From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Threat and error management model
In aviation safety, threat and error management (TEM) is an overarching safety management approach that assumes that pilots will naturally make mistakes and encounter risky situations during flight operations. Rather than try to avoid these threats and errors, its primary focus is on teaching pilots to manage these issues so they do not impair safety. Its goal is to maintain safety margins by training pilots and flight crews to detect and respond to events that are likely to cause damage (threats) as well as mistakes that are most likely to be made (errors) during flight operations.[1]
TEM allows crews to measure the complexities of a specific organization’s context — meaning that the threats and errors encountered by pilots will vary depending upon the type of flight operation — and record human performance in that context.[2] TEM also considers technical (e.g. mechanical) and environmental issues, and incorporates strategies from Crew Resource Management to teach pilots to manage threats and errors.
The TEM framework was developed in 1994 by psychologists at University of Texas based on the investigation of accidents of high capacity Regular Public Transport (RPT) airlines.[3] However, an evaluation method was needed to identify threats and errors during flight operations and to add information to existing TEM data.[4][5] A Line Operations Safety Audit (LOSA) serves this purpose and involves the identification and collection of safety-related information — on crew performance, environmental conditions, and operational complexity — by a highly trained observer.[5][6] LOSA data is used to assess the effectiveness of an organization’s training program and to find out how trained procedures are being implemented in day-to-day flights.
Importance of TEM[edit]
Threat and error management is an important element in the training of competent pilots that can effectively manage in-flight challenges.[1][7] Many strategies have been developed (e.g. training, teamwork, reallocating workload) that were focused on improving on stress, fatigue, and error. Flight crew training stressed the importance of operational procedures and technical knowledge, with less emphasis placed on nontechnical skills, which became isolated from the real-world operational contexts.[4] Safety training, including TEM, is important because a crew’s nontechnical (safety) knowledge helps more in managing errors effectively than crews’ familiarization with operations through experience.[8] Candidates who are shortlisted during selection and training processes must demonstrate analytical and coordination capabilities.[9] Possessing these nontechnical skills allows pilots and crew members to carry out their duties efficiently and effectively.
Components of TEM[edit]
The following components are methods that help provide data for the TEM.
LOSA observation training[edit]
Training for LOSA experts includes two sessions: education in procedural protocols, and TEM concepts and classifications.[10] A LOSA trainee is taught to find data first and then code them later for both sessions, during which a crew member must exhibit «LOSA Etiquette» — ability to notify the pilot as to why he or she was not able to detect an error or threat after a flight. The pilot’s responsibilities include his or her opinions on what safety issues could have had an adverse impact on their operations. A LOSA trainee must then record the specific responses of the pilot and thereafter code performance using behavioral markers. The order of the recording is as follows: a) record visible threats; b) identify error types, crew’s responses, and specific outcomes; and c) use CRM behavioral markers to rate crew.[11]
Observers will finally record a pilot’s overall response on a 4-point Likert scale: 1) poor, 2) marginal, 3) good, and 4) outstanding. The data are then quantified and tabulated as exemplified by the following format:[10]
Planning and execution of performance
Task | Task Description | Comments | Rating |
---|---|---|---|
Monitor cross-check | Active monitoring of crews | Situational awareness maintained | Outstanding |
SOP briefing | Carried out necessary briefings | Thorough understanding of procedures | |
Contingency Management | Communicate strategies | Good management of threats and errors. |
Identified Threats | Managed | Mismanaged | *Frequency (N) |
---|---|---|---|
Air Traffic Control | 17 | 2 | 19 |
Airline Operational Pressure | 9 | 0 | 9 |
Weather | 6 | 6 | 12 |
Frequency is the total number of threats that occurred and is denoted by N.
Categories of the LOSA[edit]
LOSA identifies three main categories that must be recorded:
- Errors include procedural errors (mistakes or inadequacy of attention towards a task at hand), and violation of SOP (intentional or unintentional). Although crew members are encouraged not to be afraid of admitting their mistakes, they must be able to criticize themselves since the learning process helps them understand the potential danger presented other crew members.[1]
- Undesired Aircraft States are aircraft configurations or circumstances that are caused either by human error or by external factors.[10] The management of unintended states is vital since they can result in serious aircraft accidents. For example, navigation problems on the cockpit display may lead a pilot to make an incorrect decisions, potentially causing injuries or fatality to passengers and crew members alike.
