Sql state 72000 error code 12899

‘ORA-12899 — SQLState: 72000’ Causes Continuous Retrying of Transaction Persistence, Resulting in Loss of the Next Set of Transactions (Doc ID 1519656.1) Last updated on JUNE 07, 2021 Applies to: Symptoms When attempting to insert a record with a longer response than accepted into «TR_LTM_CHK_TND».»ID_AJD_CHK», the following error occurs and the application does not […]

Содержание

  1. ‘ORA-12899 — SQLState: 72000’ Causes Continuous Retrying of Transaction Persistence, Resulting in Loss of the Next Set of Transactions (Doc ID 1519656.1)
  2. Applies to:
  3. Symptoms
  4. Changes
  5. Cause
  6. To view full details, sign in with your My Oracle Support account.
  7. Don’t have a My Oracle Support account? Click to get started!
  8. A «value too large for column» SQL exception occurs for the LSW_USR_GRP_XREF table for IBM Business Process Manager (BPM)
  9. Troubleshooting
  10. Problem
  11. Symptom
  12. Cause
  13. Sql State 72000 Error Code 12899 Ora-12899
  14. ‘ORA-12899 — SQLState: 72000’ Causes Continuous Retrying .
  15. oracle — SQL Error: ORA-12899: value too large for column .
  16. How To Fix Sql State 72000 Error Code 12899 Hibernate (Solved)
  17. Getting error «ORA-12899: value too large for column» in .
  18. How To Resolve the Error «ORA-12899: value too large for .
  19. ORA-12899: Value too Large for Column
  20. ORA-12899: value too large for column length while .
  21. SQL state [72000]; error code [12899]зљ„й”™иЇЇ — д»Јз Ѓе¤©ењ°
  22. Question on ORA-12899: value too large — Ask TOM
  23. Sql State 72000 Error Code 12899 Ora-12899 Fixes & Solutions
  24. Confluence Support
  25. Get started
  26. Knowledge base
  27. Products
  28. Jira Software
  29. Jira Service Management
  30. Jira Work Management
  31. Confluence
  32. Bitbucket
  33. Resources
  34. Documentation
  35. Community
  36. System Status
  37. Suggestions and bugs
  38. Marketplace
  39. Billing and licensing
  40. Viewport
  41. Confluence
  42. Not able to access Confluence page with the error: ‘ORA-12899: value too large for column «CONFDB».»LINKS».»DESTPAGETITLE»‘
  43. Related content
  44. Still need help?
  45. Problem
  46. Diagnosis
  47. Исправление ошибок ЕИС 15.09.2017
  48. Администратор

‘ORA-12899 — SQLState: 72000’ Causes Continuous Retrying of Transaction Persistence, Resulting in Loss of the Next Set of Transactions (Doc ID 1519656.1)

Last updated on JUNE 07, 2021

Applies to:

Symptoms

When attempting to insert a record with a longer response than accepted into «TR_LTM_CHK_TND».»ID_AJD_CHK», the following error occurs and the application does not handle the exception.В This causes loss of transaction data for subsequent transactions.

«ERROR 2012-12-04 19:57:42,093 51418562 (RMI TCP Connection(11460)-10.192.68.1:com.extendyourstore.domain.arts.JdbcSaveTenderLineItems):

[com.extendyourstore.domain.arts.JdbcSaveTenderLineItems.insertCheckTenderLineItem(JdbcSaveTenderLineItems.java:1857)]

Class: com.extendyourstore.foundation.manager.data.DataException(Revision $Revision: /main/10 $) @12460173: SQLState: 72000

Error generated from Oracle: user requested cancel of current operationSource Exception: java.sql.SQLException: ORA-12899: value too large for column «POS_OWNER».»TR_LTM_CHK_TND».»ID_AJD_CHK» (actual: 22, maximum: 20)

Transaction Name:

Error code: [15] [An error occurred while executing the command]

Error code (extended): [12899]

Description: [SQLState: 72000

Error generated from Oracle: user requested cancel of current operationSource Exception: java.sql.SQLException: ORA-12899: value too large for column «POS_OWNER».»TR_LTM_CHK_TND».»ID_AJD_CHK» (actual: 22, maximum: 20)«

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Introduce a transaction with a response for the check approval longer than 20 characters.
2. POS does not move the transaction to the QueueException folder, nor is it retried for persistence.

