Parse error unexpected tick

Help me solve errors in VHDL code

hahaconma

Newbie level 1

i’m a beginer in VHDL, when i wrote this code, it generated some errors, can somebody help me?
ERROR:HDLParsers:164 — «D:/Chinh/FPGA/lab/traffic/STAT_MAC.vhd» Line 40. parse error, unexpected TICK
ERROR:HDLParsers:164 — «D:/Chinh/FPGA/lab/traffic/STAT_MAC.vhd» Line 45. parse error, unexpected TICK
ERROR:HDLParsers:164 — «D:/Chinh/FPGA/lab/traffic/STAT_MAC.vhd» Line 51. parse error, unexpected TICK
ERROR:HDLParsers:164 — «D:/Chinh/FPGA/lab/traffic/STAT_MAC.vhd» Line 55. parse error, unexpected TICK

LIBRARY ieee;
USE ieee.std_logic_1164.all;
use IEEE.STD_LOGIC_ARITH.ALL;
use IEEE.STD_LOGIC_UNSIGNED.ALL;

ENTITY STAT_MAC IS
PORT (CLK,RESET: IN std_logic;
TIMER : in std_logic_vector ( 3 downto 0);
AMB, GRN, RD : out std_logic);

ARCHITECTURE BEHAVIOR OF STAT_MAC IS
— State variables for machine sreg
— SIGNAL AMBER, next_AMBER, GREEN, next_GREEN, RED, next_RED, REDAMB,
— next_REDAMB : std_logic;
SIGNAL next_AMB,next_GRN,next_RD : std_logic;
signal tmr : std_logic_vector (3 downto 0);
BEGIN
p00: PROCESS (CLK,next_AMB,next_GRN, next_RD)
BEGIN
IF CLK=’1′ AND CLK’event THEN
AMB

Marcel Majoor

Full Member level 2

Re: help me VHDL code

Just about the syntax problem:

You use ‘0000’ (with single quotes). This is not correct. This should be double quotes, like «0000».

For a std_logic_vector -> use «» (double quotes)
For a std_logic -> use » (single quotes)

Keep in mind that there is a difference between «0» and ‘0’ -> the first is a std_logic_vector (made of a single bit), and the second a std_logic (also a single bit). Since a std_logic is always a single bit, you will never see more than a single character within single quotes.

Added after 14 minutes:

Just one hint (since you will see that your code will not compile):

TIMER is defined as an input in your entity.
In the second process you want to assign a value to TIMER (based on RESET). This is not possible (TIMER being an input).
If TIMER is a signal, then you could do this, but not when it is an entity input.

This is typically handled like follows:

1. define a signal
signal tm: std_logic_vector(3 downto 0);

2. (outside a process, unless you want a synchronous reset) assign the entity signal to your signal
tmr

Источник

parsing — PHP parse/syntax errors; and how to solve them

Everyone runs into syntax errors. Even experienced programmers make typos. For newcomers, it’s just part of the learning process. However, it’s often easy to interpret error messages such as:

PHP Parse error: syntax error, unexpected ‘<-code-1>‘ in index.php on line 20

The unexpected symbol isn’t always the real culprit. But the line number gives a rough idea of where to start looking.

Always look at the code context. The syntax mistake often hides in the mentioned or in previous code lines. Compare your code against syntax examples from the manual.

While not every case matches the other. Yet there are some general steps to . This references summarized the common pitfalls:

Closely related references:

While Stack Overflow is also welcoming rookie coders, it’s mostly targetted at professional programming questions.

• Answering everyone’s coding mistakes and narrow typos is considered mostly off-topic.
• So please take the time to follow the basic steps, before posting syntax fixing requests.
• If you still have to, please show your own solving initiative, attempted fixes, and your thought process on what looks or might be wrong.

If your browser displays error messages such as «SyntaxError: illegal character», then it’s not actually php-related, but a javascript-syntax error.

Syntax errors raised on vendor code: Finally, consider that if the syntax error was not raised by editing your codebase, but after an external vendor package install or upgrade, it could be due to PHP version incompatibility, so check the vendor’s requirements against your platform setup.

Answer

Solution:

What are the syntax errors?