Safety change process[edit]
Safety change process (SCP), which is part of LOSA, is a formal mechanism that airlines can use to identify active and latent threats to flight operations.[12] It is a guideline that communicates in detail what is an imminent threat to current operations or who is causing the threat. In the past, SCP data were based on investigation of accidents or incidents, experiences, and intuitions but nowadays SCP focuses more on the precursors to accidents.[12] There are several steps involved in conducting SCP:[12]
Safety Change Process (SCP) model | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
An unnamed airline conducted base-line observations from 1996 to 1998 using the defined SCP and LOSA data to improve its organization’s safety culture and the results were positive. The crew error-trapping rate was significantly increased to 55%, meaning that crews were able to detect about 55% of the errors they caused.[12] A 40% reduction in errors related to checklist performance and a 62% reduction in unstabilized approaches (tailstrikes, controlled flight into terrain, runway excursions, etc.) were observed.[12] A proper review and management of SCP and LOSA data can prevent further disasters in flight operations.
See also[edit]
- Accident Classification
- Aviation safety
- Crew Resource Management
- Pilot Error
- Error Management
- The curse of expertise
References[edit]
- ^ a b c Dekker, Sidney; Lundström, Johan (May 2007). «From Threat and Error Management (TEM) to Resilience». Journal of Human Factors and Aerospace Safety: 1. Retrieved 6 October 2015.
- ^ Maurino, Dan (18 April 2005). «Threat and Error Management (TEM)» (PDF). Coordinator, Flight Safety and Human Factors Programme — ICAO. Canadian Aviation Safety Seminar (CASS): 1. Retrieved 6 October 2015.
- ^ Banks, Ian. «Threat & Error Management (TEM) SafeSkies Presentation» (PDF). Retrieved 19 October 2015.
- ^ a b Thomas, Matthew (2004). «Predictors of Threat and Error Management: Identification of Core Nontechnical Skills and Implications for Training Systems Design». The International Journal of Aviation Psychology. 14 (2): 207–231. doi:10.1207/s15327108ijap1402_6. S2CID 15271960. Retrieved 24 October 2015.
- ^ a b Earl, Laurie; Murray, Patrick; Bates, Paul (2011). «Line Operations Safety Audit (LOSA) for the management of safety in single pilot operations (LOSA:SP) in Australia and New Zealand». Aeronautica (Griffith University Aerospace Strategic Study Centre) (1): 2.
- ^ Thomas, Matthew (2003). «Operational Fidelity in Simulation-Based Training: The Use of Data from Threat and Error Management Analysis in Instructional Systems Design» (PDF). Proceedings of SimTecT2003: Simulation Conference: 2. Retrieved 19 October 2015.
- ^ Martin, Wayne L. (2019). «Crew Resource Management and Individual Resilience». Crew Resource Management. Elsevier. pp. 207–226. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-812995-1.00007-5.
- ^ Thomas, Matthew; Petrilli, Renee (Jan 2006). «Crew Familiarity: Operational Experience, NonTechnical Performance, and Error Management» (PDF). Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine. 77 (1). Retrieved 25 October 2015.
- ^ Sexton, J. Bryan; Thomas, Eric; Helmreich, Robert (March 2000). «Error, Stress, and Teamwork in Medicine and Aviation: Cross Sectional Surveys». British Medical Journal. 320 (7273): 745–749. doi:10.1136/bmj.320.7237.745. PMC 27316. PMID 10720356.
- ^ a b c Earl, Laurie; Bates, Paul; Murray, Patrick; Glendon, Ian; Creed, Peter (2012). «Developing a Single-Pilot Line Operations Safety Audit: An Aviation Pilot Study». Aviation Psychology and Applied Human Factors. 2: 49–61. doi:10.1027/2192-0923/a000027. hdl:10072/49214. Retrieved 24 October 2015.
- ^ Leva, M.C.; et al. (August 2008). «The advancement of a new human factors report – ‘The Unique Report’ – facilitating flight crew auditing of performance/operations as part of an airline’s safety management system». Ergonomics. 53 (2): 164–183. doi:10.1080/00140130903437131. PMID 20099172. S2CID 32462406.
- ^ a b c d e «Line Operations Safety Audit (LOSA)» (PDF). ICAO Journal (First Edition): 25–29. 2002. Retrieved 18 November 2015.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Threat and error management model
In aviation safety, threat and error management (TEM) is an overarching safety management approach that assumes that pilots will naturally make mistakes and encounter risky situations during flight operations. Rather than try to avoid these threats and errors, its primary focus is on teaching pilots to manage these issues so they do not impair safety. Its goal is to maintain safety margins by training pilots and flight crews to detect and respond to events that are likely to cause damage (threats) as well as mistakes that are most likely to be made (errors) during flight operations.[1]
TEM allows crews to measure the complexities of a specific organization’s context — meaning that the threats and errors encountered by pilots will vary depending upon the type of flight operation — and record human performance in that context.[2] TEM also considers technical (e.g. mechanical) and environmental issues, and incorporates strategies from Crew Resource Management to teach pilots to manage threats and errors.