The transaction is just lost (as well as the subsequent transactions) in the FileQueue.

Changes

Cause

To view full details, sign in with your My Oracle Support account.

Don’t have a My Oracle Support account? Click to get started!

In this Document

My Oracle Support provides customers with access to over a million knowledge articles and a vibrant support community of peers and Oracle experts.

Oracle offers a comprehensive and fully integrated stack of cloud applications and platform services. For more information about Oracle (NYSE:ORCL), visit oracle.com. пїЅ Oracle | Contact and Chat | Support | Communities | Connect with us | | | | Legal Notices | Terms of Use

Источник

A «value too large for column» SQL exception occurs for the LSW_USR_GRP_XREF table for IBM Business Process Manager (BPM)

Troubleshooting

Problem

After upgrading from IBM Business Process Manager V7.5.1 Fix Pack 1 to Fix Paxck 2, you receive an error message. The message indicates that a value for the GROUP_NAME column in the LSW_USR_GRP_XREF table is too large when it tries to create a snapshot for an application.

Symptom

You see an error message that is similar to the following text. The following example is seen with an Oracle database. Error messages for other databases might differ slightly.

[7/122/14 15:14:29:281 CEST] 0000208a wle E Exception while creating the snapshot com.lombardisoftware.client.delegate.
BusinessDelegateException: PreparedStatementCallback; uncategorized SQLException for SQL [insert into LSW_USR_GRP_XREF (GROUP_ID,GROUP_NAME, DISPLAY_NAME,GROUP_TYPE,DESCRIPTION,GROUP_STATE,PARENT_GROUP_ID) values (. )]; SQL state [72000]; error code [12899]; ORA-12899: value too large for column «BPMDB».»LSW_USR_GRP_XREF».»GROUP_NAME» (actual: 102, maximum: 101) ; nested exception is java.sql.SQLException: ORA-12899: value too large for column «BPMDB».»LSW_USR_GRP_XREF».»GROUP_NAME» (actual: 102, maximum: 101)

Cause

This error is seen in version 7.5.1 Fix Pack 1, when the short name of an assigned group exceeds 25 characters.The length of the GROUP_NAME column in the LSW_USR_GRP_XREF table is limited to 101 characters or 404 bytes.

The GROUP_NAMEs are structured as follows:
(Short name of group)_T/S_BPD-ID.Snapshot-ID

The string after the short name of the group consumes 76 characters, which leaves 25 characters for the user to specify for the short name of the group.

In V7.5.1 Fix Pack 2, the length for the GROUP_NAME column is increased to 256 characters, which leaves 180 characters for the user to specify the short name of a group

Источник

Sql State 72000 Error Code 12899 Ora-12899

We have collected for you the most relevant information on Sql State 72000 Error Code 12899 Ora-12899, as well as possible solutions to this problem. Take a look at the links provided and find the solution that works. Other people have encountered Sql State 72000 Error Code 12899 Ora-12899 before you, so use the ready-made solutions.

‘ORA-12899 — SQLState: 72000’ Causes Continuous Retrying .

    https://support.oracle.com/knowledge/More%20Applications%20and%20Technologies/1519656_1.html
    Jul 08, 2020 · ‘ORA-12899 — SQLState: 72000’ Causes Continuous Retrying of Transaction Persistence, Resulting in Loss of the Next Set of Transactions (Doc ID 1519656.1) Last updated on JULY 08, 2020

oracle — SQL Error: ORA-12899: value too large for column .

    https://stackoverflow.com/questions/4347888/sql-error-ora-12899-value-too-large-for-column
    This answer still comes up high in the list for ORA-12899 and lot of non helpful comments above, even if they are old. The most helpful comment was #4 for any professional trying to find out why they are getting this when loading data. Some characters are more than 1 byte in length, especially true on SQL Server.

How To Fix Sql State 72000 Error Code 12899 Hibernate (Solved)

    http://serol.org/sql-state-72000-error-code-12899-hibernate.html
    Sql State 72000 Error Code 12899 Could Not Execute Jdbc Batch Update in the windshield of some piper aircraft for? Atlassian Home Forum Spring Projects Batch Why does Deep Ora 12899 Value Too Large For Column Actual Maximum This forum is now a read-only archive.