PHP belongs to the C-style and imperative programming languages. It has rigid grammar rules, which it cannot recover from when encountering misplaced symbols or ident<-code-18>-code-11>iers. It can<-code-18>-code-8>t guess your coding intentions.

Most important tips

There are a few basic precautions you can always take:

Use proper code indentation, or adopt any lofty coding style. Readability prevents irregularities.

Read the language reference and examples in the manual. Twice, to become somewhat proficient.

How to interpret parser errors

A typical syntax error message reads:

Parse error: syntax error, unexpected <-code-18>-code-4<-code-18>-code-5>-code-2<-code-18>-code-5>, expecting <-code-18>-code-8> <-code-18>-code-4<-code-18>-code-5>-code-1<-code-18>-code-5> <-code-18>-code-8> in file.php on line 217

Which lists the possible location of a syntax mistake. See the mentioned file name and line number.

A moniker such as <-code-18>-code-4<-code-18>-code-5>-code-2<-code-18>-code-5> explains which symbol the parser/tokenizer couldn<-code-18>-code-8>t process finally. This isn<-code-18>-code-8>t necessarily the cause of the syntax mistake, however.

It<-code-18>-code-8>s important to look into previous code lines as well. Often syntax errors are just mishaps that happened earlier. The error line number is just where the parser conclusively gave up to process it all.

Solving syntax errors

There are many approaches to narrow down and fix syntax hiccups.

Open the mentioned source file. Look at the mentioned code line.

For runaway strings and misplaced operators, this is usually where you find the culprit.

Read the line left to right and imagine what each symbol does.

More regularly you need to look at preceding lines as well.

In particular, missing <-code-18>-code-4<-code-18>-code-5>-code-1<-code-18>-code-5> semicolons are missing at the previous line ends/statement. (At least from the stylistic viewpoint. )

If <-code-18>-code-4<-code-18>-code-5> code blocks <-code-18>-code-5> are incorrectly closed or nested, you may need to investigate even further up the source code. Use proper code indentation to simpl<-code-18>-code-11>y that.

Look at the syntax colorization!

Strings and variables and constants should all have d<-code-18>-code-11>ferent colors.

Operators <-code-18>-code-6> should be tinted distinct as well. Else they might be in the wrong context.

If you see string colorization extend too far or too short, then you have found an unescaped or missing closing <-code-18>-code-7> or <-code-18>-code-8> string marker.

Having two same-colored punctuation characters next to each other can also mean trouble. Usually, operators are lone <-code-18>-code-11> it<-code-18>-code-8>s not <-code-18>-code-9> , <-code-18>-code-10> , or parentheses following an operator. Two strings/ident<-code-18>-code-11>iers directly following each other are incorrect in most contexts.

Whitespace is your friend. Follow any coding style.

Break up long lines temporarily.

You can freely add newlines between operators or constants and strings. The parser will then concretize the line number for parsing errors. Instead of looking at the very lengthy code, you can isolate the missing or misplaced syntax symbol.

Split up complex <-code-18>-code-11> statements into distinct or nested <-code-18>-code-11> conditions.

Instead of lengthy math formulas or logic chains, use temporary variables to simpl<-code-18>-code-11>y the code. (More readable = fewer errors.)

Add newlines between:

1. The code you can easily ident<-code-18>-code-11>y as correct,
2. The parts you<-code-18>-code-8>re unsure about,
3. And the lines which the parser complains about.

Partitioning up long code blocks really helps to locate the origin of syntax errors.

Comment out offending code.

If you can<-code-18>-code-8>t isolate the problem source, start to comment out (and thus temporarily remove) blocks of code.

As soon as you got rid of the parsing error, you have found the problem source. Look more closely there.

Sometimes you want to temporarily remove complete function/method blocks. (In case of unmatched curly braces and wrongly indented code.)

When you can<-code-18>-code-8>t resolve the syntax issue, try to rewrite the commented out sections from scratch.

As a newcomer, avoid some of the confusing syntax constructs.

The ternary <-code-18>-code-13> condition operator can compact code and is useful indeed. But it doesn<-code-18>-code-8>t aid readability in all cases. Prefer plain <-code-18>-code-11> statements while unversed.