The TEM framework was developed in 1994 by psychologists at University of Texas based on the investigation of accidents of high capacity Regular Public Transport (RPT) airlines.[3] However, an evaluation method was needed to identify threats and errors during flight operations and to add information to existing TEM data.[4][5] A Line Operations Safety Audit (LOSA) serves this purpose and involves the identification and collection of safety-related information — on crew performance, environmental conditions, and operational complexity — by a highly trained observer.[5][6] LOSA data is used to assess the effectiveness of an organization’s training program and to find out how trained procedures are being implemented in day-to-day flights.
Importance of TEM[edit]
Threat and error management is an important element in the training of competent pilots that can effectively manage in-flight challenges.[1][7] Many strategies have been developed (e.g. training, teamwork, reallocating workload) that were focused on improving on stress, fatigue, and error. Flight crew training stressed the importance of operational procedures and technical knowledge, with less emphasis placed on nontechnical skills, which became isolated from the real-world operational contexts.[4] Safety training, including TEM, is important because a crew’s nontechnical (safety) knowledge helps more in managing errors effectively than crews’ familiarization with operations through experience.[8] Candidates who are shortlisted during selection and training processes must demonstrate analytical and coordination capabilities.[9] Possessing these nontechnical skills allows pilots and crew members to carry out their duties efficiently and effectively.
Components of TEM[edit]
The following components are methods that help provide data for the TEM.
LOSA observation training[edit]
Training for LOSA experts includes two sessions: education in procedural protocols, and TEM concepts and classifications.[10] A LOSA trainee is taught to find data first and then code them later for both sessions, during which a crew member must exhibit «LOSA Etiquette» — ability to notify the pilot as to why he or she was not able to detect an error or threat after a flight. The pilot’s responsibilities include his or her opinions on what safety issues could have had an adverse impact on their operations. A LOSA trainee must then record the specific responses of the pilot and thereafter code performance using behavioral markers. The order of the recording is as follows: a) record visible threats; b) identify error types, crew’s responses, and specific outcomes; and c) use CRM behavioral markers to rate crew.[11]
Observers will finally record a pilot’s overall response on a 4-point Likert scale: 1) poor, 2) marginal, 3) good, and 4) outstanding. The data are then quantified and tabulated as exemplified by the following format:[10]
Planning and execution of performance
Task | Task Description | Comments | Rating |
---|---|---|---|
Monitor cross-check | Active monitoring of crews | Situational awareness maintained | Outstanding |
SOP briefing | Carried out necessary briefings | Thorough understanding of procedures | |
Contingency Management | Communicate strategies | Good management of threats and errors. |
Identified Threats | Managed | Mismanaged | *Frequency (N) |
---|---|---|---|
Air Traffic Control | 17 | 2 | 19 |
Airline Operational Pressure | 9 | 0 | 9 |
Weather | 6 | 6 | 12 |
Frequency is the total number of threats that occurred and is denoted by N.
Categories of the LOSA[edit]
LOSA identifies three main categories that must be recorded:
- Errors include procedural errors (mistakes or inadequacy of attention towards a task at hand), and violation of SOP (intentional or unintentional). Although crew members are encouraged not to be afraid of admitting their mistakes, they must be able to criticize themselves since the learning process helps them understand the potential danger presented other crew members.[1]
- Undesired Aircraft States are aircraft configurations or circumstances that are caused either by human error or by external factors.[10] The management of unintended states is vital since they can result in serious aircraft accidents. For example, navigation problems on the cockpit display may lead a pilot to make an incorrect decisions, potentially causing injuries or fatality to passengers and crew members alike.
Safety change process[edit]
Safety change process (SCP), which is part of LOSA, is a formal mechanism that airlines can use to identify active and latent threats to flight operations.[12] It is a guideline that communicates in detail what is an imminent threat to current operations or who is causing the threat. In the past, SCP data were based on investigation of accidents or incidents, experiences, and intuitions but nowadays SCP focuses more on the precursors to accidents.[12] There are several steps involved in conducting SCP:[12]
Safety Change Process (SCP) model | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
An unnamed airline conducted base-line observations from 1996 to 1998 using the defined SCP and LOSA data to improve its organization’s safety culture and the results were positive. The crew error-trapping rate was significantly increased to 55%, meaning that crews were able to detect about 55% of the errors they caused.[12] A 40% reduction in errors related to checklist performance and a 62% reduction in unstabilized approaches (tailstrikes, controlled flight into terrain, runway excursions, etc.) were observed.[12] A proper review and management of SCP and LOSA data can prevent further disasters in flight operations.
See also[edit]
- Accident Classification
- Aviation safety
- Crew Resource Management
- Pilot Error
- Error Management
- The curse of expertise
References[edit]
- ^ a b c Dekker, Sidney; Lundström, Johan (May 2007). «From Threat and Error Management (TEM) to Resilience». Journal of Human Factors and Aerospace Safety: 1. Retrieved 6 October 2015.