Getting error «ORA-12899: value too large for column» in .

    https://support.adeptia.com/hc/en-us/articles/360055102531-Getting-error-ORA-12899-value-too-large-for-column-in-Kernel-log
    2020-10-20 22:53:54 java.sql.SQLException: ORA-12899: value too large for column «LOG_DB».»AU_SPAZIOLOG».»AU_TRANSACTION_PID» (actual: 61, maximum: 30) When a SPAZIO activity is executed, Adeptia saves its generated log details in the AU_SPAZIOLOG table along with its Transaction_PID.

How To Resolve the Error «ORA-12899: value too large for .

    https://support.oracle.com/knowledge/PeopleSoft%20Enterprise/1965631_1.html
    My Oracle Support provides customers with access to over a million knowledge articles and a vibrant support community of peers and Oracle experts.

ORA-12899: Value too Large for Column

    http://www.dba-oracle.com/t_ora_12899_value_too_large_for_column.htm
    Answer: To diagnose any error, you start by using the oerr utility to display the ORA-12899 error: ORA-12899: value too large for column string (actual: string, maximum: string) Cause: An attempt was made to insert or update a column with a value which is too wide for the width of the destination column.

ORA-12899: value too large for column length while .

    https://collaborate.pega.com/discussion/ora-12899-value-too-large-column-length-while-performing-rules-upgrade-step-after-rules
    Skip to main content Pega-wide Utility. Pega.com; Academy; Pega Community; More. PegaWorld; Pega Blog; Product Design

SQL state [72000]; error code [12899]зљ„й”™иЇЇ — д»Јз Ѓе¤©ењ°

    https://www.codetd.com/article/1184289
    и°ѓз”Ёзі»з»џпјљ org.springframework.orm.hibernate3.HibernateJdbcException: JDBC exception on Hibernate data access: SQLException for SQL [update MEMBER_ACCOUNT set VERSION=?,

Question on ORA-12899: value too large — Ask TOM

    https://asktom.oracle.com/pls/apex/f?p=100:11:0. P11_QUESTION_ID:9533233800346995570
    Question on ORA-12899: value too large Hi Tom,We have a migration project which from Sybase SQL Anywhere to Oracle. And there is an issue we still have no perfect solution. In Sybase, When insert/update to a target column, the source string will be auto truncate if the length more than the target column definition. For example. whe

Sql State 72000 Error Code 12899 Ora-12899 Fixes & Solutions

We are confident that the above descriptions of Sql State 72000 Error Code 12899 Ora-12899 and how to fix it will be useful to you. If you have another solution to Sql State 72000 Error Code 12899 Ora-12899 or some notes on the existing ways to solve it, then please drop us an email.

Источник

Confluence Support

Get started

Knowledge base

Products

Jira Software

Project and issue tracking

Jira Service Management

Service management and customer support

Jira Work Management

Manage any business project

Confluence

Bitbucket

Git code management

Resources

Documentation

Usage and admin help

Answers, support, and inspiration

System Status

Cloud services health

Suggestions and bugs

Feature suggestions and bug reports

Marketplace

Billing and licensing

Frequently asked questions

Viewport

Confluence

Not able to access Confluence page with the error: ‘ORA-12899: value too large for column «CONFDB».»LINKS».»DESTPAGETITLE»‘

Related content

Still need help?

The Atlassian Community is here for you.

Platform notice: Server and Data Center only. This article only applies to Atlassian products on the server and data center platforms .

Problem

Users are not able to access a Confluence page with the error: value too large for column «CONFLUENCE».»LINKS».»DESTPAGETITLE»

The following appears in the atlassian-confluence .log

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Steps

  • There are Linking Plugin by ServiceRocket plugin links inside the page

Источник

Исправление ошибок ЕИС 15.09.2017

Администратор

Исправлена ошибка «JDBC exeption on Hibernate data access: SQLExeption for SQL [insert into CRYPTO_SIGN (ATTACHMENT_ID _и другие поля_) values (?, ?, ? . ) ]; SQL state [72000]; error code [12899]; Could not execute JDBC batch update . JDBC exeption on Hibernate data access: SQLExeption for SQL [insert into CRYPTO_SIGN (ATTACHMENT_ID _и другие поля_) values (?, ?, ? . ) ]; SQL state [72000]; error code [12899]; Could not execute JDBC batch update . » возникающая у некоторых пользователей при попытке подписания изменений перечня организаций по которым проводится оценка соответствия.

