • Http error 303
  • Http error 301 302
  • Http error 300