- ^ Maurino, Dan (18 April 2005). «Threat and Error Management (TEM)» (PDF). Coordinator, Flight Safety and Human Factors Programme — ICAO. Canadian Aviation Safety Seminar (CASS): 1. Retrieved 6 October 2015.
- ^ Banks, Ian. «Threat & Error Management (TEM) SafeSkies Presentation» (PDF). Retrieved 19 October 2015.
- ^ a b Thomas, Matthew (2004). «Predictors of Threat and Error Management: Identification of Core Nontechnical Skills and Implications for Training Systems Design». The International Journal of Aviation Psychology. 14 (2): 207–231. doi:10.1207/s15327108ijap1402_6. S2CID 15271960. Retrieved 24 October 2015.
- ^ a b Earl, Laurie; Murray, Patrick; Bates, Paul (2011). «Line Operations Safety Audit (LOSA) for the management of safety in single pilot operations (LOSA:SP) in Australia and New Zealand». Aeronautica (Griffith University Aerospace Strategic Study Centre) (1): 2.
- ^ Thomas, Matthew (2003). «Operational Fidelity in Simulation-Based Training: The Use of Data from Threat and Error Management Analysis in Instructional Systems Design» (PDF). Proceedings of SimTecT2003: Simulation Conference: 2. Retrieved 19 October 2015.
- ^ Martin, Wayne L. (2019). «Crew Resource Management and Individual Resilience». Crew Resource Management. Elsevier. pp. 207–226. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-812995-1.00007-5.
- ^ Thomas, Matthew; Petrilli, Renee (Jan 2006). «Crew Familiarity: Operational Experience, NonTechnical Performance, and Error Management» (PDF). Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine. 77 (1). Retrieved 25 October 2015.
- ^ Sexton, J. Bryan; Thomas, Eric; Helmreich, Robert (March 2000). «Error, Stress, and Teamwork in Medicine and Aviation: Cross Sectional Surveys». British Medical Journal. 320 (7273): 745–749. doi:10.1136/bmj.320.7237.745. PMC 27316. PMID 10720356.
- ^ a b c Earl, Laurie; Bates, Paul; Murray, Patrick; Glendon, Ian; Creed, Peter (2012). «Developing a Single-Pilot Line Operations Safety Audit: An Aviation Pilot Study». Aviation Psychology and Applied Human Factors. 2: 49–61. doi:10.1027/2192-0923/a000027. hdl:10072/49214. Retrieved 24 October 2015.
- ^ Leva, M.C.; et al. (August 2008). «The advancement of a new human factors report – ‘The Unique Report’ – facilitating flight crew auditing of performance/operations as part of an airline’s safety management system». Ergonomics. 53 (2): 164–183. doi:10.1080/00140130903437131. PMID 20099172. S2CID 32462406.
- ^ a b c d e «Line Operations Safety Audit (LOSA)» (PDF). ICAO Journal (First Edition): 25–29. 2002. Retrieved 18 November 2015.
На основании Вашего запроса эти примеры могут содержать грубую лексику.
На основании Вашего запроса эти примеры могут содержать разговорную лексику.
Другие результаты
Threat&error management (управление ошибками в экипаже).
TEM (Threat and Error Management).
Threat&error management (управление ошибками в экипаже).
Swiss Alpha Management были назначены финансовым консультантом проекта.
Swiss Alpha Management were appointed as the financial advisor and lead funding group for the project.
На Западе существуют четыре понятия, характеризующие подходы к управлению недвижимостью: Facility Management, Property Management, Building Management и Asset Management.
In the West, there are four concepts that characterize the approach to property management: Facility Management, Property Management, Building Management and Asset Management.
Администрирование происходит через оснастку Microsoft Management Console.
Instead, all the administrative tasks are performed through the Microsoft Management Console.
Long-Term Capital Management угодило в российский финансовый кризис.
Long-Term Capital Management ran into, among other things, the Russian financial crisis.
Pure Star Management — не исключение.
And «Pure Star Management» is not an exception.
Дополнительная область знания — Управление заинтересованными лицами (разделили область знаний Communication Management на две: Communication Management и Stakeholders Management).
A further area of knowledge is stakeholder management (divided the Communication Management knowledge domain into two: Communication Management and Stakeholders Management).
Microsoft Dynamics Management Reporter — приложение для финансовой отчётности и анализа.
Management Reporter for Microsoft Dynamics ERP is a financial reporting and analysis solution.
Исследование будет опубликовано в одном из следующих выпусков Management Science.
The study will be published in a forthcoming issue of Management Science.
Подобный слой можно реализовать путем применения API Management.
This task can also be performed using the Management API.
Object Management Group — это интернациональный, открытый, некоммерческий консорциум стандартов компьютерной индустрии.
Object Management Group (OMG) is an international, open membership, not-for-profit computer industry standards consortium.
Научное мышление и физические законы MANAGEMENT повлияли на окружающую среду, человек начинает манипулировать природу.