Исправлена ошибка, в результате которой у некоторых пользователей положительный результат контроля по ч.5. Ст. 99 44-ФЗ мог не дойти до реестра контрактов и остаться в статусе «На контроле».

Исправлена ошибка, в результате которой суммы в полях «Фактически оплачено» и «Фактически оплачено заказчиком (в российских рублях)» на вкладке «Информация об исполнении (расторжении) контракта» могли отличаться.

Исправлена ошибка, в результате которой у некоторых пользователей при формировании исполнения контракта при типе документа «Платежный документа» мог некорректно сработать контроль на обязательность прикрепления документа.

Исправлена ошибка, в результате которой у пользователя после передачи полномочий и изменении привязки к органу контроля, при направлении плана закупок на проверку в орган контроля, документы могли поступать на проверку в личный кабинет старого органа контроля, у которого в перечне субъектов контроля организация-Заказчик не отображается.

Исправлена ошибка, в результате которой у некоторых реестровых записей планов- графиков, прошедших контроль в соответствии с ч. 5 ст. 99, могла не отображаться пиктограмма об успешном прохождении контроля.

Исправлена ошибка, в результате которой в карточке плана-графика на вкладке «Особые закупки» некоторые ИКЗ особых закупок могли не соответствовать ИКЗ в ЛК Заказчика.

Исправлена ошибка, в результате которой в карточке плана-графика на вкладке «Описание объекта закупки» в таблице с ТРУ «Описание объекта закупки» количества ТРУ могли отображаться для другого года планирования, отличного от года, установленного в ЛК Заказчика.

Исправлена ошибка, в результате которой в результатах расширенного поиска, при поиске по параметру «Заказчик», могли отображаться не все отчеты, соответствующие установленным параметрам поиска.

Источник

Источник

Troubleshooting

Problem

After upgrading from IBM Business Process Manager V7.5.1 Fix Pack 1 to Fix Paxck 2, you receive an error message. The message indicates that a value for the GROUP_NAME column in the LSW_USR_GRP_XREF table is too large when it tries to create a snapshot for an application.

Symptom

You see an error message that is similar to the following text. The following example is seen with an Oracle database. Error messages for other databases might differ slightly.

[7/122/14 15:14:29:281 CEST] 0000208a wle           E   Exception while creating the snapshot   com.lombardisoftware.client.delegate.  
BusinessDelegateException: PreparedStatementCallback; uncategorized SQLException for SQL [insert into LSW_USR_GRP_XREF (GROUP_ID,GROUP_NAME, DISPLAY_NAME,GROUP_TYPE,DESCRIPTION,GROUP_STATE,PARENT_GROUP_ID) values (?,?,?,?,?,?,?)]; SQL state [72000]; error code [12899]; ORA-12899: value too large for column «BPMDB».»LSW_USR_GRP_XREF».»GROUP_NAME» (actual: 102, maximum: 101) ; nested exception is java.sql.SQLException: ORA-12899: value too large for column «BPMDB».»LSW_USR_GRP_XREF».»GROUP_NAME» (actual: 102, maximum: 101)

Cause

This error is seen in version 7.5.1 Fix Pack 1, when the short name of an assigned group exceeds 25 characters.The length of the GROUP_NAME column in the LSW_USR_GRP_XREF table is limited to 101 characters or 404 bytes.

The GROUP_NAMEs are structured as follows:

(Short name of group)_T/S_BPD-ID.Snapshot-ID

The string after the short name of the group consumes 76 characters, which leaves 25 characters for the user to specify for the short name of the group.