PHP<-code-18>-code-8>s alternative syntax ( <-code-18>-code-11>: / else<-code-18>-code-11>: / end<-code-18>-code-11><-code-18>-code-4<-code-18>-code-5>-code-1<-code-18>-code-5> ) is common for templates, but arguably less easy to follow than normal <-code-18>-code-4<-code-18>-code-5> code <-code-18>-code-5> blocks.

The most prevalent newcomer mistakes are:

Missing semicolons <-code-18>-code-4<-code-18>-code-5>-code-1<-code-18>-code-5> for terminating statements/lines.

Mismatched string quotes for <-code-18>-code-7> or <-code-18>-code-8> and unescaped quotes within.

Forgotten operators, in particular for the string . concatenation.

Unbalanced ( parentheses ) . Count them in the reported line. Are there an equal number of them?

Don<-code-18>-code-8>t forget that solving one syntax problem can uncover the next.

If you make one issue go away, but other crops up in some code below, you<-code-18>-code-8>re mostly on the right path.

If after editing a new syntax error crops up in the same line, then your attempted change was possibly a failure. (Not always though.)

Restore a backup of previously working code, <-code-18>-code-11> you can<-code-18>-code-8>t fix it.

• Adopt a source code versioning system. You can always view a d<-code-18>-code-11>f of the broken and last working version. Which might be enlightening as to what the syntax problem is.

Invisible stray Unicode characters: In some cases, you need to use a hexeditor or d<-code-18>-code-11>ferent editor/viewer on your source. Some problems cannot be found just from looking at your code.

In particular BOMs, zero-width spaces, or non-breaking spaces, and smart quotes regularly can find their way into the source code.

Take care of which type of linebreaks are saved in files.

PHP just honors n newlines, not r carriage returns.

Which is occasionally an issue for MacOS users (even on OS&nbsp<-code-18>-code-4<-code-18>-code-5>-code-1<-code-18>-code-5> X for misconfigured editors).

It often only surfaces as an issue when single-line // or # comments are used. Multiline /*. */ comments do seldom disturb the parser when linebreaks get ignored.

If your syntax error does not transmit over the web: It happens that you have a syntax error on your machine. But posting the very same file online does not exhibit it anymore. Which can only mean one of two things:

You are looking at the wrong file!

Or your code contained invisible stray Unicode (see above). You can easily find out: Just copy your code back from the web form into your text editor.

Check your PHP version. Not all syntax constructs are available on every server.

php -v for the command line interpreter

&lt<-code-18>-code-4<-code-18>-code-5>-code-1<-code-18>-code-5>?php phpinfo()<-code-18>-code-4<-code-18>-code-5>-code-1<-code-18>-code-5> for the one invoked through the webserver.

Those aren<-code-18>-code-8>t necessarily the same. In particular when working with frameworks, you will them to match up.

Don<-code-18>-code-8>t use PHP<-code-18>-code-8>s reserved keywords as ident<-code-18>-code-11>iers for functions/methods, classes or constants.

Trial-and-error is your last resort.

If all else fails, you can always google your error message. Syntax symbols aren<-code-18>-code-8>t as easy to search for (Stack Overflow itself is indexed by SymbolHound though). Therefore it may take looking through a few more pages before you find something relevant.

White screen of death

If your website is just blank, then typically a syntax error is the cause. Enable their display with:

• error_reporting = E_ALL
• display_errors = 1

Enabling it within the broken script is too late because PHP can<-code-18>-code-8>t even interpret/run the first line. A quick workaround is crafting a wrapper script, say test.php :

Then invoke the failing code by accessing this wrapper script.

Answer

Solution:

I think this topic is totally overdiscussed/overcomplicated. Using an IDE is THE way to go to completely avoid any syntax errors. I would even say that working without an IDE is kind of unprofessional. Why? Because modern IDEs check your syntax after every character you type. When you code and your entire line turns red, and a big warning notice shows you the exact type and the exact position of the syntax error, then there’s absolutely no need to search for another solution.

Using a syntax-checking IDE means:

You’ll (effectively) never run into syntax errors again, simply because you see them right as you type. Seriously.