THE SCIENTIFIC THOUGHT AND MANAGEMENT OF PHYSICAL LAWS has impacted on the environment, man begins to manipulate nature.
Кроме того, мы внимательно следим за новейшими европейскими тенденциями в области facility management.
In addition, we are closely following the latest European trends in the field of facility management.
Wealth Management является ведущей деятельностью в финансовой индустрии в Швейцарии и в мире.
Wealth Management is a leading activity in the financial industry in Switzerland and in the world.
Как известно, Total Quality Management имеет восемь основных принципов.
As it is known, Total Quality Management has eight basic principles.
Мы только начали развивать Lean Management в AsstrA.
We have just started to develop Lean Management at AsstrA.
Cloud Management постарался порадовать конечного пользователя.
Cloud Management has tried to please the end user.
Поэтому переговоры с Wellington Management Company были не слишком сложными.
Therefore, the negotiations with Wellington Management Company were not very difficult.
Подготовьтесь к уникальному опыту в Alfred Ford School Of Management.
Prepare for a unique experience at the Alfred Ford School of Management.
Результатов: 10621. Точных совпадений: 0. Затраченное время: 416 мс
Documents
Корпоративные решения
Спряжение
Синонимы
Корректор
Справка и о нас
Индекс слова: 1-300, 301-600, 601-900
Индекс выражения: 1-400, 401-800, 801-1200
Индекс фразы: 1-400, 401-800, 801-1200
threat [θret] n
threats n
threat [θret] v
threat [θret] adj.
threat [θret] abbr.
threat [θret] n
threats SWOT n
THREAT [θret] abbr.
system of axes
3-component LDV system
3-D LDV system
4-D system
4-D flight-management system
4-D guidance system
AC electrical system
actuation system
aerial delivery system
aerostat system
AEW system
afterburning control system
AI-based expert system
aileron-to-rudder system
air bleed offtake system
air cushion system
air cycle system
air data system
air defence system
air induction system
air refueling system
air traffic control system
air-combat advisory system
air-conditioning system
air-path axis system
air-turbine starting system
airborne early warning system
aircooling system
aircraft reference axis system
aircraft weight-and-balance measuring system
aircraft-autopilot system
aircraft-based system
aircraft-bifilar-pendulum system
aircraft-carried earth axis system
aircraft-carried normal earth axis system
aircrew escape system
airfield lighting control system
airframe/rotor system
airspeed system
alcohol-wash system
alignment control system
all-electronic system
all-weather mission system
altitude loss warning system
angle-of-attack command system
anti-collision system
anti-g system
antitorque system
anti-icing system
antiskid system
area-navigation system
ARI system
artificial feel system
artificial intelligence-based expert system
artificially augmented flight control system
ATC system
attitude and heading reference system
audio system
audiovisual system
auto-diagnosis system
auto-hover system
autolanding system
automatic cambering system
automatic trim system
autostabilization system
autotrim system
axis system
B system
balance-fixed coordinate system
base-excited system
basic axis system
beam-foundation system
bifilar pendulum suspension system
bladder system
blowing system
blowing boundary layer control system
blown flap system
body axis system
body axis coordinate system
body-fitted coordinate system
body-fixed reference system
boom system
boosted flight control system
braking system
breathing system
buddy-buddy refuelling system
cabin pressurization system
cable-mount system
CAD system
canopy’s jettison system
cardiovascular system
cargo loading system
cargo-handling system
carrier catapult system
cartesian axis system
Cat III system
central nervous system
CGI system
circulating oil system
closed cooling system
closed-loop system
cockpit system
cockpit management system
collision avoidance system
combined cooling system
command-by-voice system
command/vehicle system
commercial air transportation system
compensatory system
computer-aided design system
computer-assisted system
computer-generated image system
computer-generated visual system
concentrated-mass system
conflict-alert system
conservative system
constant bandwidth system
constant gain system
consultative expert system
control system
control augmented system
control loader system
cooling system
coordinate system
counterstealth system
coupled system
coupled fire and flight-control system
covert mission system
crew systems
cueing system
curvilinear coordinate system
damped system
data system
data acquisition system
data handling system
data transfer system
data-gathering system
DC electrical system
decision support system
defensive avionics system
deicing system
demisting system
departure prevention system
deterministic system
dual-dual redundant system
4-D navigation system
6-DOF motion system
diagnosable system
dial-a-flap system
direct impingement starting system
displacement control system
display system
display-augmented system
divergent system
DLC system
dogfight system
door-to-door system
Doppler ground velocity system
double-balance system
drive system
drive train/rotor system
dry air refueling system
dual-field-of-view system
dual-wing system
dynamic system
early-warning system
Earth-centered coordinate system
earth-fixed axis system
earth/sky/horizon projector system
ejection system
ejection display system
ejection seat escape system
ejection sequence system
ejector exhaust system
ejector lift system
election safety system
electric starting system
electro-expulsive deicing system
electro-impulse deicing system
electro-vibratory deicing system
electronic flight instrumentation system
Elint system
emergency power system
emitter locator system
EMP-protected system
engine monitoring system
engine-propeller system