In V7.5.1 Fix Pack 2, the length for the GROUP_NAME column is increased to 256 characters, which leaves 180 characters for the user to specify the short name of a group

If you see that the previously mentioned error occurs after migrating to V7.5.1 Fix Pack 2, the post installation database migration script, which is

wle_upgradeSchema_ProcessServer.sql

, was not run successfully. This script contains a table alteration for the LSW_USR_GRP_XREF.GROUP_NAME. See the following code:

BEGIN
DECLARE
v_isNullable CHAR(1);
 BEGIN
   select nullable into v_isNullable from all_tab_columns where UPPER(owner)=UPPER(‘perfdbuser’) AND UPPER(table_name) = UPPER(‘LSW_USR_GRP_XREF’) AND UPPER(column_name)= UPPER(‘GROUP_NAME’);    
   IF (v_isNullable = ‘Y’) THEN
     EXECUTE IMMEDIATE  ‘ALTER TABLE LSW_USR_GRP_XREF MODIFY «GROUP_NAME» NVARCHAR2(256) NOT NULL ENABLE’;
   ELSE
  EXECUTE IMMEDIATE  ‘ALTER TABLE LSW_USR_GRP_XREF MODIFY «GROUP_NAME» NVARCHAR2(256)’;
END IF ;
 END ;
END ;

In IBM Business Process Manager V7.5.1 Fix Pack 1, the createTable_ProcessServer.sql statements create a column width of 101 characters for the GROUP_NAME of the LSW_USR_GRP_XREF table.

Resolving The Problem

To resolve the problem, ensure that you run the wle_upgradeSchema_ProcessServer.sql script as described in the Readme.txt file that is supplied with V7.5.1 Fix Pack 2. Alternatively, follow the instructions that are provided in the Profile upgrade instructions for IBM Business Process Manager (BPM) V7.5.1 Fix Pack 2 (V7.5.1.2) product installations with existing profiles document.

[{«Product»:{«code»:»SSFTDH»,»label»:»IBM Business Process Manager Standard»},»Business Unit»:{«code»:»BU053″,»label»:»Cloud & Data Platform»},»Component»:»Upgrade»,»Platform»:[{«code»:»PF002″,»label»:»AIX»},{«code»:»PF016″,»label»:»Linux»},{«code»:»PF027″,»label»:»Solaris»},{«code»:»PF033″,»label»:»Windows»}],»Version»:»7.5.1.1;7.5.1.2″,»Edition»:»»,»Line of Business»:{«code»:»LOB45″,»label»:»Automation»}},{«Product»:{«code»:»SSFTBX»,»label»:»IBM Business Process Manager Express»},»Business Unit»:{«code»:»BU053″,»label»:»Cloud & Data Platform»},»Component»:»Upgrade»,»Platform»:[{«code»:»PF016″,»label»:»Linux»},{«code»:»PF033″,»label»:»Windows»}],»Version»:»7.5.1.2;7.5.1.1″,»Edition»:»»,»Line of Business»:{«code»:»LOB45″,»label»:»Automation»}},{«Product»:{«code»:»SSFTN5″,»label»:»IBM Business Process Manager Advanced»},»Business Unit»:{«code»:»BU053″,»label»:»Cloud & Data Platform»},»Component»:»Upgrade»,»Platform»:[{«code»:»PF002″,»label»:»AIX»},{«code»:»PF016″,»label»:»Linux»},{«code»:»PF027″,»label»:»Solaris»},{«code»:»PF033″,»label»:»Windows»}],»Version»:»7.5.1.2;7.5.1.1″,»Edition»:»»,»Line of Business»:{«code»:»LOB45″,»label»:»Automation»}}]

Источник

Problem

Users are not able to access a Confluence page with the error:  value too large for column «CONFLUENCE».»LINKS».»DESTPAGETITLE»

The following appears in the atlassian-confluence.log

org.springframework.jdbc.UncategorizedSQLException: Hibernate operation: could not insert: com.atlassian.confluence.links.OutgoingLink#82706958; uncategorized SQLException for SQL []; SQL state [72000]; error code [12899]; ORA-12899: value too large for column "CONFLUENCE"."LINKS"."DESTPAGETITLE" (actual: 348, maximum: 255) ; nested exception is java.sql.SQLException: ORA-12899: value too large for column "CONFLUENCE"."LINKS"."DESTPAGETITLE" (actual: 348, maximum: 255) 
at org.springframework.jdbc.support.AbstractFallbackSQLExceptionTranslator.translate(AbstractFallbackSQLExceptionTranslator.java:83)
caused by: java.sql.SQLException: ORA-12899: value too large for column "CONFLUENCE"."LINKS"."DESTPAGETITLE" (actual: 348, maximum: 255) 
at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4CTTIoer.processError(T4CTTIoer.java:440)