Excellent IDEs with syntax check (all of them are available for Linux, Windows and Mac):

Answer

Solution:

Unexpected <-code-11>-code-1>

These days, the unexpected <-code-11>-code-1> array bracket is commonly seen on outdated PHP versions. The short array syntax is available since PHP >= 5.4. Older installations only support <-code-11>-code-3> .

Array function result dereferencing is likewise not available for older PHP versions:

Though, you’re always better off just upgrading your PHP installation. For shared webhosting plans, first research if e.g. <-code-11>-code-7> can be used to enable a newer runtime.

BTW, there are also preprocessors and PHP 5.4 syntax down-converters if you’re really clingy with older + slower PHP versions.

Other causes for Unexpected <-code-11>-code-1> syntax errors

If it’s not the PHP version mismatch, then it’s oftentimes a plain typo or newcomer syntax mistake:

Confusing <-code-11>-code-1> with opening curly braces <-code-11>or parentheses <-code-12>is a common oversight.

Or trying to dereference <-code-16>ants <-code-12>before PHP 5.6 <-code-23>as arrays:

At least PHP interprets that <-code-16>as a <-code-16>ant name.

If you meant to access an array variable <-code-12>which is the typical cause here<-code-23>, then add the leading <-code-17>sigil — so it becomes a <-code-17>varname .

You are trying to use the <-code-19>keyword on a member of an associative array. This is not valid syntax:

Unexpected <-code-21>closing square bracket

This is somewhat rarer, but there are also syntax accidents with the terminating array <-code-21>bracket.

Again mismatches with <-code-23>parentheses or > curly braces are common:

Or trying to end an array where there isn’t one:

Which often occurs in multi-line and nested array declarations.

If so, use your IDE for bracket matching to find any premature <-code-21>array closure. At the very least use more spacing and newlines to narrow it down.

Answer

Solution:

Unexpected

An &quot<-code-13<-code-16>unexpected <-code-1<-code-16>&quot <-code-13<-code-16>means that there’s a literal <-code-2<-code-16>name <-code-8<-code-16>which doesn’t fit into the current expression/statement structure

Missing semicolon

It most commonly indicates a missing semicolon in the previous line <-code-4<-code-16>Variable assignments following a statement are a good indicator where to look:

String concatenation

Btw <-code-8<-code-16>you should prefer string interpolation <-code-23>basic variables in double quotes) whenever that helps readability <-code-4<-code-16>Which avoids these syntax issues

String interpolation is a scripting language core feature <-code-4<-code-16>No shame in utilizing it <-code-4<-code-16>Ignore any micro-optimization advise about variable <-code-4<-code-16>concatenation being faster <-code-4<-code-16>It’s not

library IEEE;
use IEEE.STD_LOGIC_1164.ALL;
use ieee.std_logic_arith.all;
use ieee.std_logic_unsigned.all;


entity binary_add is
    port( n1 : in std_logic_vector(3 downto 0);
    n2 : in std_logic_vector(3 downto 0);
    segments : out std_logic_vector(7 downto 0);
    bool : out bit;
    o : out std_logic_vector(3 downto 0);
    DNout : out std_logic_vector(3 downto 0));

end binary_add;

architecture Behavioral of binary_add is
begin

process(n1, n2) 
begin

o <= n1 + n2;

if( o = '1010') then 
bool <= '1';
else
bool <= '0';
end if;

end process;

end Behavioral;

ERROR:HDLParsers:## - "C:/Xilinx/12.3/ISE_DS/ISE/.../binary_add.vhd" Line ##. parse error, unexpected TICK

2 ответа

if output = "0101";    -- illegal

some_signal <= output; -- illegal

architecture Behavioral of binary_add is

signal sum : std_logic_vector(3 downto 0);

begin

process(n1, n2, sum) 
begin

sum <= n1 + n2;

if( sum = '1010') then 
bool <= '1';
else
bool <= '0';
end if;

end process;

o <= sum;

end Behavioral;

© copyright 1999-2023
OpenCores.org, equivalent to Oliscience, all rights reserved. OpenCores®, registered trademark.