engine-related system
enhanced lift system
envelope-limiting system
environmental control system
escape system
excessive pitch attitude warning system
exhaust system
FADEC system
fault-tolerant system
FBW system
feathering system
feedback system
feel system
fin axis system
fire detection system
fire suppression system
fire-extinguishing system
fire-protection system
five-point restraint system
fixed-structure control system
flap system
flap/slat system
flash-protection system
flexible manufacturing system
flight control system
flight control actuation system
flight director system
flight inspection system
flight management system
flight path system
flight path axis system
flight test system
flight-test instrumentation system
flotation system
fluid anti-icing system
flutter control system
flutter margin augmentation system
flutter suppression system
fluttering system
fly-by-light system
fly-by-light control system
fly-by-wire system
fly-by-wire/power-by-wire control system
foolproof system
force-excited system
force-feel system
forward vision augmentation system
fuel conservative guidance system
fuel management system
fuel transfer system
full-vectoring system
full-authority digital engine control system
full-motion system
full-state system
full-time system
fully articulated rotor system
fuselage axis system
g-command system
g-cueing system
g-limiting system
gas generator control system
gas turbine starting system
global positioning system
governing system
ground collision avoidance system
ground proximity warning system
ground-axes system
ground-fixed coordinate system
ground-referenced navigation system
gust alleviation system
gust control system
gyroscopic system
gyroscopically coupled system
halon fire-extinguishing system
halon gas fire-fighting system
hands-off system
head-aimed system
headup guidance system
helmet pointing system
helmet-mounted visual system
hierarchical system
high-damping system
high-authority system
high-lift system
high-order system
high-pay-off system
high-resolution system
higher harmonic control system
hose-reel system
hot-gas anti-icing system
hub plane axis system
hub plane reference axis system
hub-fixed coordinate system
hydraulic system
hydraulic starting system
hydropneumatic system
hydrostatic motion system
hysteretic system
ice-protection system
icing cloud spray system
icing-protection system
identification friend or foe system
image generator system
in-flight entertainment system
incidence limiting system
inert gas generating system
inertial coordinate system
inertial navigation system
inertial reference system
infinite-dimensional system
information management system
inlet boundary layer control system
inlet control system
input system
instruction system
instrument landing system
instrumentation system
intelligence system
intelligent system
interconnection system
intermediate axis system
intrusion alarm system
intrusion detection system
inverted fuel system
landing guidance system
large-travel motion system
laser-based visual system
lateral attitude control system
lateral control system
lateral feel system
lateral seat restraint system
lateral-directional stability and command augmentation system
lead compensated system
left-handed coordinate system
leg restraint system
life support system
liferaft deployment system
lift-distribution control system
lighter-than-air system
lightly damped system
lightning protection system
lightning sensor system
lightning warning system
limited-envelope flight control system
linear vibrating system
liquid oxygen system
load control system
load indication system
local-horizon system
loom system
low-damping system
low-order system
LQG controlled system
lubrication system
lumped parameter system
Mach number system
main transmission system
maintenance diagnostic system
maintenance record system
man-in-the-loop system
man-machine system
maneuver demand system
maneuvering attack system
mass-spring-dashpot system
mass-spring-damper system
mast-mounted sight system
mechanical-hydraulic flight control system
microwave landing system
MIMO system
mine-sweeping system
missile system
missile-fixed system
mission-planning system
mobile aircraft arresting system
modal cancellation system
modal suppression system
mode-decoupling system
model reference system
model-based visual system
model-following system
modelboard system
molecular sieve oxygen generation system
monopulse system
motion system
motion generation system
multi-input single-output system
multi-input, multi-output system
multimode system
multibody system
multidegree-of-freedom system
multiloop system
multiple-input single output system
multiple-input, multiple-output system
multiple-loop system
multiple-redundant system
multiply supported system
multishock system
multivariable system
navigation management system
navigation/attack system
navigation/bomb system
NDT system
neuromuscular system
night/dusk visual system
portable aircraft arresting system
nitrogen inerting system
no-tail-rotor system
nonminimum phase system
nonoscillatory system
nonconservative system
normal earth-fixed axis system
Notar system
nozzle control system
nuclear-hardened system
observer-based system
obstacle warning system
oil system
on-board inert gas generation system
on-board maintenance system
on-board oxygen generating system
on-off system
one degree of freedom system
one-shot lubrication system
open cooling system
open seat escape system
open-loop system
operability system
optic-based control system
optimally controlled system
orthogonal axis system
oxygen generation system
parachute system
partial vectoring system
partial vibrating system
performance-seeking system
perturbed system
pilot reveille system
pilot vision system
pilot-aircraft system
pilot-aircraft-task system
pilot-in-the-loop system
pilot-manipulator system