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Steps

  • There are Linking Plugin by ServiceRocket plugin links inside the page

Cause

  • One of the links (from the Linking Plugin) in the page contained more than 255 characters
  • It is a known bug/limitation from the plugin itself. See: System error with URLs longer than 255 signs and the specific usage of link-window macro  

Workaround

  1. Edit the page using the following documentation as a guide (Editing or Deleting a Page That Won’t Render)
    • Enter the following URL: <baseurl>/pages/editpage.action?spaceKey=<spaceKey>&title=pageName (replacing spacekey and pagename with the space key and the page title of the problematic page) to access the edit page
  2. Check on the all ServiceRocket linking macro inside a page for links that has character more than 255
  3. Save the page

Last modified on Nov 2, 2018

Related content

  • No related content found
Источник

Support Article

SA-22207

Summary

Text with smart quotes copied into a text property that is 64 characters long, does not fit into a database column that has a length of 64.

Error Messages

2016-04-07 09:41:55,418 [your_IP-1024-exec-19] [TABTHREAD1] [ ] [ your_ruleset:01.01.01] ( internal.access.DatabaseImpl) ERROR your_server|127.0.0.1 your_operator — Encountered problem when performing a Commit
com.pega.pegarules.pub.database.DatabaseException: Database-General Problem writing an instance to the database 12899 72000 ORA-12899: value too large for column «YOUR_SCHEMA».»YOUR_TABLE».»YOUR_COLUMN» (actual: 66, maximum: 64)

Caused by SQL Problems.
Problem #1, SQLState 72000, Error code 12899: java.sql.SQLException: ORA-12899: value too large for column «YOUR_SCHEMA».»YOUR_TABLE».»YOUR_COLUMN»  (actual: 66, maximum: 64)

at com.pega.pegarules.data.internal.access.ExceptionInformation.createExceptionDueToDBFailure(ExceptionInformation.java:262)
at com.pega.pegarules.data.internal.access.Saver.insertInstance(Saver.java:1101)
at com.pega.pegarules.data.internal.access.Saver.saveInstance(Saver.java:880)
at com.pega.pegarules.data.internal.access.Saver.saveInstance(Saver.java:777)
at com.pega.pegarules.data.internal.access.Committer.performOps(Committer.java:237)
at com.pega.pegarules.data.internal.access.DatabaseImpl.attemptToProcessUpdates(DatabaseImpl.java:2653)
at com.pega.pegarules.data.internal.access.DatabaseImpl.processUpdates(DatabaseImpl.java:2308)

Caused by: java.sql.SQLException: ORA-12899: value too large for column «YOUR_SCHEMA».»YOUR_TABLE».»YOUR_COLUMN»  (actual: 66, maximum: 64)

at oracle.jdbc.driver.SQLStateMapping.newSQLException(SQLStateMapping.java:70)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.DatabaseError.newSQLException(DatabaseError.java:110)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.DatabaseError.throwSqlException(DatabaseError.java:171)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4CTTIoer.processError(T4CTTIoer.java:455)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4CTTIoer.processError(T4CTTIoer.java:413)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4C8Oall.receive(T4C8Oall.java:1030)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4CPreparedStatement.doOall8(T4CPreparedStatement.java:194)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4CPreparedStatement.executeForRows(T4CPreparedStatement.java:947)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleStatement.doExecuteWithTimeout(OracleStatement.java:1222)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.OraclePreparedStatement.executeInternal(OraclePreparedStatement.java:3381)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.OraclePreparedStatement.executeUpdate(OraclePreparedStatement.java:3462)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.OraclePreparedStatementWrapper.executeUpdate(OraclePreparedStatementWrapper.java:1061)
at org.apache.tomcat.dbcp.dbcp.DelegatingPreparedStatement.executeUpdate(DelegatingPreparedStatement.java:105)
at org.apache.tomcat.dbcp.dbcp.DelegatingPreparedStatement.executeUpdate(DelegatingPreparedStatement.java:105)
at com.pega.pegarules.data.internal.access.DatabasePreparedStatementImpl.executeUpdate(DatabasePreparedStatementImpl.java:476)
at com.pega.pegarules.data.internal.access.Saver.executeUpdate(Saver.java:1617)
at com.pega.pegarules.data.internal.access.Saver.insertInstance(Saver.java:1072)
… 77 more

Steps to Reproduce

  1. Copy a text beyond 64 characters from Microsoft Lync and paste it onto a text area property.
  2. Save the field to a database column with length of 64 [through Obj-Save method].