pilot-plus-airplane system
pilot-vehicle-task system
pilot-warning system
pilot/vehicle system
pitch change system
pitch compensation system
pitch stability and command augmentation system
pitch rate system
pitch rate command system
pitch rate flight control system
pneumatic deicing system
pneumatic ice-protection system
pneumodynamic system
position hold system
power system
power-assisted system
power-boosted system
powered high-lift system
powered-lift system
precognitive system
pressurization system
preview system
probabilistically diagnosable system
probe refuelling system
pronated escape system
propeller-fixed coordinate system
propulsive lift system
proximity warning system
pursuit system
push-rod control system
quantized system
random system
rating system
reconfigurable system
rectangular coordinate system
reduced-gain system
reference axis system
refuelling system
remote augmentor lift system
remote combustion system
response-feedback system
restart system
restraint system
restructurable control system
retraction system
ride-control system
ride-quality system
ride-quality augmentation system
ride-smoothing system
right-handed axis system
right-handed coordinate system
rigid body system
robotic refueling system
rod-mass system
roll augmentation system
roll rate command system
rotating system
rotor system
rotor isolation system
rotor-body system
rotor-wing lift system
route planner system
rudder trim system
rudder-augmentation system
sampled-data system
scheduling system
schlieren system
sea-based system
seat restraint system
seatback video system
self-adjoint system
self-contained starting system
self-diagnosable system
self-excited system
self-repairing system
self-sealing fuel system
self-tuning system
shadow-mask system
shadowgraph system
ship-fixed coordinate system
shock system
short-closed oil system
sighting system
simulation system
simulator-based learning system
single degree of freedom system
single-input multiple-output system
singularly perturbed system
situational awareness system
six-axis motion system
six-degree-of-freedom motion system
six-puck brake system
ski-and-wheel system
skid-to-turn system
snapping system
soft mounting system
soft ride system
sound system
speed-stability system
spherical coordinate system
spin recovery system
spin-prevention system
spring-mass-dashpot system
stability and control augmentation system
stability augmentation system
stability axis coordinate system
stability enhancement system
stall detection system
stall inhibitor system
stall protection system
stall warning system
starting system
stealth system
stochastic system
storage and retrieval system
store alignment system
stores management system
strap-down inertial system
structural system
structural-mode compensation system
structural-mode control system
structural-mode suppression system
STT system
suppression system
suspension system
tactile sensory system
tail clearance control system
tail warning system
task-tailored system
terrain-aided navigation system
terrain-referencing system
test system
thermal control system
thermal protection system
threat-warning system
three-axis augmentation system
three-body tethered system
three-control system
three-gyro system
through-the-canopy escape system
thrust modulation system
thrust-vectoring system
tilt-fold-rotor system
time-invariant system
time-varying system
tip-path-plane coordinate system
torque command/limiting system
tractor rocket system
trailing cone static pressure system
training system
trajectory guidance system
translation rate command system
translational acceleration control system
trim system
trim tank system
triple-load-path system
tutoring system
twin-dome system
two degree of freedom system
two-body system
two-input system
two-input two-output system
two-pod system
two-shock system
two-step shock absorber system
unpowered flap system
unpowered high-lift system
utility services management system
vapor cycle cooling system
variable feel system
variable stability system
variable structure system
vestibular sensory system
vibrating system
vibration isolation system
vibration-control system
vibration-damping system
video-disc-based visual system
visor projection system
visual system
visual display system
visual flying rules system
visual sensory system
visual simulation system
visually coupled system
voice-activated system
vortex system
vortex attenuating system
VTOL control system
wake-imaging system
warning system
water injection cooling system
water-mist system
water-mist spray system
weather system
wheel steering system
wide angle visual system
wind coordinate system
wind shear system
wind-axes system
wind-axes coordinate system
wind-fixed coordinate system
wing axis system
wing flap system
wing sweep system
wing-load-alleviation system
wing-mounted system
wing/propulsion system
wiring system
yaw vane system
Note: This article is based on the preliminary edition of Threat and Error Management (TEM) in Air Traffic Control (ICAO).
Introduction to TEM
Threat and Error Management (TEM) is an overarching safety concept regarding aviation operations and human performance. TEM is not a revolutionary concept, but one that has evolved gradually, as a consequence of the constant drive to improve the margins of safety in aviation operations through the practical integration of Human Factors knowledge.
TEM was developed as a product of collective aviation industry experience. Such experience fostered the recognition that past studies and, most importantly, operational consideration of human performance in aviation had largely overlooked the most important factor influencing human performance in dynamic work environments: the interaction between people and the operational context (i.e., organisational, regulatory and environmental factors) within which people discharged their operational duties.