Root Cause

A third-party product issue.
The problem is that there is a difference between character count and character length. This is due to the character encoding.
The character string in the text field begins with a smart quote. The smart quote takes more than one byte to encode.
The character string length in this case is still 64, but the byte encoded length is 66.

Resolution

Perform the following local-change:
Increase the column width to accommodate the fact that some unicode characters may be present in the string.

Published April 21, 2016 — Updated October 8, 2020

Источник
Skip to content



Open


Issue created Aug 19, 2021 by Joe Wass@afandianOwner2 of 17 checklist items completed2/17 checklist items

Multibyte characters in journal issue causes values too large for SQL column

The journal issue is constrained to 32 characters in the schema but the SQL database (Oracle in production) uses a maximum length 32 bytes, not 32 characters.

Simplest thing will be adding a check in Deposit code for 32 bytes and failing deposit. Alternatively we may be able to expand the column size in the database but we prefer not to as it’s a very large table.

submission: 1505849291; DOI: 10.52065/2520-6877-2021-244-1-5-12, org.springframework.jdbc.UncategorizedSQLException: PreparedStatementCallback; uncategorized SQLException for SQL [INSERT INTO atypon.citation_info (CITATIONID, JOURNALCITEID, BOOKCITEID, SERIESTITLEID, MISSPELLINGID, SUBMISSIONID, VERSION, YEAR, VOLUME, ISSUE, SUPPLEMENT, PAGE, AUTHOR, COMPONENTNUMBER, EDITIONNUMBER, OWNERPREFIX, ARTICLETITLE, SEQUENCENUMBER, TYPE, DOI, MDCONFLICTID, PAGEMOD, SRCTYPE, ORIGPAGE, LASTPAGE, PUBMONTH, PUBDAY, CONFNAMEID, INSTCITEID, FORCEDALIASID, ALIASID, SRCSUBTYPE, LASTUPDATE, REFSUBMISSIONID, MASK) VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?)]; SQL state [72000]; error code [12899]; ORA-12899: value too large for column "ATYPON"."CITATION_INFO"."ISSUE" (actual: 43, maximum: 32)n; nested exception is java.sql.SQLException: ORA-12899: value too large for column "ATYPON"."CITATION_INFO"."ISSUE" (actual: 43, maximum: 32)n

Submission id 1505849291:

<issue>Труды БГТУ Серия 5 №1 (244)</issue>

Happened 76 times in the past hour but otherwise low volume.

https://sentry.io/organizations/crossref/issues/1329561117/?project=1769602&query=is%3Aunresolved&sort=priority&statsPeriod=14d

Expected behavior

How urgent

Definition of ready

  • Product owner: @SaraBowman
  • Tech lead:
  • Service:: or C:: label applied
  • Definition of done updated
  • Acceptance testing plan:
  • Weight applied

Definition of done

  • Unit tests identified, implemented, and passing
  • Code reviewed
  • Available for acceptance testing via a staging URL, or otherwise
  • Consider any impacts to current or future architecture/infrastructure, and update specifications and documentation as needed
  • Knowledge base reviewed and updated
  • Public documentation reviewed and updated
  • Acceptance criteria met

    • AC 1
    • AC 2
  • Acceptance testing passed
  • Deployed to production

Notes

Edited Aug 30, 2021 by Patrick Polischuk

Источник

Понравилась статья? Поделить с друзьями:

Читайте также:

  • Sql state 08001 sql error code 53
  • Sql standard database services unknown msi error code 43 wincc
  • Sql socket write error
  • Sql server разрешены удаленные соединения provider sql network interfaces error 26
  • Sql server ошибка 3624

    • 0 0 голоса
    Рейтинг статьи
    Подписаться
    Уведомить о
    guest

    0 комментариев
    Старые
    Новые Популярные
    Межтекстовые Отзывы
    Посмотреть все комментарии