TEM Background
The origin of TEM can be traced to the Line Operations Safety Audit (LOSA) concept. A partnership between the University of Texas Human Factors Research Project (UT) and Delta Airlines in 1994 developed a line audit methodology utilising jump-seat observations on scheduled flights. Both parties agreed that in order for the audit to be productive and show realistic and un-obscured results, confidentiality of the findings with no regulatory or organisational jeopardy to the flight crews should be guaranteed.
The initial observation forms of the audit were designed by the University of Texas researchers to evaluate Crew Resource Management (CRM) behaviour on the flight deck. The process was then extended to include error and its management as well as the type of error observed. This enabled trained observers to categorise the origin of, detection of and response to (if any) and outcome of each recorded error.
The first full scale TEM-based LOSA was conducted at Continental Airlines in 1996. Together with the original CRM indicators (leadership, communication, and monitoring/cross-checking) the extended concept of TEM was used to identify most frequent threats. This method provided a picture of the most common errors and threats, both those that were well managed and the more problematic and mismanaged.
The recognition of the influence of the operational context in human performance led to the conclusion that the study and consideration of human performance in aviation operations should not be an end in itself. TEM as developed therefore aims to enable broad examination of the dynamic and challenging complexities of the operational context in human performance.
TEM Framework
The TEM framework is a conceptual model that assists in understanding, from an operational perspective, the inter-relationship between safety and human performance in dynamic and challenging operational contexts.
The TEM framework focuses simultaneously on the operational context and the people discharging operational duties in such a context. The framework is descriptive and diagnostic of both human and system performance. It is descriptive because it captures human and system performance in the normal operational context, resulting in realistic descriptions. It is diagnostic because it allows quantifying the complexities of the operational context in relation to the description of human performance in that context, and vice-versa.
The TEM framework can be used in several ways. As a safety analysis tool, the framework can focus on a single event, as is the case with accident/incident analysis; or it can be used to understand systemic patterns within a large set of events, as is the case with operational audits. The TEM framework can be used to inform about licensing requirements, helping clarify human performance needs, strengths and vulnerabilities, thus allowing the definition of competencies from a broader safety management perspective. Subsequently the TEM framework can be a useful tool in On the-Job Training (OJT). The TEM framework can be used as guidance to inform about training requirements, helping an organisation improve the effectiveness of its training interventions, and consequently of its organisational safeguards. The TEM framework can be used to provide training to quality assurance specialists who are responsible for evaluating facility operations as part of certification.
Originally developed for flight deck operations, the TEM framework can nonetheless be used at different levels and sectors within an organisation, and across different organisations within the aviation industry. It is therefore important, when applying TEM, to keep the user’s perspective in the forefront. Depending on «who» is using TEM (i.e. front-line personnel, middle management, senior management, flight operations, maintenance, air traffic control), slight adjustments to related definitions may be required.
The Components of the TEM Framework
There are three basic components in the TEM framework. From the perspective of their users, they have slightly different definitions: threats, errors and undesired (aircraft) states. The framework proposes that threats and errors are part of everyday aviation operations that must be managed by the aviation professionals, since both threats and errors carry the potential to generate undesired states. The undesired states carry the potential for unsafe outcomes thus undesired state management is an essential component of the TEM framework, as important as threat and error management. Undesired state management largely represents the last opportunity to avoid an unsafe outcome and thus maintain safety margins in aviation operations.
- Threats — generally defined as events or errors that occur beyond the influence of the line personnel, increase operational complexity, and which must be managed to maintain the margins of safety.
- Errors — generally defined as actions or inactions by the line personnel that lead to deviations from organisational or operational intentions or expectations. Unmanaged and/or mis-managed errors frequently lead to undesired states. Errors in the operational context thus tend to reduce the margins of safety and increase the probability of an undesirable event.
- Undesired states — generally defined as operational conditions where an unintended situation results in a reduction in margins of safety. Undesired states that result from ineffective threat and/or error management may lead to compromised situations and reduce margins of safety aviation operations. Often considered the last stage before an incident or accident.
Note: “Line personnel” in the context above means air traffic controllers or flight crew.
Related Articles
- For more details about specific TEM characteristics see TEM in ATC and Threat and Error Management (TEM) in Flight Operations.
Further Reading
ICAO
- Threat and Error Management (TEM) in Air Traffic Control, Preliminary Edition 2005;
- Threat and Error Management (TEM), Captain Dan Maurino, Coordinator, Flight safety and Human Factors Programme — ICAO, Canadian Aviation Safety Seminar (CASS), Vancouver, Canada, 18-20 April 2005;
Others
- Defensive Flying for Pilots: An Introduction to Threat and Error Management, Ashleigh Merritt, Ph.D. & James Klinect, Ph.D., The University of Texas Human Factors Research Project, The LOSA Collaborative December 12, 2006.